Moose & Squirrel v Boris & Natasha: what's the deal with the rooskies and trumpland?

[TheDoyler23]

2 hours ago, Burgold said:

Handing over the keys to the Kingdom for the price of an ego massage.

 

And perhaps the deletion of the pee tape?

 

(Putin probably killing whomever possess it, that is. That's his style...) 

[Bang]

Oh cool, a cease fire between supposed cooperative forces.

Anyone tell ISIS?

 

Honestly. 

What. The. ****??

 

~Bang

Edited July 8, 2017 by Bang

[AsburySkinsFan]

48 minutes ago, Weganator said:

 

If there was no proof that the person was here illegally, I would be for stopping their deportation.

But this dumbass administration is calling for an end to the investigation to determine which crimes were committed. You guys on the Right only want to hamstring law enforcement when they are investigating your corporate overlords and politicos. It really is disgusting.

[AsburySkinsFan]

44 minutes ago, Bang said:

Oh cool, a cease fire between supposed cooperative forces.

Anyone tell ISIS?

 

Honestly. 

What. The. ****??

 

~Bang

Wow, ISIS must be defeated now. This must have been Trump's secret plan.

59 minutes ago, RedskinsFan44 said:

How significant is a cease-fire between two parties who arent firing on each other?

Here's my question, if we bomb Syria because they drop another sarin bomb will that mean that we've violated the cease fire?

Edited July 8, 2017 by AsburySkinsFan

[TradeTheBeal!]

Trump's fealty to Putin in light of the overwhelming evidence of Russian interference in our election process could certainly be interpreted as collusion...by a reasonable person.

[LadySkinsFan]

Trump just gave a bigly **** you to the United States election process. And it is collusion to cooperate in "cyber security issues" with our enemy. Letting them know our weaknesses? The intelligence and cyber agencies must be freaking out. 

 

As should we all.

 

Traitor

 

The Trump minions must all be asleep still. Where is there approbation? Maybe they haven't gotten the talking points yet.

Edited July 8, 2017 by LadySkinsFan

[Sacks 'n' Stuff]

1 hour ago, Weganator said:

If there was no proof that the person was here illegally, I would be for stopping their deportation.

I think he was referring to the hacking, not collusion.

[Larry]

4 hours ago, LD0506 said:

 

So pretty much exactly what everyone expected, right?

 

 

 

Yep.  Pretty much everyone in this thread is assuming exactly what they assumed, before the meeting.  

 

[LD0506]

If I drop a brick, I don't need to see it hit, I am pretty comfortable assuming that it isn't going to go flying off into the sky.

[Larry]

2 hours ago, RedskinsFan44 said:

How significant is a cease-fire between two parties who arent firing on each other?

 

If we weren't firing at each other, or at least threatening to, then it wouldn't be nearly as big a crisis.  

 

My concern with this "cease fire" (other than the fact that it doesn't stand a chance of lasting) is, does this mean that the next time a Russian jet drops a Syrian chemical weapon on a village of civilians that the rebels just took away from ISIL, we won't do anything to protect them?  

[FanboyOf91]

[Larry]

6 minutes ago, FanboyOf91 said:

 

So, fake news?  

[visionary]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Edited July 8, 2017 by visionary

[LadySkinsFan]

3 hours ago, TheDoyler23 said:

 

And perhaps the deletion of the pee tape?

 

 

Putin will delete a COPY, the original is too valuable.

[DCranon21]

So have the Trumpets received their marching orders yet for Press Security Hanitty err l mean Spicer or whoever is spewing the propaganda on this? I mean there has to be an explanation to this right?

[Llevron]

I don't understand why it's legal for them to do alot of the stuff they do. Most of all I don't understand the family dynamic we have going on here. How is this ok to anyone? 

[killerbee99]

5 minutes ago, Llevron said:

I don't understand why it's legal for them to do alot of the stuff they do. Most of all I don't understand the family dynamic we have going on here. How is this ok to anyone? 

I mean why have a vice president when you can send your hot daughter who has no clue.... Running the country like his ****ty businesses...... And we know how a majority of those turned out

[mistertim]

7 minutes ago, killerbee99 said:

I mean why have a vice president when you can send your hot daughter who has no clue.... Running the country like his ****ty businesses...... And we know how a majority of those turned out

 

I don't think we would have been much better off with Pence sitting at that table.

 

[visionary]

 

 

 

[justice98]

He literally finds a way to embarrass us at every opportunity.

[AsburySkinsFan]

2 minutes ago, justice98 said:

He literally finds a way to embarrass us at every opportunity.

Not for his true believers, he could take a dump in their hand and they'd be convinced it was the most Presidential act since the Gettysburg Address.

[Cooked Crack]

6 minutes ago, AsburySkinsFan said:

Not for his true believers, he could take a dump in their hand and they'd be convinced it was the most Presidential act since the Gettysburg Address.

Modern Day Defecation

[skinny21]

1 hour ago, Llevron said:

I don't understand why it's legal for them to do alot of the stuff they do. Most of all I don't understand the family dynamic we have going on here. How is this ok to anyone? 

I believe it's legal because it was understood that certain things are not done.  There used to be respect for the office.  We're seeing numerous 'traditions' broken by this administration.  Traditions that were based on common sense and common decency.  Depending on how things shake out in the midterms and beyond, my guess is a lot of these traditions will be turned into law to prevent their reoccurrence.  

[LadySkinsFan]

Nepotism is against the law, unfortunately we have an Attorney General who won't enforce the law. If he did, no more Ivanka and Jared in our government. 

 

Also, Democrats pretty silent on this. 

 

I have to look it up, but I think nepotism law was passed after Bobby Kennedy was appointed Attorney General. I will update when I do some research.

 

Update: Yes, the anti-nepotism law was passed in 1967, LBJ shepherded the bill through Congress in response to JFK's appointment of RFK as Attorney General.

 

http://www.npr.org/2017/01/05/508382236/trump-relatives-potential-white-house-roles-could-test-anti-nepotism-law

 

DOJ determined that Trump appointing Ivanka and Jared doesn't violate law. So Sessions won't enforce the law.

 

http://www.cnn.com/2017/01/21/politics/jared-kushner-white-house-job-justice-department-ruling/index.html

 

 

Edited July 8, 2017 by LadySkinsFan

[AlvinWaltonIsMyBoy]

Putin denying and Trump accepting reminds me of the scene in Back to School when Ned Beatty asks Rodney Dangerfield if he cheated on his exams.