Cooked Crack Posted July 19, 2018 Share Posted July 19, 2018 Tim Scott has now done more to oppose Trump than Jeff Flake has and he didn't do it on purpose. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AsburySkinsFan Posted July 19, 2018 Share Posted July 19, 2018 Tad Devine joined the Bernie Sanders campaign in 2014 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AsburySkinsFan Posted July 19, 2018 Share Posted July 19, 2018 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted July 19, 2018 Share Posted July 19, 2018 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LadySkinsFan Posted July 19, 2018 Share Posted July 19, 2018 1 hour ago, NoCalMike said: It's been awhile since the debates but I remember one of the exchanges between Trump & Hillary basically was Hillary saying that certain industries like Coal are going out of business (and for good reason) and that the gov't should be providing new training on current and future industries that will provide job security in the present and for future generations. Trump's response was basically, "Nah....Coal is awesome!" See Democrat Party platform 2016 for job training programs proposed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoCalMike Posted July 19, 2018 Share Posted July 19, 2018 51 minutes ago, LadySkinsFan said: See Democrat Party platform 2016 for job training programs proposed. Right and really in general the (D) platform has been to invest in the people in order to make a better future, while the GOP platform has basically been...."pull yourself up by your bootstraps......if you can afford boots, that is" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kilmer17 Posted July 19, 2018 Share Posted July 19, 2018 1 hour ago, AsburySkinsFan said: Tad Devine joined the Bernie Sanders campaign in 2014 What’s the implication? That Trump AND Sanders colluded? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TradeTheBeal! Posted July 19, 2018 Share Posted July 19, 2018 2 minutes ago, Kilmer17 said: What’s the implication? That Trump AND Sanders colluded? There is little doubt that the fringiest element of the Sanders base was heavily influenced by Russian-sourced, anti-Hillary misinformation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PF Chang Posted July 19, 2018 Share Posted July 19, 2018 11 minutes ago, Kilmer17 said: What’s the implication? That Trump AND Sanders colluded? Mueller seems interested in coordination of the timing of the Wikileaks email dump the day before the Dem convention. I guess it depends how much Devine knew about the source of the emails. Guessing he is one of the 5 witnesses that Mueller is seeking immunity for in the Manafort trial. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skinsmarydu Posted July 19, 2018 Share Posted July 19, 2018 I wasn't one of em. I just thought Bernie offered more of the change I want. Going hard left wouldn't really be feasible, but I thought he would really fight for the little guy more than Hillary. I voted for Bernie in the primary and Hillary in the general. ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Llevron Posted July 19, 2018 Share Posted July 19, 2018 I have no issue at all if the burn gets caught up on this. And I'm happy they are investigating it. Not only does it show fairness, but I want all the Russians out of our government. I dont think it's too much to ask for our elected officials to be above this ****. Sorry burn but even if it's you I really dont give a damn. Gotstago 2 minutes ago, skinsmarydu said: I wasn't one of em. I just thought Bernie offered more of the change I want. Going hard left wouldn't really be feasible, but I thought he would really fight for the little guy more than Hillary. I voted for Bernie in the primary and Hillary in the general. ? I was totally a burnie bro until I had to be Hilldog hoe Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skinsmarydu Posted July 19, 2018 Share Posted July 19, 2018 Nice freestyle? ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Llevron Posted July 19, 2018 Share Posted July 19, 2018 2 minutes ago, skinsmarydu said: Nice freestyle? ? Naw I'm not that talented. It's just top 3 of my favorite words and it rhymed so why not lls Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AsburySkinsFan Posted July 19, 2018 Share Posted July 19, 2018 51 minutes ago, Kilmer17 said: What’s the implication? That Trump AND Sanders colluded? Just posting a tweet. I made no conclusions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PeterMP Posted July 20, 2018 Share Posted July 20, 2018 1 hour ago, Kilmer17 said: What’s the implication? That Trump AND Sanders colluded? From my reading, it seems unlikely. Remember, the Manafort stuff mostly goes back years. Devine worked in the same law form as Manfort back when the Russian-puppet was trying to become President of Ukraine (don't remember the guys name). Manafort's law firm was working for that guy (who would then later help embezzle dirty Russian money out of Russia (with Manafort's help)). Devine quit about that time. This is all ended back in 2010 though and Devine quit. I haven't seen any dates on these e-mails, but it seems like Devine was starting to understand things were dirty and got out, and these e-mails are part of the paper trial where Devine was starting to understand they were really working for the Russians, and this guy was a Russian puppet. (Now, this doesn't rule out that later around 2016 Devine and Manafort weren't working together against Hillary (with Russia), but it doesn't seem like that is a necessity either. And certainly in 2016, Devine should have known that Manafort was dirty.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoCalMike Posted July 20, 2018 Share Posted July 20, 2018 I would assume it means it's possible someone in the Bernie campaign may have caught wind of Russia's willingness to take down Hillary, and they wanted a piece of the action. The idea that Bernie himself was involved, however, is highly unlikely. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
