Jump to content
Washington Football Team Logo
Extremeskins

Moose & Squirrel v Boris & Natasha: what's the deal with the rooskies and trumpland?


Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Burgold said:

Handing over the keys to the Kingdom for the price of an ego massage.

 

And perhaps the deletion of the pee tape?

 

(Putin probably killing whomever possess it, that is. That's his style...) 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
48 minutes ago, Weganator said:

 

If there was no proof that the person was here illegally, I would be for stopping their deportation.

But this dumbass administration is calling for an end to the investigation to determine which crimes were committed. You guys on the Right only want to hamstring law enforcement when they are investigating your corporate overlords and politicos. It really is disgusting.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
44 minutes ago, Bang said:

Oh cool, a cease fire between supposed cooperative forces.

Anyone tell ISIS?

 

Honestly. 

What. The. ****??

 

~Bang

Wow, ISIS must be defeated now. This must have been Trump's secret plan.

59 minutes ago, RedskinsFan44 said:

How significant is a cease-fire between two parties who arent firing on each other?

Here's my question, if we bomb Syria because they drop another sarin bomb will that mean that we've violated the cease fire?

Edited by AsburySkinsFan
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Trump just gave a bigly **** you to the United States election process. And it is collusion to cooperate in "cyber security issues" with our enemy. Letting them know our weaknesses? The intelligence and cyber agencies must be freaking out. 

 

As should we all.

 

Traitor

 

The Trump minions must all be asleep still. Where is there approbation? Maybe they haven't gotten the talking points yet.

Edited by LadySkinsFan
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, LD0506 said:

 

So pretty much exactly what everyone expected, right?

 

 

 

Yep.  Pretty much everyone in this thread is assuming exactly what they assumed, before the meeting.  

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, RedskinsFan44 said:

How significant is a cease-fire between two parties who arent firing on each other?

 

If we weren't firing at each other, or at least threatening to, then it wouldn't be nearly as big a crisis.  

 

My concern with this "cease fire" (other than the fact that it doesn't stand a chance of lasting) is, does this mean that the next time a Russian jet drops a Syrian chemical weapon on a village of civilians that the rebels just took away from ISIL, we won't do anything to protect them?  

Link to post
Share on other sites

So have the Trumpets received their marching orders yet for Press Security Hanitty err l mean Spicer or whoever is spewing the propaganda on this? I mean there has to be an explanation to this right?

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Llevron said:

I don't understand why it's legal for them to do alot of the stuff they do. Most of all I don't understand the family dynamic we have going on here. How is this ok to anyone? 

I mean why have a vice president when you can send your hot daughter who has no clue.... Running the country like his ****ty businesses...... And we know how a majority of those turned out

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, killerbee99 said:

I mean why have a vice president when you can send your hot daughter who has no clue.... Running the country like his ****ty businesses...... And we know how a majority of those turned out

 

I don't think we would have been much better off with Pence sitting at that table.

 

809911566-Mike-Pence-NASA-Do-Not-Touch.j

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Llevron said:

I don't understand why it's legal for them to do alot of the stuff they do. Most of all I don't understand the family dynamic we have going on here. How is this ok to anyone? 

I believe it's legal because it was understood that certain things are not done.  There used to be respect for the office.  We're seeing numerous 'traditions' broken by this administration.  Traditions that were based on common sense and common decency.  Depending on how things shake out in the midterms and beyond, my guess is a lot of these traditions will be turned into law to prevent their reoccurrence.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nepotism is against the law, unfortunately we have an Attorney General who won't enforce the law. If he did, no more Ivanka and Jared in our government. 

 

Also, Democrats pretty silent on this. 

 

I have to look it up, but I think nepotism law was passed after Bobby Kennedy was appointed Attorney General. I will update when I do some research.

 

Update: Yes, the anti-nepotism law was passed in 1967, LBJ shepherded the bill through Congress in response to JFK's appointment of RFK as Attorney General.

 

http://www.npr.org/2017/01/05/508382236/trump-relatives-potential-white-house-roles-could-test-anti-nepotism-law

 

DOJ determined that Trump appointing Ivanka and Jared doesn't violate law. So Sessions won't enforce the law.

 

http://www.cnn.com/2017/01/21/politics/jared-kushner-white-house-job-justice-department-ruling/index.html

 

 

Edited by LadySkinsFan
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...