Jump to content
Washington Football Team Logo
Extremeskins

Moose & Squirrel v Boris & Natasha: what's the deal with the rooskies and trumpland?


Jumbo

Recommended Posts

Even Forbes eyes the Manafort sentence poorly.

 

https://www.forbes.com/sites/charlestiefer/2019/03/07/the-judge-who-let-manafort-off-easy-with-47-months-is-an-arch-conservative/#18b050a15256

 

The Judge Who Let Manafort Off Easy With 47 Months Is An Arch-Conservative

 

Instead, this weak sentence sends these kind of messages of a conservative judge: it is not so bad to use Republican connections to cash in with Putin’s allies; Trump’s campaign manager is worthy of much, much more respect than in the Sentencing Guidelines; Mueller’s quest for the Russia connection deserves little help, and some messages.

 

(snip)

 

Take a comparison of the Manafort case with another prosecution of a political figure, a black Democratic Congressman from a black district in Louisiana named William J. Jefferson. 

Jefferson’s case was basically bribery. It was nationally famous because agents raiding his house found cash in the freezer.

 

Manafort may have gotten off easy with four years, but Ellis threw the book at Jefferson.  In 2009 Ellis sentenced Jefferson to 13 years, the longest sentence of any Congressman to that date. (After further twists and turns Ellis let off Jefferson in December 2017 for five years time served.) It seems that while Judge Ellis can sympathize with Manafort, the Republican presidential campaign manager, he did not sympathize with  Jefferson.

 

Pretty pathetic. One more reason why the GOP has been so hellbent on stacking the courts has been revealed. It's not about abortion or gun rights. It's about Get Out of Jail Free

(or mostly free) cards.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mr. Sinister said:

Yes... perhaps America is done.

 

Its doing what it is supposed to do: making sure wealthy white men don’t face justice for their many crimes.

 

The sick thing about the Ellis decision is that it falls in line with white collar crime convictions. Some how making your money through defrauding and international crime doesn’t mean as much as a black or brown person walking around with an ounce of weed. This country is at its core sick and always has been. 

 

And McConnell has been stacking the court with more and more judges like this.

  • Like 5
  • Sad 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, BenningRoadSkin said:

 

Its doing what it is supposed to do: making sure wealthy white men don’t face justice for their many crimes.

 

The sick thing about the Ellis decision is that it falls in line with white collar crime convictions. Some how making your money through defrauding and international crime doesn’t mean as much as a black or brown person walking around with an ounce of weed. This country is at its core sick and always has been. 

 

And McConnell has been stacking the court with more and more judges like this.

 

It’s a really pathetic indictment of our democracy as well. The voting population is so poorly informed and disconnected from reality, that this kind of nonsense isn’t political suicide. 

 

The GOP can simultaneously run on anti-elite platforms while using all the power at their disposal to stack every branch of government in service of the elites. It would be so laughably dumb if it wasn’t a sign of a failing system of governance.

  • Like 2
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, TheGreatBuzz said:

Is prosecution able to appeal sentence?

 

This is a good question and one I had as well. From what I can find the answer is yes, they absolutely can as long as there are legit concerns about the sentence that was handed down. In this case I'd be very surprised if Mueller's team doesn't appeal, as the sentence is so grossly out of line with the DoJ's sentencing guidelines, and because the judge seemed to go out of his way to side with Manafort (an otherwise blameless life? are you ****ING KIDDING ME?).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Worse, according to NPR this morning, it’s unclear whether the next case will result in consecutive or concurrent sentencing. 

 

I didn’t realize “minimum sentencing guidelines” and “mandatory minimum” were different things. I didn’t know a judge could undercut minimum sentencing guidelines by so much

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Bang said:

With Liberty and Justice for all.

 


**** your ****ing pledge.  Another lie.

 

~Bang

 

Or in the words of The Almighty Steve Vai...

"WHICH  liberty and justice for all?" ~Passion and Warfare 

 

 

Edited by skinsmarydu
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...