Jump to content
Washington Football Team Logo
Extremeskins

Moose & Squirrel v Boris & Natasha: what's the deal with the rooskies and trumpland?


Jumbo

Recommended Posts

18 minutes ago, Momma There Goes That Man said:

He is pathetic. Standing strong in the face of the entire world basically telling him he is full of **** on this 

 

Ain't the first time, he has pretty much made a career out of it

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Sleepy eye" says the facelifted spray tan from beneath his colossal comb-over.

i mean really. it's pathetic. A 3rd grader has better self awareness.

But the level of discourse is about the same.

(and this ignores the hoodwinky hey lookie over here and not at my ass on fire misdirection the post is trying to be.)

 

if you support this guy,,,  how? 

HOW?

 

 

 

~Bang

Edited by Bang
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Has anyone responded to Trump "Well, yes... you are a suspect in a treason plot after all"

 

 

Seriously though, remember how the WH has the ability to get to the bottom of the whole surveillance thing, and then Trump said there would be something coming out on it soon?  Well, out came Nunes and we find out that the WH essentially has nothing (except incidental collection).

 

Tempted to to sign on the twitter just so I can retweet his crap with #FakePresident

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

And I'm really admiring the incredible (well, incredible to anybody with a functioning brain) spin on this "incidental collection".  

 

Near as I can tell, the exchange can be paraphrased as:

 

"Obama wiretapped me!"

"No, he didn't"

(Produces some reports that say that the government did wiretap some Russian spies.  And some of Trump's people are on tape, contacting the Russian spies.)  

"See?  This proves I was right!"  

 

Near as I can tell, the Trump White House is literally waving around proof that Trump officials were contacting Russian agents,  and trying to yell real loudly that this somehow proves that they are victims.  

 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Larry said:

And I'm really admiring the incredible (well, incredible to anybody with a functioning brain) spin on this "incidental collection".  

 

Near as I can tell, the exchange can be paraphrased as:

 

"Obama wiretapped me!"

"No, he didn't"

(Produces some reports that say that the government did wiretap some Russian spies.  And some of Trump's people are on tape, contacting the Russian spies.)  

"See?  This proves I was right!"  

 

Near as I can tell, the Trump White House is literally waving around proof that Trump officials were contacting Russian agents,  and trying to yell real loudly that this somehow proves that they are victims.  

 

At this point I don't know what the hell is going on, and sadly I don't trust the GOP lackeys to conduct a REAL investigation or even to disclose the truth from ANY investigation. Anyone who does trust them is a fool. The GOP has shredded their integrity and credibility for political expediency. Worst part is that their voters are applauding their efforts. 

 

*queue @twa with his false equivalency. Where he attempts to smear the Dems in an effort to prevent him from gagging on his own words.*

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, AsburySkinsFan said:

At this point I don't know what the hell is going on, . . . 

 

But isn't that what "incidental collection" is?  

 

"We had a wiretap on the phone of this suspected spy.  And the wiretap recorded a conversation between your guy and the spy."?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, twa said:

pointing out the obvious is smearing?

 

OK 

Right on queue.

And if you were pointing out facts independent of your efforts to distract attention from Trump then fine, but you NEVER pipe up in criticism of Trump you only ever offer criticism of Dems in order to distract from the attention your useful liar.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, AsburySkinsFan said:

The real question is would you be criticizing him if we didn't?

Do you feel that these criticisms are legitimate? 

No clever distractions just basic answers.

 

I have to assume here that you simply had a brain fart and forgot who you were talking to.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, mistertim said:

 

I have to assume here that you simply had a brain fart and forgot who you were talking to.

Oh I know full well, I just enjoy putting him in a position where he has to admit that he's a hack that isn't interested in truth, honesty, our justice. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

13 minutes ago, AsburySkinsFan said:

Oh I know full well, I just enjoy putting him in a position where he has to admit that he's a hack that isn't interested in truth, honesty, our justice. 

 

Admit it?  

 

I have to to assume here that you simply had a brain fart and forgot who you were talking to. 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

32 minutes ago, AsburySkinsFan said:

He may never actually put it in writing or even speak the words, but he still has to admit it, if only to himself.

 

Bro, twa don't give a ****. He's no dummy.   Its a conscious decision.

 

Sometimes I wonder if he isn't on to something. It might be blissful ?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...