The Impeachment Thread

[TradeTheBeal!]

Just now, CousinsCowgirl84 said:

 

12 years in office, one term. That’s what we need. 

 

Havent seen a Trump Job Approval post from you recently.

 

Hows he doing these days?

[Llevron]

15 minutes ago, CousinsCowgirl84 said:

 

12 years in office, one term. That’s what we need. 

 

I dont follow -- my bad 

[Jumbo]

Humans are humans (unintelligent design), thus any demographic we discuss gets to suffer that commonality.

 

And as I usually note these days when I am posting, "the left" is full of enough issues from silly to serious that they alone present a full time never-ending job to wrangle into a productive herd.

 

But, as you regs know per my take, the right wing is so much more diseased and ugly and crazy, overall,  that there is no contest. 

 

It's quite the tribute to the range of human cognition that even now there are those who feel trump and the current trump-ruled gop is something to argue for and defend . I have zero respect for that kind of "prioritizing", personally. I find it severely lacking of a decent ethical and moral base that's consistent in application, and in terms of logical rationale to support it,  and in awareness/internalization of facts extant in these matters (requires the ability to discern fact from belief/bias/bs propaganda).

 

Anyone choosing to argue for or support trump or the gop is, to me, as undesirable as herpes, at best.

 

I could rail on the flaws of the far left with vigor too but the volume and severity of trump and the long-sick gop has jumped the shark into their whole body politic being terminally ill. trumpsters aren't as bad as rapists in my book, but I can speculate it would be a better world for neither to exist.

 

I can't stand watching any number of well known dems on camera most of the time, but again the issues I have there pales in comparison to what i see on the other side. It's hard to me to think of more than a very few goper names out of all of congress that i wouldn't cheer to see retire from any form of public influence and, preferably, deport themselves to another nation---ideally, atlantis.

 

When it gets down to this putrid dysfunctional blob of orange piggishness who should be almost impossible to even watch for more than a minute for any decent human imo, and yet so many are willing to fight for this pigly pos potus, well that's just sick, stupid, sad, and often worse.

 

 

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

 

 

 

 

 

on another note---we do this site for people who are redskins fans to talk about the redskins---that's #1 with a bullet

 

then the rest is to add to "community" built off that core common interest/activity

 

and there are ways people who aren't redskins fans---mainly fans of other teams--to become a valued part of es by posting on football first of course, but also moving into the tailgate, too, like poker packer and many others over time.  

 

and there are real redskins fans who like to "live" in the tailgate and only post sparingly in the stadium. so lots of different niches.

 

but we do get a few over the years whose deal on es seems to be to promote their political agendas and that's how they manifest here in most of their content. and that can be done to varyingng degrees of "eh, ok" to "not ok."

 

 

that type of participation is one of the least desirable imv and that does matter

 

 

[LadySkinsFan]

That's why we have the ignore feature, that I use when, to me, posters are beyond the pale. I'm sure that I am a resident on others' ignore list, and that's okay too. 

[Cooked Crack]

 

 

 

[ThinSkin]

1 hour ago, Jumbo said:

Humans are humans (unintelligent design), thus any demographic we discuss gets to suffer that commonality.

 

And as I usually note these days when I am posting, "the left" is full of enough issues from silly to serious that they alone present a full time never-ending job to wrangle into a productive herd.

 

But, as you regs know per my take, the right wing is so much more diseased and ugly and crazy, overall,  that there is no contest. 

 

It's quite the tribute to the range of human cognition that even now there are those who feel trump and the current trump-ruled gop is something to argue for and defend . I have zero respect for that kind of "prioritizing", personally. I find it severely lacking of a decent ethical and moral base that's consistent in application, and in terms of logical rationale to support it,  and in awareness/internalization of facts extant in these matters (requires the ability to discern fact from belief/bias/bs propaganda).

 

Anyone choosing to argue for or support trump or the gop is, to me, as undesirable as herpes, at best.

 

I could rail on the flaws of the far left with vigor too but the volume and severity of trump and the long-sick gop has jumped the shark into their whole body politic being terminally ill. trumpsters aren't as bad as rapists in my book, but I can speculate it would be a better world for neither to exist.

 

I can't stand watching any number of well known dems on camera most of the time, but again the issues I have there pales in comparison to what i see on the other side. It's hard to me to think of more than a very few goper names out of all of congress that i wouldn't cheer to see retire from any form of public influence and, preferably, deport themselves to another nation---ideally, atlantis.

 

When it gets down to this putrid dysfunctional blob of orange piggishness who should be almost impossible to even watch for more than a minute for any decent human imo, and yet so many are willing to fight for this pigly pos potus, well that's just sick, stupid, sad, and often worse.

 

 

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

 

 

 

 

 

on another note---we do this site for people who are redskins fans to talk about the redskins---that's #1 with a bullet

 

then the rest is to add to "community" built off that core common interest/activity

 

and there are ways people who aren't redskins fans---mainly fans of other teams--to become a valued part of es by posting on football first of course, but also moving into the tailgate, too, like poker packer and many others over time.  

