Jump to content
Washington Football Team Logo
Extremeskins

Moose & Squirrel v Boris & Natasha: what's the deal with the rooskies and trumpland?


Jumbo

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, CousinsCowgirl84 said:

Trump is nice to all of our enemies, not just Putin. 

 

That's factually not right. He's actually started a trade war with China.

 

Having said that, looking into ties with Saudi Arabia as it relates to Kushner is important too. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even if hes not aware of the collusion, which is a stretch by any means really, he is definitely involved in the cover up. The thing with Junior where he lied and said the meeting was about adoption, clear as day cover up. And there are emails, and witnesses to prove it. They have already admitted to it. 

 

That right there, knowing that Russia hacked out election at the time is a problem with or without knowledge that there was actually any help. You cannot absolve him of that no matter how you try. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Hersh said:

 

That's factually not right. He's actually started a trade war with China.

 

Having said that, looking into ties with Saudi Arabia as it relates to Kushner is important too. 

 

 

China is not actually our enemy, they are an important trade partner.. starting a trade war with them, not smart.

 

NK and Russia actively work against the interested of the US.

Edited by CousinsCowgirl84
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, CousinsCowgirl84 said:

 

(From the other thread) Trumps campaign definitely colluded, I’m not blind. Did trump himself do something illegal, mueller will tell us.

 

"Well, yeah, it's a fact that every one of his hand-picked subordinates participated in anti-American conspiracy, but it's possible that the person who hand picked them (and who, BTW, makes a point about emphasizing what a hands-on meddler he is, in everything he does) was completely unaware, and didn't hand pick them specifically for this purpose. "

 

"No doubt some local fisherman, out for a pleasure cruise, at night, in eel-infested waters."  

 

 

 

Edited by Larry
  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, CousinsCowgirl84 said:

 

 

China is not actually our enemy, they are an important trade partner.. starting a trade war with them, not smart.

 

NK and Russia actively work against the interested of the US.

 

Are you suggesting China doesn't actively work against the interests of the US? You gotta do some research on that.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

47 minutes ago, Hersh said:

 

Are you suggesting China doesn't actively work against the interests of the US? You gotta do some research on that.

 

 

No, you are right, I had forgotten about the cyber warfare stuff 

16 minutes ago, TheGreatBuzz said:

 

Would you say it is better or worse than getting head from an intern and lying about it?

 

probably better... it’s close though, in Clinton’s case he was in a position of authority over the intern.

 

 

The logic that “Republicans did something foolish so now democrats have every right to act foolish” is foolish. I can only guess that is your point... the republicans did it so why can’t the democrats? Right?

Edited by CousinsCowgirl84
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CousinsCowgirl84 said:

 

 

I don’t think paying an adult entertainer to keep her mouth shut is a high crime... 

 

 

Honestly, I never cared much about that either. Consensual stuff. Should not matter in the big picture. As an admitted hater, I'd love to see him go down for anything- even this, because of campaign finance illegality but I don't care who he bumps uglies with and don't really hold the "act" against him.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Chachie said:

 

 

Honestly, I never cared much about that either. Consensual stuff. Should not matter in the big picture. As an admitted hater, I'd love to see him go down for anything- even this, because of campaign finance illegality but I don't care who he bumps uglies with and don't really hold the "act" against him.

 

Agree. I think most of us do. Problem is he paid for it as President and we have every reason to believe he did it when he did to cover it up during the campaign. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, Chachie said:

 

 

Honestly, I never cared much about that either. Consensual stuff. Should not matter in the big picture. As an admitted hater, I'd love to see him go down for anything- even this, because of campaign finance illegality but I don't care who he bumps uglies with and don't really hold the "act" against him.

 

Isn't that what took down John Edwards?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, Barry.Randolphe said:

 

Isn't that what took down John Edwards?

 

He was indicted on felony charges but  he was done for having an affair and knocking up a women after his wife was diagnosed with breast cancer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, CousinsCowgirl84 said:

 

 

The logic that “Republicans did something foolish so now democrats have every right to act foolish” is foolish. I can only guess that is your point... the republicans did it so why can’t the democrats? Right?

I think perhaps the logic is Republicans impeached Clinton over the one so...

