Burgold Posted August 19, 2012 Share Posted August 19, 2012 I just don't know what to say about this. It's so stupid and almost feels related to the old rapist excuse "She wanted it" Do people actually believe things like this? http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2012/08/19/gop-senate-nominee-women-dont-get-pregnant-from-legitimate-rapes/ Rep. Todd Akin, the Republican Senate nominee in Missouri, claimed in a TV interview this weekend that women who are ‘legitimate’ victims of rape do not get pregnant because their bodies somehow prevent that from happening. As first reported by TPM, Akin, in an interview with local station KTVI-TV, was defending his staunch anti-abortion stance. When asked if that view applied to extreme instances such as rape—a case some abortion opponents consider an acceptable exception to their otherwise firm opposition—Akin held his ground. “People always try to make that one of those things, ‘Oh, how do you slice this particularly tough sort of ethical question,” Akin said. “It seems to me, first of all, what I understand from doctors is that’s really where—if it’s a legitimate rape, the female body has ways to try to shut that whole thing down.” Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KCClybun Posted August 19, 2012 Share Posted August 19, 2012 Clearly women have Master Chief and his fellow space marines sitting in their vaginas, waiting for some evil rape sperm to try and march through their first line. *rubs temples* I thought people this stupid were only supposed to exist in crappy TV shows! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thiebear Posted August 19, 2012 Share Posted August 19, 2012 Its Stupid like that, should invalidate the votes and have him put out on his ass. Not worthly of 4way stop sign coordination. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larry Posted August 19, 2012 Share Posted August 19, 2012 If the women would just marry their rapists, then they wouldn't be illegitimate pregnancies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
88Comrade2000 Posted August 19, 2012 Share Posted August 19, 2012 Isn't he a tea partier? The Dems should hope for more continued TP success because for every OK TP person the nominate, they then nominate nutjobs. Claire Makaskill should have nothing to worry about now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gibbs Hog Heaven Posted August 19, 2012 Share Posted August 19, 2012 Seriously, if you guys return a Republican to the White House, I fear the laughter from the rest of the World will cause buildings to implode. Hail. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
No Excuses Posted August 19, 2012 Share Posted August 19, 2012 I tried to come up with something snarky and failed. This is beyond stupid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jpyaks3 Posted August 19, 2012 Share Posted August 19, 2012 Isn't he a tea partier?The Dems should hope for more continued TP success because for every OK TP person the nominate, they then nominate nutjobs. Claire Makaskill should have nothing to worry about now. She is/was losing by 11 points up until today, I wouldn't say she has nothing to worry about. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TradeTheBeal! Posted August 19, 2012 Share Posted August 19, 2012 The Republican party is essentially a fringe religious sect at this point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bang Posted August 19, 2012 Share Posted August 19, 2012 So, who agrees that anyone voting for this neanderthal must be sterilized? Honestly.. how is it the worst are what rises these days? ~Bang Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LadySkinsFan Posted August 19, 2012 Share Posted August 19, 2012 And some people think the Republicans' War on Women is all in our pretty little heads. Riiiiiiight! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hersh Posted August 19, 2012 Share Posted August 19, 2012 There is more than a 50% chance this guy becomes a US Senator. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unforgiven Posted August 19, 2012 Share Posted August 19, 2012 I'm not sure if there are any newer studies, but a 1996 study was done by the American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. http://www.ajog.org/article/S0002-9378(96)70141-2/abstract Here are a few quotes : "RESULTS: The national rape-related pregnancy rate is 5.0% per rape among victims of reproductive age (aged 12 to 45); among adult women an estimated 32,101 pregnancies result from rape each year." "CONCLUSIONS: Rape-related pregnancy occurs with significant frequency. It is a cause of many unwanted pregnancies and is closely linked with family and domestic violence." My guess is he's basing his ridiculous opinion on websites like this - http://www.christianliferesources.com/article/rape-pregnancies-are-rare-461 If you look at that website it has a clear agenda and it's very limited citations are from the 1970s. They include classic lines such as ... "How many forcible rapes result in a pregnancy? The numbers claimed have ranged the entire spectrum of possibilities. Some feminists have claimed as high as 5 to 10 percent, which is absurd." "So assault rape pregnancy is extremely rare. If we use the figure of 200, it is 4 per state per year. Even if we use a figure of 500, we're talking about only ten per state, per year" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thebluefood Posted August 19, 2012 Share Posted August 19, 2012 My brain is melting out of my ears from the stupidity. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unforgiven Posted August 20, 2012 Share Posted August 20, 2012 Now he says he 'misspoke' and by misspoke he realized needs votes from people who care about those floozies. It's not an apology, it's more of a "no really....I care, but I was right..." statement. He doesn't acknowledge ever being wrong, he just basically says rape is a bad thing, so yeah....that's a bold statement. http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/story/2012-08-19/todd-akin-rape/57146944/1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KCClybun Posted August 20, 2012 Share Posted August 20, 2012 Now he says he 'misspoke' and by misspoke he realized needs votes from people who care about those floozies.It's not an apology, it's more of a "no really....I care, but I was right..." statement. He doesn't acknowledge ever being wrong, he just basically says rape is a bad thing, so yeah....that's a bold statement. http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/story/2012-08-19/todd-akin-rape/57146944/1 He basically says "I may not have been right about the rape thing, I guess. But you should still have to carry that kid you never wanted because that's an innocent life! And you were sort of innocent, but still. The baby is innocenter." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larry Posted August 20, 2012 Share Posted August 20, 2012 Well, I suppose it's better than the usual "I was quoted out of context. Here, let me see if I can invent a context where it doesn't look as bad". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DCranon21 Posted August 20, 2012 Share Posted August 20, 2012 This is the image I was thinking of when I read this article. I have nothing to say about it, because it just oozed with dumb and stupid. There is no explanation about this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Renegade7 Posted August 20, 2012 Share Posted August 20, 2012 Why is the GOP supporting this guy? is the population of this country really this clueless to the type of people that are being nominated to run for congress now??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thebluefood Posted August 20, 2012 Share Posted August 20, 2012 Why is the GOP supporting this guy? is the population of this country really this clueless to the type of people that are being nominated to run for congress now??? Oh, I think there are plenty of people who realize it. The problem is that the GOP is being hijacked by people who agree with this mindset. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kilmer17 Posted August 20, 2012 Share Posted August 20, 2012 I bet he thinks women should be in chains. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
No_Pressure Posted August 20, 2012 Share Posted August 20, 2012 I think idiots like this guy must come up with **** like this because anatomically for many women it increases their chances of becoming pregnant if they experience orgasm (is this okay to say on a message board? I don't know, but it should be) which is clearly something that is difficult to achieve if you're being raped. The problem is, that only increases the chances and doesn't mean that if you're being raped some sort of magical rape spermicide is going to materialize in the uterus and save the day. If you get raped you could get pregnant just like you could if you weren't being raped. What is so hard to understand about that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AsburySkinsFan Posted August 20, 2012 Share Posted August 20, 2012 Politicians= liars and morons Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zoony Posted August 20, 2012 Share Posted August 20, 2012 Liberal media and their agenda at it again Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AsburySkinsFan Posted August 20, 2012 Share Posted August 20, 2012 He's retracted it. http://www.thedailybeast.com/cheats/2012/08/19/republican-legit-rape-rarely-causes-pregnancy.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.