redskinss

I agree that was definitely inappropriate. But we also dont know the whole story. It sounds to me like his neighbors hate him and want him gone or his dogs gone. We don't know how much animosity has been there, we dont know how their relationship has effected their actions. He may have just been angry at how he was being vilified and lashed out. I just hate rushing to judgment on these things when I know absolutely nothing of the situation.

Awful lot of early convictions in the court of public opinion. We've gotten so quick to judge nowadays that I'm gonna get shredded just for pointing it out.

On a similar but slightly off topic note, my wife just tried to sell tickets to a concert on Craigslist (yes I know scam superstore) and got scammed and now she's trying to deal with the repercussions. She was told she needed to be verified as a real person through Google voice and was really busy and fell for it. It's almost impossible nowadays to interact anywhere on the internet and feel safe. I've had transactions that were almost certainly legit totally fall through because I'm super paranoid about everything online now. Sucks!

I wouldn't hate going with mike McCarthy. If nothing else he's excellent with quarterbacks and if he decided haskins had enough to work with he would certainly be the guy to get the most out of his talents. He had some great years in green bay and maybe he's not the next rising superstar but he might be enough to right the ship before we try to set sail.

How is it that we haven't gotten an update on guice's MRI yet?

So entertaining the thought of alex smith as gm, what would that do to our salary cap? Obviously he'd have to retire to take a position as g.m. Would that eliminate his cap charge? Would there be any questions as to the manor in which we were able to shed so much cap charge and still pay smith a huge sum of money in the process? I'm curious if anyone knows because I dont think it's ever happened.

I'm not a star wars geek so forgive my naivety but I was reading earlier in this thread that the events of the mandalorian take place after return of the jedi. If that's the case then how could it possibly be the person that people are speculating it was at the end of the episode? Didn't that person die in return of the jedi? Ps, sorry if I'm creating an obvious spoiler but I don't know how to do the "hide contents" thing.

I was thinking the exact same thing. It'd be like the owner of the white star line hiring a submersible to visit the wreck of the titanic and losing his mind when the operator bumped the ship and put a hole in it. At this point shouldn't he have at least been emotionally prepared that we we would most likely lose and that a 5 point loss on the road to a 9 and 3 team is actually pretty good? I want bruce gone and changes made as much as the next guy but again if the owner is this wildly irrational it won't make any difference.

So what happened with guice? I wasn't watching but heard them say he's out.

At least we get to fire,

Is there a person on the planet that doesn't think the packers will get a touchdown here?

I know, I'm like, what the hell is going on. He just called himself out and then told himself to enjoy his own ignorance.

https://www.newyorker.com/humor/borowitz-report/scientists-earth-endangered-by-new-strain-of-fact-resistant-humans?fbclid=IwAR2PTFxFBC8sQhz2E5rFDMfwb5nFCDX2gM0VZKn18Gclcatcu23ScFhSG-w Not sure what thread this belongs in but it works pretty good here. I just looked and didn't realize it was that old, from 2015.

It is definitely a seperate problem but obviously linked. It's also one of the reasons it's hard to compromise because if you asked Republicans the overwhelming majority support social assistance for people who need it but I think there desire to not allow free loaders outweighs their desire to help those that need it. It's a shame because I think most people agree on most of the subject but politics always gets in the way

Since they've already decided you cant indict a sitting president, anything from getting a bj in the oval office to mass genocide is impeachable conduct, so it really all depends on your definition of impeachable conduct. If ya think about it.