Jump to content
Washington Football Team Logo
Extremeskins

The Unofficial "Elon Musk trying to "Save Everyone" from Themselves (except his Step-Sister)" Thread...


Renegade7

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Spaceman Spiff said:


Lmaooooo crazy no way. 

 


There needs to be a name for someone who trolls more than half of his users on a platform he owns. Hilarious. 

 

If that thread about hashtags for child porn existing on Twitter is true, then how the **** was this not addressed before?


And Elon with his image for Trump, that should really reassure those advertisers concerned whether the platform will protect their brand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


The thread:


Firing requires a breach of a term in the employee's contract. Even then 2 written warnings are expected. You can lay people off. That requires notice and compensation by local law and written documentation submitted to local governments explaining why the layoffs are necessary.

 

Legally all these people are still employed, even though they have now apparently been shut out of Twitter networks. Lawsuits are coming.

 

Elon also asked his remaining employees to work long hours. But for his remaining employees here, doing so requires notifying the local government and the union. There entities have the right to enquire about the necessity of this. So this is another legal breach.
 

Elon has taken over a global company and is acting like it is a purely American entity. And only seems to care about its cultural impact in that country. This all supports the idea that his reason to takeover the company is politically driven.
 

But 4D chess am I right?

 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Corcaigh said:

 

If that thread about hashtags for child porn existing on Twitter is true, then how the **** was this not addressed before?


And Elon with his image for Trump, that should really reassure those advertisers concerned whether the platform will protect their brand.


In any one given day, the FBI and your state law enforcement does more to stop child abuse and trafficking than all the tweets that all the Qs have ever tweeted in history.  Elizableu and her online hashtag police ain’t doing **** for anybody.

Edited by TradeTheBeal!
  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, TradeTheBeal! said:


In any one given day, the FBI and your state law enforcement does more to stop child abuse and trafficking than all the tweets that all the Qs have ever tweeted in history.  Elizableu and her online hashtag police ain’t doing **** for anybody.


SpacemanSpiff is a Q follower now?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Califan007 The Constipated said:

Firing requires a breach of a term in the employee's contract. Even then 2 written warnings are expected. You can lay people off. That requires notice and compensation by local law and written documentation submitted to local governments explaining why the layoffs are necessary.

 

Legally all these people are still employed, even though they have now apparently been shut out of Twitter networks. Lawsuits are coming.

 

This is like my dream scenario.  Keep paying me, but I don't have to, and can't, work.  ****, can Elon Musk buy my law firm?????

  • Haha 8
  • Super Duper Ain't No Party Pooper Two Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Corcaigh said:

 

If that thread about hashtags for child porn existing on Twitter is true, then how the **** was this not addressed before?


twitters moderation was ass.  People panicked when Mr. Burns took over, but I’m struggling to see what’s changed outside of splashy unbanning of well known villains.  Prior to this, tweets that were blatantly hateful would comeback with something like “we checked and found nothing wrong with this tweet.”  Meanwhile people that were brigaded would get banned or warnings, even if the tweets were relatively tame.  It honestly felt like despite all the talk of content moderation, twitter was relying on software that triggered actions based on how many warnings they received.  
 

Child porn is essentially radioactive.  First of all having it on your various devices can trigger charges all by itself.  Second, it’s one of the extremely rare subsets of media that actually causes you harm just by seeing it.  It will **** your mind up and send your into a therapists office in despair.  This is one of the very few hazards FBI agents and content moderators share.  No one that isn’t a child advocate or a monster disguised as a person goes looking for it.  It does not go viral.

 

so if I’m right, and twitter was poorly managed enough to be relying on volume of reports to escalate to a human moderator seeing it or automated action… then it’s possible this sort of material would get lost in the shuffle.  It’s unlikely to generate mountains of reports because it’s not going to get the traffic Kanye tweeting out wild **** (an instance where twitter moved relatively quickly to delete it) is likely to generate.  

  • Like 2
  • Sad 1
  • Thumb up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Elon was never going to keep Trump banned.  Controversy drives clicks on twitter just as it does on every news site we all visit.  They aren’t going to stop reporting every Trump statement for the same reasons Elon wants him back.  Now he’s having fun trolling Trump until he comes back.

 

I’m more alarmed by him unbanning Project Veritas than Trump. They don’t drive attention to the site, they just spread a constant stream of misinformation.

  • Like 2
  • Sad 1
  • Thumb up 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://www.newsweek.com/musk-irony-vox-populi-trump-quote-1761051?amp=1
 

I find it hight doubtful Musk wasn’t aware of the full quote when he posted it. Have no evidence to back that up of course but it’s just the feeling I get.

 

Still a dumb choice to unban Trump, and the rest of the people he has unbanned.


John Oliver has had the best take on Musks takeover of Twitter so far.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Destino said:


twitters moderation was ass.  People panicked when Mr. Burns took over, but I’m struggling to see what’s changed outside of splashy unbanning of well known villains.  Prior to this, tweets that were blatantly hateful would comeback with something like “we checked and found nothing wrong with this tweet.”  Meanwhile people that were brigaded would get banned or warnings, even if the tweets were relatively tame.  It honestly felt like despite all the talk of content moderation, twitter was relying on software that triggered actions based on how many warnings they received.  
 

Child porn is essentially radioactive.  First of all having it on your various devices can trigger charges all by itself.  Second, it’s one of the extremely rare subsets of media that actually causes you harm just by seeing it.  It will **** your mind up and send your into a therapists office in despair.  This is one of the very few hazards FBI agents and content moderators share.  No one that isn’t a child advocate or a monster disguised as a person goes looking for it.  It does not go viral.

 

so if I’m right, and twitter was poorly managed enough to be relying on volume of reports to escalate to a human moderator seeing it or automated action… then it’s possible this sort of material would get lost in the shuffle.  It’s unlikely to generate mountains of reports because it’s not going to get the traffic Kanye tweeting out wild **** (an instance where twitter moved relatively quickly to delete it) is likely to generate.  


pffffft, did you read @TradeTheBeal!’s post? The FBI does more in an afternoon!

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Spaceman Spiff said:


pffffft, did you read @TradeTheBeal!’s post? The FBI does more in an afternoon!

They probably do though…  still pretty retarded to take pot shots at any positive steps that are taken to protect children though.
 

There are plenty of legitimate things to attack Elon on, don’t have to take pot shots at him over stuff he is actually improving.

Edited by CousinsCowgirl84
  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
  • Thumb down 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Passepartout said:

Elon is a toxic, hostile, workplace environment boss there. As with four companies as heard on Youtube that he works 121 hours a week and does not take vacations. Really you need to have a life there. As he is one not to give you a life. It is all work, work, work!! :(


168 hours in a week.

-56 hours to sleep/shower/groom/eat.  (20 year olds can get away with sleeping four hours a night, 50 year olds like Musk start to hear death creeping up on them if they go a single week without a full nights sleep.)

112 hours remain to work and deal with his private life.

Elon does not work 121 hours a week without a Time Machine.  He’s definitely not making so many babies if he never vacations and works every waking hour.

 

Elon is a bull****ter.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Destino said:


168 hours in a week.

-56 hours to sleep/shower/groom/eat.  (20 year olds can get away with sleeping four hours a night, 50 year olds like Musk start to hear death creeping up on them if they go a single week without a full nights sleep.)

112 hours remain to work and deal with his private life.

Elon does not work 121 hours a week without a Time Machine.  He’s definitely not making so many babies if he never vacations and works every waking hour.

 

Elon is a bull****ter.

 

I think he considers trolling on Twitter work...I guess it is, technically.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   1 member

×
×
  • Create New...