China Posted July 20, 2018 Share Posted July 20, 2018 Could the Trump hotel lose its liquor license because of the president’s character? Last week, an Advisory Neighborhood Commission voted unanimously to support a petition that seeks to revoke the Trump International Hotel’s liquor license on the grounds that its owner — you know, the president of the United States — is not of “good character.” The ANC is not even the one where the luxury hotel is located. During its July 11 meeting, the commissioners of ANC 4C — which represents Petworth, Columbia Heights and other neighborhoods north of Trump’s downtown property — voted 8 to 0 to support a complaint that looks to strip the hotel of its liquor license. In June, a group of religious and judicial leaders petitioned the D.C. Alcoholic Beverage Control Board to force the Trump hotel to justify why it should keep its alcohol permit when D.C. law states that license applicants must be of “good character and generally fit for the responsibilities of licensure.” “It is our considered view that Donald Trump, the true and actual owner of the Trump International Hotel, is not a person of good character, doesn’t meet the D.C. Code … requirements and therefore the license should be revoked,” ANC 4C chairman, Bennett Hilley, and vice chair, Charlotte Nugent, wrote in a letter to the director of the Alcoholic Beverage Regulation Administration. (The emphasis, incidentally, was the authors’.) Click on the link for the full article Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PeterMP Posted July 20, 2018 Share Posted July 20, 2018 4 minutes ago, NoCalMike said: I would assume it means it's possible someone in the Bernie campaign may have caught wind of Russia's willingness to take down Hillary, and they wanted a piece of the action. The idea that Bernie himself was involved, however, is highly unlikely. I looked the dates on the e-mails between Devine and Manafort are most recently from 2010. That's when they were working together on political stuff in the Ukraine. There are more recent ones with Devine on them (2014), but those don't include Manafort and include R. Gates (who I would assume is Robert Gates). Probably Devine telling Gates what he knows about Manafort. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bang Posted July 20, 2018 Share Posted July 20, 2018 Wouldn't one fringe or the other satisfy the plan of destabilizing? ~Bang Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoCalMike Posted July 20, 2018 Share Posted July 20, 2018 I kind of hope the right wing media picks up on Devine and goes full hysteria mode just so it can in turn justify the entire investigation (not that it needs further justification at this point). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Llevron Posted July 20, 2018 Share Posted July 20, 2018 10 minutes ago, Bang said: Wouldn't one fringe or the other satisfy the plan of destabilizing? ~Bang Someone else on here says this alot but I cant remember who it is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larry Posted July 20, 2018 Share Posted July 20, 2018 1 hour ago, Bang said: Wouldn't one fringe or the other satisfy the plan of destabilizing? ~Bang I wouldn't have any trouble believing that Putin figured Hillary would win, but he wanted her to take office weak. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nonniey Posted July 20, 2018 Share Posted July 20, 2018 2 hours ago, China said: Could the Trump hotel lose its liquor license because of the president’s character? Last week, an Advisory Neighborhood Commission voted unanimously to support a petition that seeks to revoke the Trump International Hotel’s liquor license on the grounds that its owner — you know, the president of the United States — is not of “good character.” The ANC is not even the one where the luxury hotel is located. During its July 11 meeting, the commissioners of ANC 4C — which represents Petworth, Columbia Heights and other neighborhoods north of Trump’s downtown property — voted 8 to 0 to support a complaint that looks to strip the hotel of its liquor license. In June, a group of religious and judicial leaders petitioned the D.C. Alcoholic Beverage Control Board to force the Trump hotel to justify why it should keep its alcohol permit when D.C. law states that license applicants must be of “good character and generally fit for the responsibilities of licensure.” “It is our considered view that Donald Trump, the true and actual owner of the Trump International Hotel, is not a person of good character, doesn’t meet the D.C. Code … requirements and therefore the license should be revoked,” ANC 4C chairman, Bennett Hilley, and vice chair, Charlotte Nugent, wrote in a letter to the director of the Alcoholic Beverage Regulation Administration. (The emphasis, incidentally, was the authors’.) Click on the link for the full article This sort of activity helps Trump politically. Been telling ya'll the resistance is going to get Trump reelected. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Switchgear Posted July 20, 2018 Share Posted July 20, 2018 1 hour ago, nonniey said: This sort of activity helps Trump politically. Been telling ya'll the resistance is going to get Trump reelected. You think everything helps Trump. You coming here and repeatedly getting thrashed helps Trump, in your mind. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sacks 'n' Stuff Posted July 20, 2018 Share Posted July 20, 2018 7 hours ago, nonniey said: This sort of activity helps Trump politically. Been telling ya'll the resistance is going to get Trump reelected. Last week there was like a three day window in between any children being taken from their parents and the latest round of Mueller indictments and the right wingers were in here all like, "The left has jumped the shark!" and "The left is worse and it's not even close!!". This week the President committed treason on a world stage and two days later the entire GOP is back to doing everything they can to keep people from finding out what the **** is going on or to keep Russia from attacking us in the future. At this point, "Republican" treachery and scumbaggery is just business as usual but people will come up with excuses like, "Well since the left plays identity politics I have to vote for the party that sells out the country and also plays identity politics." or "A small group of people in one party is going after the traitor's liquor license so I have to vote for the party who, as a whole, is beholden to and supportive of the administration that when called upon to request the extradition of 12 spies who were indicted as part of an attack on our country, responded instead by giving serious consideration to handing over a former U.S. diplomat to the country who was and is attacking us. Seems to me the "resistance" needs to ramp it up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.