And Trump's behavior is actually criminal in addition to immoral.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, RedskinsFan44 said:

I think perhaps the logic is Republicans impeached Clinton over the one so...

And Trump's behavior is actually criminal in addition to 

Well, to be precise, Clinton was impeached because he committed perjury not because he got a blowjob.  Like Trump, Clinton had his fair share of shadiness, misogyny and sexual assaults.  Maybe the Dems will catch Trump in a similar trap.  My guess is that he will be impeached, but will finish out his term.  75% chance he gets charged with something and 25% chance he's found guilty.

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, HoustonSkin said:

Well, to be precise, Clinton was impeached because he committed perjury not because he got a blowjob.  Like Trump, Clinton had his fair share of shadiness, misogyny and sexual assaults.  Maybe the Dems will catch Trump in a similar trap.  My guess is that he will be impeached, but will finish out his term.  75% chance he gets charged with something and 25% chance he's found guilty.

 

 

 

To also be precise, Trump's legal issue is not that he was cheating on his pregnant wife with 1 pornstar and 1 playmate, it's that he paid them hush money not to talk about it during his campaign for the presidency, and covered it up, which are felony campaign finance law violations.  

 

Edit:  I'll go with 50% chance he gets impeached by the House, 0% chance he's found guilty in the Senate.  90% chance he gets charged and convicted of something upon leaving office. 

Edited by PleaseBlitz
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, HoustonSkin said:

Well, to be precise, Clinton was impeached because he committed perjury not because he got a blowjob.  Like Trump, Clinton had his fair share of shadiness, misogyny and sexual assaults.  Maybe the Dems will catch Trump in a similar trap.  My guess is that he will be impeached, but will finish out his term.  75% chance he gets charged with something and 25% chance he's found guilty.

 

 

 

All this is true, but the hypocrisy comes in when the GOP says "the scope of the investigation is too big."   The Clinton-Monica-Perjury stuff all began with the White water investigation which produced absolutely nothing.  Then it continued to morph until it lead to something they could corner Clinton on, which was the affair.  Out of all the supposed sinister things the GOP thought they could nail Clinton on, the actual impeachment ended up being him lying under oath about a BJ.   

 

How about Hillary and Benghazi.  Every single time they investigated, she was found to have done nothing wrong, but they kept holding hearings over and over again.

 

Again, the hypocrisy is off the charts on this overall issue of "wide net investigations"  There is a reason Trump said 2 years ago he didn't want people looking into his finances, and I am pretty sure it's not because he might have made a filing error in good faith.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, CousinsCowgirl84 said:

 

 

The logic that “Republicans did something foolish so now democrats have every right to act foolish” is foolish. I can only guess that is your point... the republicans did it so why can’t the democrats? Right?

NoCalMike pretty much summed it up.  I wasn't condoning the Dems doing something hypothetically so much as pointing out the GOP hypocrisy. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, HoustonSkin said:

Well, to be precise, Clinton was impeached because he committed perjury not because he got a blowjob. 

 

Well, to be precise, Clinton was impeached because the GOP had spent four years abusing Congress' powers to conduct a political opposition research fishing expedition, the voters had finally gotten fed up with it and it had cost them some seats, and the lame ducks needed something that they could pretend retroactively justified the expedition. 

Edited by Larry
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

51 minutes ago, Larry said:

 

Well, to be precise, Clinton was impeached because the GOP had spent four years abusing Congress' powers to conduct a political opposition research fishing expedition, the voters had finally gotten fed up with it and it had cost them some seats, and the lame ducks needed something that they could pretend retroactively justified the expedition. 

 

 

 

Bill Clinton was impeached for obstruction of justice and if Nixon had not resigned, he was facing the same charge.

 

Donnie T has obstructed justice about 500 times since 2016.

Edited by Chachie
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Clinton was impeached for 2 things:  Lying to a grand jury (about Lewinsky) and also obstruction of justice.  There were, i believe, 2 other articles of impeachment that did not pass the House.  I forget what they were. 

 

Trump will never, ever go in front of a grand jury, because he can't open his mouth without lying, and you are correct, he obstructs justice, publicly, on freaking Twitter, on a seemingly daily basis.  

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...