Jumbo Posted January 29, 2020 Share Posted January 29, 2020 2 minutes ago, Destino said: This is the older more boring version of rap albums back in the day getting criticized by public officials. Free publicity. that gave me visions of---tipper gore was it?---wanting to label 'rock' albums back in the day was it tipper? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larry Posted January 29, 2020 Share Posted January 29, 2020 5 minutes ago, Destino said: This is the older more boring version of rap albums back in the day getting criticized by public officials. Free publicity. Can I put "Trump doesn't want you to read this book" on the cover? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EmirOfShmo Posted January 29, 2020 Share Posted January 29, 2020 4 minutes ago, Jumbo said: that gave me visions of---tipper gore was it?---wanting to label 'rock' albums back in the day was it tipper? Yes, she's the one https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parents_Music_Resource_Center Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoCalMike Posted January 29, 2020 Share Posted January 29, 2020 The Republicans are just playing to their radio listener base with the attacks on the media, it plays well to the 30% of the country that eat it up. These people have been conditioned their entire lives that "evil liberal media" is out to get them, so the GOP has gone from soft-validation of that thought, to now just out-right repeating it. When a cretin like Trump is in charge, it rubs off on his minions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cooked Crack Posted January 29, 2020 Share Posted January 29, 2020 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PCS Posted January 29, 2020 Share Posted January 29, 2020 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spjunkies Posted January 29, 2020 Share Posted January 29, 2020 Please release this book, let's see if they have the guts to do anything about it. I seriously doubt it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain Wiggles Posted January 29, 2020 Share Posted January 29, 2020 17 minutes ago, Jumbo said: that gave me visions of---tipper gore was it?---wanting to label 'rock' albums back in the day was it tipper? Frank Zappa saved the day imo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Destino Posted January 29, 2020 Share Posted January 29, 2020 14 minutes ago, Larry said: Can I put "Trump doesn't want you to read this book" on the cover? I’d rather you include a remaster of NWAs greatest hits with each purchase. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Momma There Goes That Man Posted January 29, 2020 Share Posted January 29, 2020 1 hour ago, Jumbo said: will eventually be regarded with even less respect than most people have for nambla (if it still exists) What's wrong with the National Association of Marlon Brando Look Alikes? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
illone Posted January 29, 2020 Share Posted January 29, 2020 Douche-No-Witz drives me crazy. He is literally a gopper errand boy at this point. I wish Harvard would publicly fire him for this nonsense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cooked Crack Posted January 29, 2020 Share Posted January 29, 2020 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spjunkies Posted January 29, 2020 Share Posted January 29, 2020 Is Dershowitz trying to get the guy removed? Wowzers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoCalMike Posted January 29, 2020 Share Posted January 29, 2020 Alan DershoCONWAYwitz: Alternative Quid Pro Quos Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DogofWar1 Posted January 29, 2020 Share Posted January 29, 2020 1 hour ago, Larry said: Can I put "Trump doesn't want you to read this book" on the cover? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PCS Posted January 29, 2020 Share Posted January 29, 2020 Ah. Public interest. Best interest of the country thing. A rabbit hole I'm sure many a politician over the years has fallen in to and am sure many now,(especially the GOP ones),use to rationalize their "modern" behavior. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoCalMike Posted January 29, 2020 Share Posted January 29, 2020 He meant it would create a dangerous attempt at following precedent maybe? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Burgold Posted January 29, 2020 Share Posted January 29, 2020 So, the question I have is this. If Trump has declared that the facts of the Bolton book are false thus declaring it work of fiction how can Trump classify it? By seeking to classify it isn't he stating that there are truths in that book that are vital national interest that must not be shared? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larry Posted January 29, 2020 Share Posted January 29, 2020 27 minutes ago, Cooked Crack said: I think I'd agree with that. If POTUS, for example, negotiates a trade deal that he thinks will be so good for the country, it will guarantee his reelection, there's nothing wrong with that. Of course, trying to apply that to the situation being discussed is simply a variation of the old "The President can negotiate a deal that benefits the country, therefore he can negotiate a deal that benefits him personally" lie. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PCS Posted January 29, 2020 Share Posted January 29, 2020 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LadySkinsFan Posted January 29, 2020 Share Posted January 29, 2020 2 minutes ago, Burgold said: So, the question I have is this. If Trump has declared that the facts of the Bolton book are false thus declaring it work of fiction how can Trump classify it? By seeking to classify it isn't he stating that there are truths in that book that are vital national interest that must not be shared? Good point. Plus, how much of the so-called classified material was classified retroactively? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan T. Posted January 29, 2020 Share Posted January 29, 2020 Jay Sekulow is lying again. Also the sun rose in the east this morning. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larry Posted January 29, 2020 Share Posted January 29, 2020 Think I've got a question for Derschowitz: Sir, I believe you've made the expert legal argument that soliciting a foreign government into providing election assistance is completely legal, because the President believes getting reelected is in the public's interest. Wouldn't that argument assert that, if Donald Trump had chosen to shake down the Ukrainian President into making an anonymous cash contribution to the President's reelection campaign is completely unimpeachable? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoCalMike Posted January 29, 2020 Share Posted January 29, 2020 White House counsel trying to push the "mixed motive" argument as far as personal & public. The flaw in that argument, which I hope the Dems bring up is that if there was a legitimate public interest, then why did Trump not going to his national security team, the FBI, the CIA etc etc.....why instead did he create an off the record team of goons to go shake down the Ukraine gov't? They have never once answered to that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Burgold Posted January 29, 2020 Share Posted January 29, 2020 Eesh. Some of the Republican questions are so bad it's embarrassing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.