visionary Posted July 4, 2017 Share Posted July 4, 2017 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kosher Ham Posted July 6, 2017 Share Posted July 6, 2017 On 6/29/2017 at 9:44 PM, twa said: I'd hit it. Umm...are you certain that is not a ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
s0crates Posted July 13, 2017 Share Posted July 13, 2017 (edited) On June 29, 2017 at 2:29 PM, TryTheBeal! said: The NRA is a Death Cult. <viral NRA ad video> Just saw this video, and I must say it is scary stuff. Worse than the lunatics on the left who want to burn the racist patriarchy to the ground are the compensatory forces they've summoned on the right who are stocking up on ammo to use against them. Now might be a good time for the ideologically possessed folks on both sides to stop regarding half the country as the enemy. Edited July 13, 2017 by s0crates Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted July 25, 2017 Share Posted July 25, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheGreatBuzz Posted July 25, 2017 Share Posted July 25, 2017 Im interested to see how this will affect other states gun laws..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popeman38 Posted July 25, 2017 Share Posted July 25, 2017 The ruling if anyone wants to read https://www.cadc.uscourts.gov/internet/opinions.nsf/005426559985AEE685258168004F376E/$file/16-7025-1685640.pdf WaPost summary https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/public-safety/appeals-court-blocks-enforcement-of-districts-strict-concealed-carry-law/2017/07/25/29bcbdfc-7146-11e7-9eac-d56bd5568db8_story.html?utm_term=.1e8f03b551a5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tshile Posted July 25, 2017 Share Posted July 25, 2017 Quote “The good-reason law is necessarily a total ban on most D.C. residents’ right to carry a gun in the face of ordinary self-defense needs,” wrote Judge Thomas B. Griffith, who was joined by Judge Stephen F. Williams. ... Residents who want a permit to carry a concealed firearm in D.C. must now show that they have “good reason to fear injury” or a “proper reason,” such as transporting valuables. ... Maryland operates the same way. I'm cool with restrictions, but not that restrictive. I'd prefer training/proficiency tests and legal understanding tests, not ones about whether you transfer valuables or not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kosher Ham Posted July 25, 2017 Share Posted July 25, 2017 Seems that beyond a type of firearm...there is a slight chance to agree. Now that, that part is over. Full circle. I feel that it is within my rights to protect myself and my family. I do not think anyone disagrees with that. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted August 2, 2017 Share Posted August 2, 2017 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LadySkinsFan Posted August 2, 2017 Share Posted August 2, 2017 (edited) I have my gun in my home, and I carry when I travel, especially at rest stops when I walk Dancer. And now especially as my left side is weakened by the stroke in that I can't run. You bet I am armed. I now present as prey and attractive to predators. Except I can defend myself. Edited August 2, 2017 by LadySkinsFan 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheGreatBuzz Posted August 2, 2017 Share Posted August 2, 2017 17 minutes ago, visionary said: Good. No matter your view on guns, no one can argue that this cou try doesnt need some clarity on what the 2nd means. And because of my personal views, Im not exactly sad the current court makeup would hear it. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chew Posted August 2, 2017 Share Posted August 2, 2017 (edited) 26 minutes ago, visionary said: hail yeah! 21 minutes ago, LadySkinsFan said: You bet I am armed. Damn right! Tell 'em, LSF! Edited August 2, 2017 by Chew 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted August 4, 2017 Share Posted August 4, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedskinsFan44 Posted August 5, 2017 Share Posted August 5, 2017 (edited) Gottal love the headline: https://news.vice.com/story/nra-spokeswoman-denies-threatening-to-fist-the-new-york-times Add: I did hear "fisk" but had to look it up. Plus "deep rich"? WTF is up with the NRA? No mention of guns in this diatribe. Edited August 5, 2017 by RedskinsFan44 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sacks 'n' Stuff Posted August 5, 2017 Share Posted August 5, 2017 Dude, that NRA video, and some of the others they've been putting out lately, are ****ing terrifying. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedskinsFan44 Posted August 5, 2017 Share Posted August 5, 2017 (edited) She seems much more friendly when she is shilling SuperBeets. Maybe the beets made her fn crazy. Edited August 5, 2017 by RedskinsFan44 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JSSkinz Posted August 15, 2017 Share Posted August 15, 2017 I don't understand how the people in this picture can walk around the streets of Charlotte with assault rifles, who thought that was a good idea? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LadySkinsFan Posted August 15, 2017 Share Posted August 15, 2017 See, this is what I mean that municipalities issuing assembly/parade permits can suspend open carry and concealed carry from participants. These mopes openly carrying assault rifles are for pure intimidation. Small dicked men. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheGreatBuzz Posted August 15, 2017 Share Posted August 15, 2017 2 hours ago, jschuck12001 said: I don't understand how the people in this picture can walk around the streets of Charlotte with assault rifles, who thought that was a good idea? Impressive that not a single shot was fired in that mess. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheGreatBuzz Posted October 2, 2017 Share Posted October 2, 2017 Im bumping this to helpt people find it if needed. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
justice98 Posted October 2, 2017 Share Posted October 2, 2017 I guess this Vegas situation wouldnt be one where the "if only people had been armed, it coulda been stopped" argument would apply. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheGreatBuzz Posted October 2, 2017 Share Posted October 2, 2017 4 minutes ago, justice98 said: I guess this Vegas situation wouldnt be one where the "if only people had been armed, it coulda been stopped" argument would apply. I would say not. No way anyone else could have done anythimg to stop him short of an extremely skilled sniper with a very nice rifle. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted October 2, 2017 Share Posted October 2, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fergasun Posted October 2, 2017 Share Posted October 2, 2017 I know that with more stringent gun control these types of incidents (Las Vegas) will not go away.... but dammit we need more regulation to make them harder... I was here after Newton. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bang Posted October 2, 2017 Share Posted October 2, 2017 A silencer is a murder tool only. Any other reason given is just someone trying to justify a tool that's sole purpose is to facilitate murder. Not defense. Murder. ~Bang 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts