OVCChairman Posted March 19, 2018 Share Posted March 19, 2018 For whatever this is worth. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SWFLSkins Posted March 19, 2018 Share Posted March 19, 2018 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Califan007 The Constipated Posted March 19, 2018 Share Posted March 19, 2018 John KeimVerified account @john_keim Consider: A low-end signing like this helps fill CB spot; also could leave more flexibility to sign Hankins. I'm guessing they'll be aggressive there; just a guess tho Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redrobert Posted March 19, 2018 Share Posted March 19, 2018 Yeah if it was DRC and no Hankins I get Scandrick then, but the other shoe needs to drop. Please... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bang Posted March 19, 2018 Share Posted March 19, 2018 I hope there's a Hankins signing, and then a Scandrick cut. This guy's a bum. We got weaker signing him. A hole is not filled if you fill it with nothing. ~Bang Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
haithman Posted March 19, 2018 Share Posted March 19, 2018 This team is muck Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
justice98 Posted March 19, 2018 Share Posted March 19, 2018 If they can secure Hankins, they might go into this year's draft without needing 15 new starters for once. Give me a #1 RB and a starting LG out of the draft and let's do this thing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KDawg Posted March 19, 2018 Share Posted March 19, 2018 Just now, Bang said: I hope there's a Hankins signing, and then a Scandrick cut. This guy's a bum. We got weaker signing him. A hole is not filled if you fill it with nothing. ~Bang I actually agree here. Not a fan of Scandrick. A street FA signing could be of similar use. But I’m hoping to be wrong on this one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OVCChairman Posted March 19, 2018 Share Posted March 19, 2018 Just now, KDawg said: I actually agree here. Not a fan of Scandrick. A street FA signing could be of similar use. But I’m hoping to be wrong on this one. I'm not really excited about this either... who knows. He appears to be inexpensive, so that's a plus, and if it means we sign a guy like Scandrick to save money to get a guy like Hankins, i'm on board with that too. I'd almost wish we hadn't signed him and gone to work with what we got. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RWJ Posted March 19, 2018 Share Posted March 19, 2018 First EPIC fail by Allen and Co. was signing Scandrick. He scored one of the lowest ratings of all starting CBs in the NFL. Allen best sign Hankins and not say he was too expensive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reaper Skins Posted March 19, 2018 Share Posted March 19, 2018 Sounds like the Scandrick signing was our front office saying F you to DRC for playing hard ball. Way to win the deal Bruce. Who cares what the on field outcome is as long as you get the last word right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PortisBetts Posted March 19, 2018 Share Posted March 19, 2018 4 minutes ago, Bang said: I hope there's a Hankins signing, and then a Scandrick cut. This guy's a bum. We got weaker signing him. A hole is not filled if you fill it with nothing. ~Bang you can fill a hole with garbage though.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RWJ Posted March 19, 2018 Share Posted March 19, 2018 Just now, Reaper Skins said: Sounds like the Scandrick signing was our front office saying F you to DRC for playing hard ball. Way to win the deal Bruce. Who cares what the on field outcome is as long as you get the last word right? Redskins did it to themselves, dude by signing him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
carex Posted March 19, 2018 Share Posted March 19, 2018 you know, we play them twice a year and I think I remember his name in regards to negative things happening to the Skins rather than positive Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rogue Jedi Posted March 19, 2018 Share Posted March 19, 2018 Signing Scandrick is about what I’d expect from Bruce. The icing on the cake would be drafting Guice at 13 and his failure will be complete. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
justice98 Posted March 19, 2018 Share Posted March 19, 2018 Down Breeland and Fuller, come back with Scandrick. Not great, but I will assume that's not the end of it for corner. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nonniey Posted March 19, 2018 Share Posted March 19, 2018 22 minutes ago, Tay said: At this point our remaining holes are at RB, LG, Hankins, and depth. Hopefully we fill another one of those holes today. So if we fill one of the holes with inflated balloons does that mean it is filled? (ie Scandrick) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
abdcskins Posted March 19, 2018 Share Posted March 19, 2018 Scandrick is a meh signing for me. I wouldn't be opposed to using a late round pick on a corner. It's a position that needs the most depth imo. As far as I can tell we only have 5 on the roster including Scandrick. I see Joshua Holsey is still on the roster, but I can't recall ever seeing him in action. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Burgold Posted March 19, 2018 Share Posted March 19, 2018 Contract seems cheap enough that best players should play. If Holsey, Moreau, Dunbar outplay Scandrick in OTAs and preseason then he’s vet insurance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RWJ Posted March 19, 2018 Share Posted March 19, 2018 1 minute ago, Rogue Jedi said: Signing Scandrick is about what I’d expect from Bruce. The icing on the cake would be drafting Guice at 13 and his failure will be complete. That could happen. I thought about that today. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
markmills67 Posted March 19, 2018 Share Posted March 19, 2018 I'm taking my little girl to bed will be about 30 minutes, if no Hankins signing I might just self combust. HTTR Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nonniey Posted March 19, 2018 Share Posted March 19, 2018 25 minutes ago, MartinC said: "Up to" would be the key words there I hope. Actually I think crappy is the key word. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tay Posted March 19, 2018 Share Posted March 19, 2018 2 minutes ago, nonniey said: So if we fill one of the holes with inflated balloons does that mean it is filled? (ie Scandrick) My hope is that it's just a depth signing, and Holsey beats him out in training camp. I would prefer DRC, but I'd also prefer an impact player on the DLine over DRC. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Califan007 The Constipated Posted March 19, 2018 Share Posted March 19, 2018 I'm thinking of how Cowboys fans were jubilant when they finally got rid of Terence Newman because he was old, slow and always injured. Shell of his former self. Bengals and Vikings took a shot, primarily because of Zimmer. Worked out incredibly well for both teams. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RWJ Posted March 19, 2018 Share Posted March 19, 2018 I don't want to hear this crap from Allen that they did all they could but couldn't meet his demands. Sorry Allen you used that on KC. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.