visionary Posted June 20, 2017 Share Posted June 20, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted June 20, 2017 Share Posted June 20, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AsburySkinsFan Posted June 20, 2017 Share Posted June 20, 2017 Looks like 36% is the number of diehard supporters. I hope it falls farther, but it'll take a lot more than whoring around with Russians and obstruction of justice to convince the "Law & Order" voters to abandon their sherbet troll. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redskinss Posted June 20, 2017 Share Posted June 20, 2017 Is pew an unbiased non partisan source? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Corcaigh Posted June 20, 2017 Share Posted June 20, 2017 6 minutes ago, redskinss said: Is pew an unbiased non partisan source? Yes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sacks 'n' Stuff Posted June 20, 2017 Share Posted June 20, 2017 19 minutes ago, AsburySkinsFan said: Looks like 36% is the number of diehard supporters. I hope it falls farther, but it'll take a lot more than whoring around with Russians and obstruction of justice to convince the "Law & Order" voters to abandon their sherbet troll. I'm not sure that anything could. I mean, if he kissed a dude or turned black, sure but I'm talking things that would be just as crazy and might actually happen. The Muslim ban, making up **** about voter fraud, the attack on the press, throwing our intelligence organizations under the bus for Russia, lying about Obama wiretapping, firing Comey... this should all be impeachable. Seriously, every one of those things could be in the history books. People just fall over themselves to defend him though. 7 minutes ago, redskinss said: Is pew an unbiased non partisan source? It only said steady. Not good. Mr Burns (going over his stock portfolio): "Hmmm... Confederated Slave Holdings. How's that doing?" Smithers: "It's um... Steady." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DogofWar1 Posted June 20, 2017 Share Posted June 20, 2017 26 minutes ago, AsburySkinsFan said: Looks like 36% is the number of diehard supporters. I hope it falls farther, but it'll take a lot more than whoring around with Russians and obstruction of justice to convince the "Law & Order" voters to abandon their sherbet troll. I think we're at the "policy" floor, that is, in the absence of a crisis in which he fails or further criminal stuff, he won't drop much more. I think there are some points still to lose if things like healthcare fail miserably, but for the most part something major is going to need to happen to drag him below 35%. That being said, his sub-40 aggregate approval has been quite enduring. He's likely not going to get above 42 or so approval any time soon without some major positive activity. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted June 20, 2017 Share Posted June 20, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Corcaigh Posted June 20, 2017 Share Posted June 20, 2017 14 minutes ago, visionary said: Heavy industrial machinery and judgement-impaired workers sounds like a winning combination. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DogofWar1 Posted June 20, 2017 Share Posted June 20, 2017 Liquoring up high school students isn't the solution. The right solution...take it away Patrick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
justice98 Posted June 20, 2017 Share Posted June 20, 2017 54 minutes ago, redskinss said: Is pew an unbiased non partisan source? There's no such thing. 34 minutes ago, visionary said: He seems to not have discussed a lot with the President. He says that at least once a press conference. And it's never about an obscure topic where never discussing it would be plausible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoCalMike Posted June 20, 2017 Share Posted June 20, 2017 1 hour ago, AsburySkinsFan said: Looks like 36% is the number of diehard supporters. I hope it falls farther, but it'll take a lot more than whoring around with Russians and obstruction of justice to convince the "Law & Order" voters to abandon their sherbet troll. When Bush left office wasn't there about 28-32% polling that he did a good job and were satisfied with his performance? I would imagine that is about a realistic target % that it will never drop under. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larry Posted June 20, 2017 Share Posted June 20, 2017 8 minutes ago, justice98 said: He seems to not have discussed a lot with the President. He says that at least once a press conference. And it's never about an obscure topic where never discussing it would be plausible. I don't have that much trouble believing that, with this President, there are numerous subjects that you don't want to discuss with him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Llevron Posted June 20, 2017 Share Posted June 20, 2017 17 minutes ago, justice98 said: There's no such thing. He seems to not have discussed a lot with the President. He says that at least once a press conference. And it's never about an obscure topic where never discussing it would be plausible. Ima be honest with you. If....by some chance in a horrible eternal paper cut hell, I had Spicers job. One thing I would be ****ing sure not to talk to Donald Trump about is the Russia Investigation lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
justice98 Posted June 20, 2017 Share Posted June 20, 2017 18 minutes ago, NoCalMike said: When Bush left office wasn't there about 28-32% polling that he did a good job and were satisfied with his performance? I would imagine that is about a realistic target % that it will never drop under. Trump has set the bar so low for FUBAR presidencies, you gotta be pretty terrible and unlikeable to even get close to him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sacks 'n' Stuff Posted June 20, 2017 Share Posted June 20, 2017 26 minutes ago, justice98 said: He seems to not have discussed a lot with the President. He says that at least once a press conference. And it's never about an obscure topic where never discussing it would be plausible. Or he says "The President has been quite clear" when nobody knows what his position is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
@DCGoldPants Posted June 20, 2017 Share Posted June 20, 2017 1 minute ago, Sacks 'n' Stuff said: Or he says "The President has been quite clear" when nobody knows what his position is. That kills me. He says it all the time. It's a trap. If they reply with "he isn't being clear" the response is "the American People understand what he's saying.....". and the cycle continues. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Llevron Posted June 20, 2017 Share Posted June 20, 2017 5 minutes ago, @SkinsGoldPants said: That kills me. He says it all the time. It's a trap. If they reply with "he isn't being clear" the response is "the American People understand what he's saying.....". and the cycle continues. When he does this I know I could never be a reporter cause I know I would just be in the back like "No he hasnt...." "No we dont..." really loud lol I wish they would have these at a local bar. As a mater of fact, when Im president, I will have my press conferences at a bar. Vote me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AsburySkinsFan Posted June 20, 2017 Share Posted June 20, 2017 1 hour ago, DogofWar1 said: Liquoring up high school students isn't the solution. The right solution...take it away Patrick. Patrick Star is absolutely right!!! I saw a recent housing report that said that worker mobility is extremely low right now, like half of what it was 10-20 years ago. There are jobs that need workers but workers are simply not willing to relocate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tshile Posted June 20, 2017 Share Posted June 20, 2017 2 hours ago, redskinss said: Is pew an unbiased non partisan source? my understanding has always been: they are about as close as it gets, but no one is (nor can be) perfect Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sacks 'n' Stuff Posted June 20, 2017 Share Posted June 20, 2017 Who wins in a fight? ***PATRICK STAR*** VS ***DAUBER FROM COACH*** Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TradeTheBeal! Posted June 20, 2017 Share Posted June 20, 2017 2 hours ago, Corcaigh said: Heavy industrial machinery and judgement-impaired workers sounds like a winning combination. The Russian Way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted June 20, 2017 Share Posted June 20, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted June 20, 2017 Share Posted June 20, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FanboyOf91 Posted June 21, 2017 Share Posted June 21, 2017 Cucked! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.