 

and there are real redskins fans who like to "live" in the tailgate and only post sparingly in the stadium. so lots of different niches.

 

but we do get a few over the years whose deal on es seems to be to promote their political agendas and that's how they manifest here in most of their content. and that can be done to varyingng degrees of "eh, ok" to "not ok."

 

 

that type of participation is one of the least desirable imv and that does matter

 

 

Way to be a wet blanket Jumbo.

[Llevron]

9 minutes ago, ThinSkin said:

Way to be a wet blanket Jumbo.

 

Super smart response 

[Jumbo]

13 minutes ago, ThinSkin said:

Way to be a wet blanket Jumbo.

 

 

the wet blanket is one of my signature dance moves

 

i put that out that for a few people to give it some thought, among other reasons

 

but while i'm replying to ya now, please go read rule 11

 

i think tk is getting close to taking drastic action on how rule 11 is just trashed in the tailgate and makes scrolling the threads more work (as the rule notes)

 

 

3 minutes ago, Llevron said:

 

Super smart response 

 

 

we only support super smart people here

 

well, and the moderators

[NoCalMike]

Did I just see correctly, Trump reviving birtherism?  Did he get the memo, Obama is retired and living the life.

[Sacks 'n' Stuff]

I got a rule violation warning from one of the mods. I want him investigated. What’s his real name? Where does he live? Gonna be a civil war on here if I get banned.

[Fresh8686]

From the FEC Chair, for the people who don't think what Trump did was a big deal...

 

 

 

[NoCalMike]

The FEC? That leftwing, communist, socialist, marxist organization? Pfffffffffffffffffffffffffffffft.  #MAGA2020

[CousinsCowgirl84]

3 hours ago, TryTheBeal! said:

 

Havent seen a Trump Job Approval post from you recently.

 

Hows he doing these days?

 

do you think he has a chance of staying in office 12 years? (Assuming it was legal). We still have powers of impeachment and congress for ballance of power.

 

 

 

edit:  I read your post entirely wrong, my bad.  He’s still doing better than most western leaders.  But is that really relevant?

[Llevron]

17 minutes ago, NoCalMike said:

Did I just see correctly, Trump reviving birtherism?  Did he get the memo, Obama is retired and living the life.

 

Naw that was from 2014 but twitter links show the date it was retweeted, in this case today, instead of the date of the original tweet now apparently. 

[Sacks 'n' Stuff]

5 minutes ago, CousinsCowgirl84 said:

He’s still doing better than most western leaders.

You’ve got to be ****ting me.

[CousinsCowgirl84]

2 hours ago, Llevron said:

 

I dont follow -- my bad 

I think a longer single term might help with some of the pitfalls of democracy.

1 minute ago, Sacks 'n' Stuff said:

You’ve got to be ****ting me.

 

in polling? No, I’m not.

[Sacks 'n' Stuff]

Just now, CousinsCowgirl84 said:

in polling? No, I’m not.

I thought you were talking about his performance.

[Dan T.]

I would rather not have these threads scrubbed of Trump supporters.  It's enlightening to hear whatever support or defense they can muster.

[Jumbo]

18 minutes ago, Sacks 'n' Stuff said:

I got a rule violation warning from one of the mods. I want him investigated. What’s his real name? Where does he live? Gonna be a civil war on here if I get banned.

 

 

i bet it was either the illegal or the terrorist one

 

the others are too busy watching porn to do anything

 

 

[Sacks 'n' Stuff]

2 minutes ago, Jumbo said:

i bet it was either the illegal or the terrorist one

I’ve got the guys from cowboyszone.com looking into it.

[Chachie]

3 hours ago, Cooked Crack said:

 

 

My question is this: Can't this be added to the impeachment inquiry?

[Cooked Crack]

 

 

[Llevron]

2 minutes ago, Chachie said:

 

 

My question is this: Can't this be added to the impeachment inquiry?

 

I think it depends on if there is a Qid Pro Quo (if I spelled that right) 

 

And in the case with China I think there is. But its all arguable enough that no one will admit it so I dont really know how much good that does us. Even if not, the Ukraine think is pretty cut and dry. No hiding that one. And that one is all it takes. His goal here is to obfuscate the process by making it questionable. Dont even add this into the equation imo

[Jumbo]

5 minutes ago, Dan T. said:

I would rather not have these threads scrubbed of Trump supporters.  It's enlightening to hear whatever support or defense they can muster.

 

i'd rather not too---duh

 

nor would such be a goal here as the rules clearly state

 

i think that's the majority view as well

 

however, as far as needing enlightenment goes, it's hardly challenging to find out what anyone's supporters think easily enough

 

 

and since it's you making the comment, dan, i'll add that you need get over this seeming frustration you have that you're not a mod 

 

this should have been a post in the feedback thread, and such has been pointed out to you more than once before 

 

i told you the next time you'd be on a long vacation, but i'm not counting this as that next time

 

i will count the next time as the next time 

 

now we all go back to topic----do not reply to these comments in the thread

[mistertim]

52 minutes ago, Jumbo said:

 

we only support super smart people here

 

well, and the moderators

 

Yeah but do you all fight your guts out as well?