redskinss

I'm guessing the article is about the lasting effect of trump and not actually about trumps longevity. The yard signs are most likely intended to be metaphorical and reference the fact that the candidates on the Republican ticket in those years could very well reflect a lot of trumps values, or lack thereof.

That sounds like instructions you'd give a 6 year old if a van pulled up labeled "candy inside". Come to think of it, its definitely something you'd tell a woman who was alone with trump. If he tries to grab you by the **** just yell trump trump trump while holding your me too sign and security will come and get him.

Yeah I kinda figured you must have seen him practicing, plus it would be a little mean for him to actually agree to the photo otherwise. I dont recognize him though.

Could be a janitor. That's what happened to my wife, she got so caught up asking for autographs she asked one guy and he said sure but I'm just the janitor. In her defense this was the biggest janitor I've ever seen in my life. We had a good laugh after though and I like to remind her about it from time to time.

Could you elaborate? I cant imagine you think that starting flowers is going to sell tickets.

There are lots of things I don't like about Gruden but his ability to get the most out of a quarterbacks skills, at least for me isn't one of them. Dalton in cinci, cousins here and then even after the debacle here last year what Johnson was doing, I thought was incredibly impressive. To bring a guy in off the street mid season who's totally green to your system and have it even function at all much less show periods off success, I think most of that was on Gruden. Just my opinion and I could be way off but I've always thought Gruden was excellent with quarterbacks and I wonder what he could do with a true blue chipper.

Anything is possible but 2-14 is highly unlikely and even he knows that. They do these things for ratings and they gotta throw some teams under the bus with their guesses otherwise the whole thing would be even more dull and pointless than it already is.. I'll bet if you put a gun to his head and asked him to set the over under on skins wins this year with the threat of pulling the trigger if he was off by more than two games, you'd see him singing a whole new tune about how he thinks our season will play out.

You are an arrogant one aren't ya. I wanted to drop it but since you want to make it personal we can throw down. You swore up and down that the article wasn't about last year but it very clearly was, as it referred to 2019 rankings and mentioned that scherff missed half the season but at this point that's neither here nor there. You really think your **** dont stink but I know the truth, you have so little confidence in yourself that you need to insult other people with your ridiculous memes, gifs and Dennis miller wannabe quips non stop to make yourself feel intelligent. If that's what you need to make yourself feel good then I truly feel sorry for you.

There, there now, get it all out. You feel better? Good, now move on.

I dont think it makes you ineligible so much as it makes it so they can't force you to do it but since it certainly appears that the Redskins aren't going to volunteer it is basically the same thing.

It sure came off that way in your post. By only mentioning that they ranked us 24th and adding that it also included trent which wasn't specifically brought up in the article it sounded like you were referencing that their opinion of our line was worse than it is. But whatever I'm not gonna get into an argument with you, your post certainly came off that way to me.

Having hit on the injury bug that clearly had a large part in Washington’s below average 2018, I believe looking forward that the pure talent they have from their big men can translate into a top-15 or top-10 unit. You pretty conveniently seemed to leave this part of the article out of your summation. This ranking is based off of last years unit that was decimated by injuries.

The first part of your statement is what I'm referring to, the fact that because we already have one huge contract weighing us down we can't take a risk on another. Now if it was a player who was 25 with no history of injuries like say Landon Collins then maybe you gamble, all teams have to do that, yes I agree, but with Williams already peaked and heading towards the pasture it's a much larger risk. As to the second part of your statement I have no idea where that came from because I certainly didn't mean to suggest Trent would care about Smith's contract because he wouldn't and shouldn't.

You also have to take the Alex Smith situation into consideration with regards to trent. If we hadn't signed Smith we could afford to gamble and give a guy with a history of ailments a contract with significant guarantees, but since we already have so much dead money on Alex Smith how devastating would it be to have 40 or 50 million wrapped up in a tackle that cant play either. If trent were to suffer a career ending injury we'd truly be screwed beyond repair and would almost be forced into a total rebuild which could very well waste the prime and cheap years of our young and talented defensive core. This situation totally sucks but any of the historically smart teams in our situation would stick to their guns and force him to play out his contract.

That's true and something that should be done at the bargaining table not on an individual basis. Its one of the reasons players are trying to tie contracts to the cap. I don't get upset if a player without a contract tries to get more than he's worth that's something they should all try and I wont be pissed at the players if there's a work stoppage because that's what they need to do to fix these problems but I dont usually empathize with a players current contract because they knew (or at least should have) what they were signing.. Rookie contracts are a different story for me, they got screwed so bad in the new CBA that I do feel bad for some of those guys at times when they grossly outplay their contracts.