Jump to content
Washington Football Team Logo
Extremeskins

Trump and his cabinet/buffoonery- Get your bunkers ready!


brandymac27

Recommended Posts

The Ivanka item from the G-20 is totally irrelevant. Is it a sign of dysfunction? Sure. However, the only item that now matters is that Don Jr has admitted to colluding with the Russians. Don't get sidetracked on anything else. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes I am so sure the GOP would go right along with Chelsea sitting in on meetings considering anytime she tweets something she is told to either shut up, or is inundated with "Your Mom Lot" memes, but you know....it'd be cool for her to represent the oval office and all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, DCranon21 said:

Good grief looks like the Prez was on a rant this morning

 

 

 

Curious. He attempts to create in imaginary scenario in which Hillary did what he actually did. (To create a fictional equivelancy, so he can claim a fictional hypocracy). And this is how he describes "Hillary doing the same thing that I actually did". 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Larry said:

 

Curious. He attempts to create in imaginary scenario in which Hillary did what he actually did. (To create a fictional equivelancy, so he can claim a fictional hypocracy). And this is how he describes "Hillary doing the same thing that I actually did". 

 

Trump has been on a "Stories of Fiction & Deflection" Tour for the last two years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, twa said:

 

Accusations are easy, get back to me when Mueller fact checks

 

Trump Jr has hired a lawyer. According to his daddy, "you don't hire a lawyer unless you did something wrong."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why is it that every time Trump does something........."unconventional" (the kindest way to put it?) his reaction to criticism is to make up a scenario about Hillary Clinton doing it?  Does he get that she isn't nor has ever been the President?  It doesn't matter what Hillary would or wouldn't do.  If he is going to go to the "but if......."insert person here" did it" card, why not at least search for examples of actual past Presidents doing the same thing.

 

I suppose it's much easier to justify your actions when you are comparing them to a make believe President from Never-Never Happened Land?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, NoCalMike said:

Why is it that every time Trump does something........."unconventional" (the kindest way to put it?) his reaction to criticism is to make up a scenario about Hillary Clinton doing it?  Does he get that she isn't nor has ever been the President?  It doesn't matter what Hillary would or wouldn't do.  If he is going to go to the "but if......."insert person here" did it" card, why not at least search for examples of actual past Presidents doing the same thing.

 

I suppose it's much easier to justify your actions when you are comparing them to a make believe President from Never-Never Happened Land?

But Trump lives in his own fantasyland. It would take intellect and a desire to learn and discover to engage with facts and precidence...he has time only for Faux News. And they haven't told him what to think yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Quote

WASHINGTON — President Trump’s advisers recruited two businessmen who profited from military contracting to devise alternatives to the Pentagon’s plan to send thousands of additional troops to Afghanistan, reflecting the Trump administration’s struggle to define its strategy for dealing with a war now 16 years old.

 

Erik D. Prince, a founder of the private security firm Blackwater Worldwide, and Stephen A. Feinberg, a billionaire financier who owns the giant military contractor DynCorp International, have developed proposals to rely on contractors instead of American troops in Afghanistan at the behest of Stephen K. Bannon, Mr. Trump’s chief strategist, and Jared Kushner, his senior adviser and son-in-law, according to people briefed on the conversations.

 

On Saturday morning, Mr. Bannon sought out Defense Secretary Jim Mattis at the Pentagon to try to get a hearing for their ideas, an American official said. Mr. Mattis listened politely but declined to include the outside strategies in a review of Afghanistan policy that he is leading along with the national security adviser, Lt. Gen. H. R. McMaster.

 

The highly unusual meeting dramatizes the divide between Mr. Trump’s generals and his political staff over Afghanistan, the lengths to which his aides will go to give their boss more options for dealing with it and the readiness of this White House to turn to business people for help with diplomatic and military problems.

 

Quote

Mr. Feinberg, whose name had previously been floated to conduct a review of the nation’s intelligence agencies, met with the president on Afghanistan, according to an official, while Mr. Prince briefed several White House officials, including General McMaster, said a second person.

 

Mr. Prince laid out his views in an op-ed in The Wall Street Journal in May. He called on the White House to appoint a viceroy to oversee the country and to use “private military units” to fill the gaps left by departed American soldiers.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...