No Excuses

The Impeachment Thread

Impeachment  

193 members have voted

  1. 1. Should Donald Trump be impeached for obstruction of justice?



Recommended Posts

17 minutes ago, illone said:

Those polls always crack me up.  The ES poll above is the same sample size of people.

 

The ES poll is not done in a scientific way as CNN, Gallup, etc polls are. Quite a big difference. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
57 minutes ago, mistertim said:

 

The ES poll is not done in a scientific way as CNN, Gallup, etc polls are. Quite a big difference. 

 

 

we have a major obstacle in the tailgate called "the twa effect" that makes it hard to really do anything based on actual science

 

  • Haha 10

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Jumbo said:

 

 

we have a major obstacle in the tailgate called "the twa effect" that makes it hard to really do anything based on actual science

 

 

You are just grumpy after the head transplant went awry.

there is a learning curve.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So a bit earlier I put on my trusty gas mask and sauntered over to Breitbart to check on their reaction to the judge ruling that McGahn must testify. 

 

Would you be surprised to find out that roughly 50% of the comments had to do with the Judge's name (Ketanji Brown Jackson) or that, out of those, roughly 70% mentioned that she probably got the job because of affirmative action?

 

Didn't think so. 

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, twa said:

 

You are just grumpy after the head transplant went awry.

 

 

 

 

abby brain.jpg

  • Like 1
  • Haha 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, mistertim said:

 

The ES poll is not done in a scientific way as CNN, Gallup, etc polls are. Quite a big difference. 

 

 

I am a denier of non-science.

  • Haha 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, mistertim said:

So a bit earlier I put on my trusty gas mask and sauntered over to Breitbart to check on their reaction to the judge ruling that McGahn must testify. 

 

Would you be surprised to find out that roughly 50% of the comments had to do with the Judge's name (Ketanji Brown Jackson) or that, out of those, roughly 70% mentioned that she probably got the job because of affirmative action?

 

Didn't think so. 

 

“Economic Anxiety”

  • Like 1
  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, mistertim said:

So a bit earlier I put on my trusty gas mask and sauntered over to Breitbart to check on their reaction to the judge ruling that McGahn must testify. 

 

Would you be surprised to find out that roughly 50% of the comments had to do with the Judge's name (Ketanji Brown Jackson) or that, out of those, roughly 70% mentioned that she probably got the job because of affirmative action?

 

Didn't think so. 

 

She probably got into Harvard and then Harvard law because of affirmative action too.  Meantime, Breitbart people earned their station in life (largely opioid addicts, i presume). 

Edited by PleaseBlitz
  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

America is ****ed and deservedly so. Witness after witness after witness comes through these hearings and just destroys POTUS and the GOP defenses and it barely moves the needle on public opinion. He did it... we don’t care. If Americans want to be the subjects of a stupid fat ****, who am I to get in the way.

Edited by Sacks 'n' Stuff
  • Like 1
  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Sacks 'n' Stuff said:

America is ****ed and deservedly so. Witness after witness after witness comes through these hearings and just destroys POTUS and the GOP defenses and it barely moves the needle on public opinion. He did it... we don’t care. If Americans want to be the subjects of a stupid fat ****, who am I to get in the way.

 

The impeachment hearings are basically Mueller Report part 2.  Half the country is basing their entire opinion on Barr's summary, not the actual report.  There is absolutely zero way you can come to the conclusion that Russiagate was a "hoax" after reading the actual report.  You can debate the info in the report but you can't even bring Trump supporters to that table.    With the impeachment hearings, most of them probably aren't watching without it being filtered through the opinion shows that are pretty much lying about the content.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Quote

“No, I didn’t direct him, but he is a warrior, he is a warrior,” Trump told O’Reilly in an interview streamed on the internet on Tuesday.

Giuliani has said publicly that he conducted an investigation “concerning 2016 Ukrainian collusion and corruption” on Trump’s behalf.

Asked by O’Reilly what Giuliani was doing in Ukraine, Trump said “you have to ask that to Rudy.”

“Rudy has other clients, other than me,” Trump said. “He’s done a lot of work in Ukraine over the years.”

 

  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Springfield said:


Oh, we think he had a stroke?

A stroke of good luck.  You know, that all of the impeachment inquiry hearings completely exonerated him.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Springfield said:


Oh, we think he had a stroke?

 

Something is going on. Could be a stroke. Could be an injury to his arm/shoulder from a fall. Who knows? Odd timing with his "first part" of a routine physical though. Look at any video of him from the days+

 

also

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.