Riggo-toni Posted May 6, 2011 Share Posted May 6, 2011 Libertarian, although I found myself not liking most of the either/or choices. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
youngestson Posted May 6, 2011 Share Posted May 6, 2011 Post Modern Along with 13% of the population. Which explains why I so rarely agree with much of anyone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fullnelson9999 Posted May 6, 2011 Share Posted May 6, 2011 Post modern for me, though I really disagree with the "conservative" on race bit. I think they were just being lazy when they made up the test. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RansomthePasserby Posted May 6, 2011 Share Posted May 6, 2011 Post Modern Along with 13% of the population. Which explains why I so rarely agree with much of anyone. Seems like 13% is actually one of the larger chunks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heisenberg Posted May 6, 2011 Share Posted May 6, 2011 "Post Modern" I thought the test sucked though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
youngestson Posted May 6, 2011 Share Posted May 6, 2011 Seems like 13% is actually one of the larger chunks. Yes it does. I went back and looked at it and saw just how many slots there were. If this is even somewhat accurate shouldn't we have a hell of lot more than two major parties? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heisenberg Posted May 6, 2011 Share Posted May 6, 2011 Yes it does. I went back and looked at it and saw just how many slots there were. If this is even somewhat accurate shouldn't we have a hell of lot more than two major parties? Maybe we should start the "Post Modern Party"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Predicto Posted May 6, 2011 Share Posted May 6, 2011 Maybe we should start the "Post Modern Party"? Yeah, you racists would love to have your own party, wouldn't you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
youngestson Posted May 6, 2011 Share Posted May 6, 2011 Maybe we should start the "Post Modern Party"? What would be a good motto? "We make sense in our own minds"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AsburySkinsFan Posted May 6, 2011 Share Posted May 6, 2011 If this is even somewhat accurate shouldn't we have a hell of lot more than two major parties? Yes...yes...yes...yes...yes...yes...yes...but knowing that there are so many different categories that we fall into definitely does explain why the candidates start with their bases and then gravitate toward the center. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heisenberg Posted May 6, 2011 Share Posted May 6, 2011 Yeah, you racists would love to have your own party, wouldn't you? Yeah, in fact maybe that could be our motto. "We love the gays, unless they're black." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AsburySkinsFan Posted May 6, 2011 Share Posted May 6, 2011 What would be a good motto? "We make sense in our own minds"? Thtat's about right, but the only problem is that most of the times they can't even agree with each other about who's mind its supposed to make sense in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
youngestson Posted May 6, 2011 Share Posted May 6, 2011 Thtat's about right, but the only problem is that most of the times they can't even agree with each other about who's mind its supposed to make sense in. Well I guess it's a matter of trust. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Madison Redskin Posted May 6, 2011 Share Posted May 6, 2011 Post modern. Go figure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twa Posted May 6, 2011 Share Posted May 6, 2011 Libertarian, although I found myself not liking most of the either/or choices. Isn't that the way it is for Libertarians today? Either vote for principles or settle for a candidate ya don't like Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PokerPacker Posted May 6, 2011 Share Posted May 6, 2011 Isn't that the way it is for Libertarians today?Either vote for principles or settle for a candidate ya don't like haha, pretty much. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Springfield Posted May 6, 2011 Share Posted May 6, 2011 Libertarian... meh. I feel like I'm more liberal than that. Any time I hear a libertarian talking head on radio or TV, they always sound like nut jobs. Although, it seems like most of the Libertarians didn't like the options in most of the questions. Maybe I do fall in line. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
China Posted May 6, 2011 Share Posted May 6, 2011 Post-modern along with 13% of the public. I will say that for this one both are true: Government is almost always wasteful and inefficient. Government often does a better job than people give it credit for. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Homercles82 Posted May 6, 2011 Share Posted May 6, 2011 I dislike how there was no in between on some of the questions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DCsportsfan53 Posted May 6, 2011 Share Posted May 6, 2011 What are worthless poll. There wasn't a single question where I really liked either answer. Anyways, apparently I'm a "post modern" political type. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boss_Hogg Posted May 6, 2011 Share Posted May 6, 2011 Post-Modern Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KDawg Posted May 6, 2011 Share Posted May 6, 2011 I'm a "Post Modern" It says: -Generally supportive of government, though more conservative on race policies and the safety net - Not sure this is true. I think everyone puts too much stock in race and should let intelligence/actions determine your opinion of the individual, rather than the color of their skin. So I guess things like affirmative action make no sense to me, so I guess you could say I'm conservative there. -Strongly supportive of regulation and environmental protection -I'm not strongly supportive of regulation and environmental protection. I think the environment is important, but I think we sometimes go a bit too far with it. -Most (56%) say Wall Street helps the economy more than it hurts -I know very little about Wall Street, so I have no idea -Very liberal on social issues, including same-sex marriage - VERY liberal? No. I think we should be accepting of same-sex couples as a society, but that doesn't mean I think its right. I don't. But who am I to judge others on what they're doing? It's their life. They can live it how they choose, and I'm not going to hate you for what you do in your personal life. -One of the least religious groups: nearly a third are unaffiliated with any religious tradition - This is accurate. I believe in God/a higher power. I don't necessarily believe in religion. -Favor the use of diplomacy rather than force - I'm not sure how this fits me in the least. I think diplomacy is important... but, my answers to the questions were: "The best way to ensure peace is through Military Strength", "Using overwhelming military force is the best way to defeat terrorism around the world". Not sure how this indicates I'm for diplomacy RATHER than force. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NavyDave Posted May 6, 2011 Share Posted May 6, 2011 Yeah, the economy tanks. That is correct LSF, Democrats, Republicans and Independents who embraced the liberal progressive way are at fault for the economy tanking just as much as the corrupt types on Wall Street. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zoony Posted May 6, 2011 Share Posted May 6, 2011 I'm a New Coalition Democrat, whatever the hell that is. Me and 10% of the rest of the country. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LadySkinsFan Posted May 6, 2011 Share Posted May 6, 2011 Unity is powerful, LSF, its really nice to see you and Dave on the same page. Laying the S&L crisis at the feet of liberal progressives is a generous concession on your part. Wow, I thought the S&L debacle happened on Reagan and Bush administrations' watch after deregulation of the real estate industry. Funny, I didn't know that Reagan and GHWBush were liberal progressives! What a history rewrite! And it worked so well in the 80s and 90s that they did it again in 2007-2008! Again, under another liberal progressive Bush! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.