Jump to content
Washington Football Team Logo
Extremeskins

The Sewer That Is The GOP: With All The White Supremacists, Conspiracy Nutters, And Other Malicious Whacko Subgroups, How Does It Get Fixed?


Jumbo

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, Califan007 said:

 

What's actually scary is that he joined up AFTER reading the language of the caucus' platform that MIG is now saying she never read lol...

 

I think the closer truth is that they signed up because of the language. They knew very well that the blatant white nationalism would whip up their Trump base even more.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The GOVERNMENT threatening private businesses. GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS THREATENING GOVERNMENTAL RETRIBUTION AGAINST PRIVATE COMPANIES THAT ARE BREAKING NO LAWS.

 

Are there any republicans left here?
Any?
Maybe?

well, just in case..


YOU ****ING MORON.

~Bang

Edited by Bang
  • Like 3
  • Haha 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gaetz, Greene flaunt new paths to power, testing GOP leaders

 

Congressional leaders have always faced rebels in their ranks. But Reps. Matt Gaetz and Marjorie Taylor Greene are presenting top House Republicans with a test of how to handle a new breed of Trump-era, social media-savvy firebrands.

 

Gaetz, a third-term Floridian, and Greene, a Georgia freshman, have attracted more public attention lately than most junior members of Congress. Much of it hasn't been positive.

 

That's confronting House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., with questions about whether the two hard-right provocateurs might hurt the GOP’s goal of capturing House control in next year’s elections. Party leaders must decide what, if anything, to do about them, and what impact any action would have on their supporters, who come from the GOP's staunchly conservative base.

 

“These are folks who operate in their own bubbles,” said former Rep. Tom Davis, R-Va., who headed the House GOP’s campaign operation. “They know how to get press, they don’t worry about being too outrageous."

 

“They have absolutely safe seats,” Davis said.

 

However, the Justice Department is investigating whether Gaetz violated sex trafficking laws and had sex with a 17-year-old girl, and McCarthy has suggested he'll take action if Gaetz is indicted.

 

And a memo linked to Greene described a proposed America First Caucus hailing “Anglo-Saxon political traditions” and warning of immigration's threat to the U.S.'s “unique culture,” prompting McCarthy to denounce “nativist dog whistles.”

 

Gaetz has denied the accusations against him, which were described by people familiar with the investigation. He hasn't been charged with any crimes and says he is “absolutely not resigning."

 

Greene called the caucus memo a staff-level proposal that she had not read from an outside group she didn't identify. She said “America First” embraces people “of every race, creed, and color," and added, “I will never back down."

 

Unlike most lawmakers, the two have sources of power that make them tough for leaders to curb. Their formulas include raising lots of money, amassing social media followers, appearing often on television, representing strongly conservative districts and being allied with former President Donald Trump, who’s still idolized by legions of Republicans.

 

Click on the link for the full article

Link to comment
Share on other sites

‘Anglo-Saxon’ Is What You Say When ‘Whites Only’ Is Too Inclusive

 

Last week, far-right Republican Representatives Marjorie Taylor Greene and Paul Gosar distanced themselves from a proposal to create an America First Caucus, after a document bearing the group’s name made reference to “Anglo-Saxon political traditions.”

 

Both Greene and Gosar told the press that they hadn’t seen the document and did not endorse its sentiments, after House Republican Leader Kevin McCarthy condemned the effort, saying that America “isn’t built on identity, race, or religion,” and rejecting “nativist dog whistles.”

 

If seeing the party of Donald Trump distance itself from nativism is strange, it helps to understand that “Anglo-Saxon” is what you say when “whites only” is simply too inclusive.

From the April 2019 issue: White nationalism’s deep American roots

 

The Anglo-Saxonism to which I refer has little to do with the Germanic peoples who settled in medieval England. Rather, it’s an archaic, pseudoscientific intellectual trend that gained popularity during the height of immigration from Eastern and Southern Europe to the United States, at the turn of the 20th century. Nativists needed a way to explain why these immigrants—Polish, Russian, Greek, Italian, and Jewish—were distinct from earlier generations, and why their presence posed a danger.


They settled on the idea that the original “native” American settlers were descended from “the tribes that met under the oak-trees of old Germany to make laws and choose chieftains,” as Francis Walker put it in The Atlantic in 1893, and that the new immigrants lacked the biological aptitude for democracy. Anglo-Saxon was a way to distinguish genteel old-money types, such as nativist Republican Senator Henry Cabot Lodge, from members of inferior races who had names such as, well, McCarthy. The influential eugenicist Madison Grant insisted that the Irish possessed an “unstable temperament” and a “lack of coordinating and reasoning power.”

 

“By making the simple (and in fact traditional) assumption that northern European nationalities shared much of the Anglo-Saxon’s inherited traits, a racial nativist could now understand why immigration had just now become a problem,” the historian John Higham wrote in Strangers in the Land. “Also, the cultural remoteness of southern and eastern European ‘races’ suggested to him that the foreign danger involved much more than an inherited incapacity for self-government: the new immigration was racially impervious to the whole of American civilization!”

This belief that America’s “original” population was Anglo-Saxon, and that the American way of life was threatened by the presence not just of nonwhite people but of inferior, non-Anglo-Saxon (or “Nordic”) white people, shaped the racist immigration-restriction laws of the early 20th century. As historians have documented, it also influenced the ideology of Nazi Germany. Translated into law, it produced such horrifying artifacts as Virginia’s 1924 anti-miscegenation act, passed with the aid of the eugenicist Anglo-Saxon Clubs. The law required all babies to be classified as “white” or “colored” and made it a felony to “misrepresent” your racial background. The Nazi jurists studying American race laws in the 1930s thought such “one drop” rules were a bit too strict.

 

Click on the link for the full article

  • Sad 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What's the point in even trying to make sense of Repub talking points? They simply spout whatever lie feels right at the moment. And it IS a lie when you know it isn't true and push it anyway. They have the same behaviors as petulant ill-bred children caught doing something wrong. 

 

Personally I am far more offended on a regular basis by the media's willingness to broadcast their lies. It seems a tad hypocritical for the media to spout off about their status and responsibilities when their toes gets stepped on but then turn right around and use their forums to advertise ****. Pick one. You are either fair and responsible arbiters and witnesses to events or you are **** salesmen, they are mutually exclusive.

 

4 minutes ago, dfitzo53 said:

Sewers serve an important public function.

 Republican transportation system?

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I saw a FB post earlier of some idiot sarcastically asking "where was Chauvin's white privilege now that he's been found guilty? hmm" kind of thing.

 

Well I think the fact that he was able to murder someone in broad daylight with his co workers standing by doing nothing classifies as white privilege.

  • Thanks 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Warhead36 said:

I saw a FB post earlier of some idiot sarcastically asking "where was Chauvin's white privilege now that he's been found guilty? hmm" kind of thing.

 

Well I think the fact that he was able to murder someone in broad daylight with his co workers standing by doing nothing classifies as white privilege.


And the fact that even though we had HD video of him murdering a black man, we were still surprised he was convicted 

  • Like 5
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...