LadySkinsFan Posted October 17, 2017 Share Posted October 17, 2017 I'm sure that they are interviewed/questioned, then sign their statements. Not under oath, can probably stop if they want their lawyer. Like giving a statement to police. Can be prosecuted if their statement is false. I wouldn't want to be "interviewed". Would get a lawyer, not answer anything. These clowns probably think that they did nothing wrong, so will go in there and answer questions. They will shut up if the interview turns I into questioning. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skinsmarydu Posted October 17, 2017 Share Posted October 17, 2017 No one gets dick squat outta me without a warrant. Straight up. No one, not for any reason. I'll ask for my husband first, still answering nothing. Then, I'll get him to call my lawyer...he knows who he is, a God around here. SAY NOTHING. you don't have to...but Jesus God we got drumpf now so who knows what? Keep it together. Stay strong, ES. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mistertim Posted October 17, 2017 Share Posted October 17, 2017 18 minutes ago, LadySkinsFan said: I'm sure that they are interviewed/questioned, then sign their statements. Not under oath, can probably stop if they want their lawyer. Like giving a statement to police. Can be prosecuted if their statement is false. I wouldn't want to be "interviewed". Would get a lawyer, not answer anything. These clowns probably think that they did nothing wrong, so will go in there and answer questions. They will shut up if the interview turns I into questioning. So if you say "Ok, but I want my lawyer there" does it then change from an "interview" into some sort of official "questioning"? I mostly just want to make sure that if any of these ****ers are caught lying they get the book thrown at them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LadySkinsFan Posted October 17, 2017 Share Posted October 17, 2017 If they want there lawyer, the can still be considered interviewing, lawyer can call a halt. They have to sign a any statement, so they can be charged with making a false statement at the least. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted October 18, 2017 Share Posted October 18, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted October 18, 2017 Share Posted October 18, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fresh8686 Posted October 18, 2017 Share Posted October 18, 2017 https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/white-house/putin-rival-ties-kushner-meeting-kremlin-bankers-n811631 " A prominent exiled Russian oligarch said in an exclusive interview with NBC News that he is nearly certain Russian President Vladimir Putin tried to collaborate with the Trump campaign, and that he believes a top Russian banker was not "acting on his own behalf" when he held a controversial meeting with Jared Kushner last December. " Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Llevron Posted October 18, 2017 Share Posted October 18, 2017 (edited) Jeff Sessions generally is making myself looks like the fool and the stooge we all think he is EDIT: Spelling. Woo lawd Edited October 18, 2017 by Llevron 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mistertim Posted October 18, 2017 Share Posted October 18, 2017 Haven't been watching it but is he trying to pull the same **** he did last time, where he refused to say Trump was invoking executive privilege but still refused to answer the questions because Trump could potentially do so or some nonsense? They should give him three choices: 1) Answer the question 2) Say Trump is officially invoking executive privilege and provide official documentation of such 3) Be in contempt of Congress 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DogofWar1 Posted October 18, 2017 Share Posted October 18, 2017 3 hours ago, mistertim said: 1) Answer the question 2) Say Trump is officially invoking executive privilege and provide official documentation of such 3) Be in contempt of Congress The problem, as usual, is that in order to enforce 1 or 2 you need to be willing to do 3, and the present Congress will not do 3. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DogofWar1 Posted October 19, 2017 Share Posted October 19, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted October 19, 2017 Share Posted October 19, 2017 (edited) Edited October 19, 2017 by visionary Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlvinWaltonIsMyBoy Posted October 19, 2017 Share Posted October 19, 2017 I really don't understand the point of a Sessions hearing. He's just saying the same lying garbage he said the first time. The religious liberty stuff was particularly nauseating, it's like a modern day version of witch burning. I did enjoy watching Stuart Smalley give him the business, although I think I'd rather have my tax dollars go to a taco truck that gives out free tacos. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted October 19, 2017 Share Posted October 19, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sacks 'n' Stuff Posted October 19, 2017 Share Posted October 19, 2017 1 minute ago, AlvinWaltonIsMyBoy said: I really don't understand the point of a Sessions hearing.... I think I'd rather have my tax dollars go to a taco truck that gives out free tacos. Agreed. The whole congressional hearing thing is stupid as ****. A tremendous waste of resources that results in nothing more than political grandstanding 2 minutes ago, visionary said: No. Please. Anything but Sweeden. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted October 19, 2017 Share Posted October 19, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Burgold Posted October 19, 2017 Share Posted October 19, 2017 Jeff Sessions: I absolutely did not talk about the elections, campaign, or future policy when I met with the Russian Ambassador who I formerly ever denied meeting with. Congressman: Well, what did you talk about? Jeff Sessions: I can't recall :doh: 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AsburySkinsFan Posted October 19, 2017 Share Posted October 19, 2017 Nothing surprises me with these crooks. The worst part is that Congress is complicit. 2 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted October 19, 2017 Share Posted October 19, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LD0506 Posted October 19, 2017 Share Posted October 19, 2017 6 hours ago, AsburySkinsFan said: The worst part is that Congress is complicit. Which is why they have to carry water for the * and carryon the coverup, the end of the investigation will be implicating sitting members of Congress in active collusion directing the Russian attack on the election. This was/is a de facto coup 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted October 19, 2017 Share Posted October 19, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted October 19, 2017 Share Posted October 19, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted October 19, 2017 Share Posted October 19, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted October 20, 2017 Share Posted October 20, 2017 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Llevron Posted October 20, 2017 Share Posted October 20, 2017 10 minutes ago, visionary said: Seems smart Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now