twa Posted July 10, 2017 Share Posted July 10, 2017 So you are saying using a middleman makes it kosher No Excuses? Yes /No is really not difficult.....we can determine who sought it later. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
No Excuses Posted July 10, 2017 Share Posted July 10, 2017 Just now, twa said: So you are saying using a middleman makes it kosher No Excuses? Ask the FBI. My opinion is meaningless. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Switchgear Posted July 10, 2017 Share Posted July 10, 2017 1 minute ago, twa said: So you are saying using a middleman makes it kosher No Excuses? Yes /No is really not difficult.....we can determine who sought it later. How do you feel about Trump Jr meeting with the Russians, and his changing reasons. You haven't said yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twa Posted July 10, 2017 Share Posted July 10, 2017 Just now, Switchgear said: How do you feel about Trump Jr meeting with the Russians, and his changing reasons. You haven't said yet. I feel nothing, nor do I think it collusion under the law. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StillUnknown Posted July 10, 2017 Share Posted July 10, 2017 4 minutes ago, Switchgear said: How do you feel about Trump Jr meeting with the Russians, and his changing reasons. You haven't said yet. he hasn't been told what to think yet Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Switchgear Posted July 10, 2017 Share Posted July 10, 2017 (edited) 11 minutes ago, twa said: I feel nothing, nor do I think it collusion under the law. You asked if using a middleman makes it kosher. Since you're trying to draw a comparison between the two situations (where none really exists, by the way), it's interesting that you feel it isn't "kosher", yet then say you feel nothing about what Trump Jr did. I'm confused. Edited July 10, 2017 by Switchgear 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedskinsFan44 Posted July 10, 2017 Share Posted July 10, 2017 11 minutes ago, twa said: I feel nothing, nor do I think it collusion under the law. So negotiating policy changes for compromising info w foreign national not collusion? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Llevron Posted July 10, 2017 Share Posted July 10, 2017 So, Trump Jr. says he didnt even know the name of the person he was meeting with. He knew only that this person is connected to him through Russia, is Russian and was claiming to provide information on HRC. Hmmmm. if that doesnt show collusion, it atleast shows the willingness. And collusion isnt really a crime. But it leads to all sorts of fun ones. Treason being in my top 5 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
No Excuses Posted July 10, 2017 Share Posted July 10, 2017 13 minutes ago, RedskinsFan44 said: So negotiating policy changes for compromising info w foreign national not collusion? A foreign national with direct ties to a hostile nation and adversary. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twa Posted July 10, 2017 Share Posted July 10, 2017 23 minutes ago, RedskinsFan44 said: So negotiating policy changes for compromising info w foreign national not collusion? You would need to demonstrate that. From what I read there was no information or negotiation, nor was that the stated purpose. I'm certainly willing to see it if ya got it. 14 minutes ago, No Excuses said: A foreign national with direct ties to a hostile nation and adversary. Are we talking about the Steele dossier or the Trump meeting? You know the source of both is Russian allegedly? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
No Excuses Posted July 10, 2017 Share Posted July 10, 2017 (edited) 6 minutes ago, twa said: Are we talking about the Steele dossier or the Trump meeting? You know the source of both is Russian allegedly? Once again: ask the FBI why the Trump campaign is under investigation but no one related to Chris Steele's work is. Your new deflection isn't as clever as you think it is. Edited July 10, 2017 by No Excuses Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skinsmarydu Posted July 10, 2017 Share Posted July 10, 2017 4 minutes ago, twa said: You know the source of both is Russian allegedly? If that's the case, then the russians have something on Trump, be it pee tape, or money laundering, or collusion in the campaign...which is what Joe alluded to in the first hour this morning. Now, where did I put those goalposts again... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlvinWaltonIsMyBoy Posted July 10, 2017 Share Posted July 10, 2017 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted July 10, 2017 Share Posted July 10, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted July 10, 2017 Share Posted July 10, 2017 (edited) Edited July 10, 2017 by visionary Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
justice98 Posted July 10, 2017 Share Posted July 10, 2017 This whole thing is just proof that Tiffany Trump is the smartest person in that whole family. She gets to enjoy the benefits, but is removed from the shenanigans to not get roped into all this mess. People barely know she exists, while her other siblings are neck deep in hijinks and criticism. 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hersh Posted July 10, 2017 Share Posted July 10, 2017 16 minutes ago, justice98 said: This whole thing is just proof that Tiffany Trump is the smartest person in that whole family. She gets to enjoy the benefits, but is removed from the shenanigans to not get roped into all this mess. People barely know she exists, while her other siblings are neck deep in hijinks and criticism. That's exactly what she wants you to think because she is the true villain behind the scenes pulling all the strings. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LadySkinsFan Posted July 10, 2017 Share Posted July 10, 2017 (edited) Junior better get a lawyer. Everyone else has one. Edited July 10, 2017 by LadySkinsFan 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twa Posted July 10, 2017 Share Posted July 10, 2017 1 hour ago, No Excuses said: Once again: ask the FBI why the Trump campaign is under investigation but no one related to Chris Steele's work is. Your new deflection isn't as clever as you think it is. On the contrary the dossier and those associated with it have, and I assume, are being investigated. It is not a deflection to ask you if acquiring opposition research from the Russians is collusion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
No Excuses Posted July 10, 2017 Share Posted July 10, 2017 Just now, twa said: On the contrary the dossier and those associated with it have, and I assume, are being investigated. We've entered the "make up imaginary investigations to deflect real investigations" territory. 2 minutes ago, twa said: It is not a deflection to ask you if acquiring opposition research from the Russians is collusion. I'll wait for the FBI and DoJ to launch an investigation into who hired Chris Steele. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LadySkinsFan Posted July 10, 2017 Share Posted July 10, 2017 Left unsaid. And if there isn't an investigation, there should be because that's the real issue. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twa Posted July 10, 2017 Share Posted July 10, 2017 1 minute ago, No Excuses said: We've entered the "make up imaginary investigations to deflect real investigations" territory. Are you telling me the FBI used information it did not investigate in a court filing for warrants? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
@DCGoldPants Posted July 10, 2017 Share Posted July 10, 2017 We are beyond the scope of arguing or trying to convince deniers. Do us all a favor. Stop quoting folks who are just baiting you into replying and starting over. This goes for posters on a message board and the Hannity/Hume/Coulter professional victim/senseless attacker crowd. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LD0506 Posted July 10, 2017 Share Posted July 10, 2017 3 minutes ago, @SkinsGoldPants said: We are beyond the scope of arguing or trying to convince deniers. Do us all a favor. Stop quoting folks who are just baiting you into replying and starting over. This goes for posters on a message board and the Hannity/Hume/Coulter professional victim/senseless attacker crowd. A little quiet meditation works wonders...... My mantra these days is "Muellerrrrrrrr..........................Muellerrrrrrr" 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
@DCGoldPants Posted July 10, 2017 Share Posted July 10, 2017 2 minutes ago, LD0506 said: A little quiet meditation works wonders...... My mantra these days is "Muellerrrrrrrr..........................Muellerrrrrrr" Mine is using the ignore function. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now