Llevron Posted October 25, 2017 Share Posted October 25, 2017 (edited) 3 minutes ago, DogofWar1 said: You should watch the new anime they made. *You should absolutely not watch it. They went with cgi. And it's the worst. I have been, and the CGI is terrible, which is why im reading it lol. I was able to fight through the Golden Age Movies (the weed helps) and the ending of the 3rd one was so ridiculous I decided I had to read it. I do not regret my decision. I actually need to see Griffith die now. He has hurt me personally and I cannot accept anything less. Edit: RUSSIANS! (just to stay on topic) Edited October 25, 2017 by Llevron 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted October 25, 2017 Share Posted October 25, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted October 25, 2017 Share Posted October 25, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LadySkinsFan Posted October 25, 2017 Share Posted October 25, 2017 Shouldn't this be treason? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Llevron Posted October 25, 2017 Share Posted October 25, 2017 8 minutes ago, LadySkinsFan said: Shouldn't this be treason? Not sure. Its clear (and has been) that the Russian entity known as Trump tried to get the info. But it doesn't look like they were successful.....yet. Bigger problem is that the DNC did something similar (not the same, though) and if you get one group you are going to have to atleast look at the other. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sacks 'n' Stuff Posted October 25, 2017 Share Posted October 25, 2017 25 minutes ago, LadySkinsFan said: Shouldn't this be treason? Nah. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted October 25, 2017 Share Posted October 25, 2017 This was an attempt at collaboration with a foreign enemy of the US to publicly release information stolen from a US citizen by them. In no way is it similar to what the DNC did, which was normal political bs. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sacks 'n' Stuff Posted October 25, 2017 Share Posted October 25, 2017 But they hit Russia with that strongly worded statement. Had to sting. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LadySkinsFan Posted October 25, 2017 Share Posted October 25, 2017 Words words words, the meaning nothing with this crowd. They're stalling on imposing the sanctions, actual actions that mean something. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
@DCGoldPants Posted October 25, 2017 Share Posted October 25, 2017 Strong thread of facts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted October 25, 2017 Share Posted October 25, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LadySkinsFan Posted October 25, 2017 Share Posted October 25, 2017 He's such a dick. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AsburySkinsFan Posted October 25, 2017 Share Posted October 25, 2017 38 minutes ago, LadySkinsFan said: He's such a dick. And all of his supporters think he’s right. Trump is the epitomy of EVERYTHING wrong with our society. He’s a total scumbag. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larry Posted October 25, 2017 Share Posted October 25, 2017 1 hour ago, visionary said: Yeah. She should have gotten her opposition dirt from the KGB. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sacks 'n' Stuff Posted October 25, 2017 Share Posted October 25, 2017 The only reason the DNC even funded the Steele dossier in the first place was because they were interested in adoptions. 4 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AsburySkinsFan Posted October 25, 2017 Share Posted October 25, 2017 12 minutes ago, Sacks 'n' Stuff said: The only reason the DNC even funded the Steele dossier in the first place was because they were interested in adoptions. Apparently Republicans were interested in those adoptions first. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twa Posted October 25, 2017 Share Posted October 25, 2017 Just now, Sacks 'n' Stuff said: The only reason the DNC even funded the Steele dossier in the first place was because they were interested in adoptions. then why didn't they disclose the payments? https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/oct/25/fec-complaint-accuses-clinton-dnc-violations/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cooked Crack Posted October 26, 2017 Share Posted October 26, 2017 29 minutes ago, twa said: then why didn't they disclose the payments? https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/oct/25/fec-complaint-accuses-clinton-dnc-violations/ I'd like to know how many campaigns designate opposition research as legal services. The article just mentions a watchdog filing a complaint about that action. The FEC has not ruled on it. Again, this news is still hard to care about. If the Dems weren't funding the research after Republicans, who could it be? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twa Posted October 26, 2017 Share Posted October 26, 2017 The Reps did not fund the Steele dossier. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DogofWar1 Posted October 26, 2017 Share Posted October 26, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sacks 'n' Stuff Posted October 26, 2017 Share Posted October 26, 2017 (edited) 1 hour ago, twa said: then why didn't they disclose the payments? https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/oct/25/fec-complaint-accuses-clinton-dnc-violations/ Plum Forgot. I applaud their transparency for admitting to it after they got caught... er reminded i mean. Pat on the back. Edited October 26, 2017 by Sacks 'n' Stuff 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TradeTheBeal! Posted October 26, 2017 Share Posted October 26, 2017 30 minutes ago, twa said: The Reps did not fund the Steele dossier. Nor did they "fund" the invasion of Iraq. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AsburySkinsFan Posted October 26, 2017 Share Posted October 26, 2017 (edited) Duplicate post Edited October 26, 2017 by AsburySkinsFan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larry Posted October 26, 2017 Share Posted October 26, 2017 1 hour ago, twa said: The Reps did not fund the Steele dossier. True. The funding did not come directly from the RNC. A surogate paid for it, for them. I'm certain that that distinction is of huge importance to you. (In the sense of "try to find a difference, any difference, and then pretend that that, rather than party labels, is the reason for your dissimilar reactions to the two events.) 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twa Posted October 26, 2017 Share Posted October 26, 2017 Just now, Larry said: True. The funding did not come directly from the RNC. A surogate paid for it, for them. I'm certain that that distinction is of huge importance to you. (In the sense of "try to find a difference, any difference, and then pretend that that, rather than party labels, is the reason for your dissimilar reactions to the two events.) Steele's work was not contracted until after the 'surrogate' dropped Fusion. I'm sure details don't matter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now