Skintime Posted December 19, 2019 Share Posted December 19, 2019 2 minutes ago, mistertim said: Jesus...I didn't even notice that... Are they just trolling us at this point? Like, "Watch, we can literally make up names and call one of our talking heads 'Krystal Ball' and our goober followers will still swallow it up". Well, they really don't have minds of their own at this point. More like the zombies from Walking Dead. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larry Posted December 19, 2019 Share Posted December 19, 2019 10 minutes ago, TryTheBeal! said: Edit: Wait...there’s actually a talking head named “Krystal Ball” now?!? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain Wiggles Posted December 19, 2019 Share Posted December 19, 2019 Krystal Ball ran for a congressional seat in Va a decade back. Crazy Christmas party photos sank her campaign. She got a MSNBC show outta of it I think https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/krystal-balls-image-problem-racy-photos-virginia-congressional/story?id=11835899 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoCalMike Posted December 19, 2019 Share Posted December 19, 2019 Dude that Tusli interview where she tries to justify her vote. The very first thing out of her mouth is "He is guilty" That should have been the end of the questioning right there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TradeTheBeal! Posted December 19, 2019 Share Posted December 19, 2019 8 minutes ago, clietas said: Krystal Ball ran for a congressional seat in Va a decade back. Crazy Christmas party photos sank her campaign. She got a MSNBC show outta of it I think https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/krystal-balls-image-problem-racy-photos-virginia-congressional/story?id=11835899 *googles furiously* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
@DCGoldPants Posted December 19, 2019 Share Posted December 19, 2019 21 minutes ago, TryTheBeal! said: The gaslighting never stops. Edit: Wait...there’s actually a talking head named “Krystal Ball” now?!? She's been around for awhile. She was on a show on MSNBC I think for a few years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dont Taze Me Bro Posted December 19, 2019 Share Posted December 19, 2019 10 minutes ago, clietas said: Krystal Ball ran for a congressional seat in Va a decade back. Crazy Christmas party photos sank her campaign. She got a MSNBC show outta of it I think https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/krystal-balls-image-problem-racy-photos-virginia-congressional/story?id=11835899 How could one not vote for a hot chick grabbing the red dildo nose of her husbands reindeer costume? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zCommander Posted December 19, 2019 Share Posted December 19, 2019 24 minutes ago, TryTheBeal! said: Edit: Wait...there’s actually a talking head named “Krystal Ball” now?!? **** politics! Can she pick lottery numbers instead? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dont Taze Me Bro Posted December 19, 2019 Share Posted December 19, 2019 3 minutes ago, TryTheBeal! said: *googles furiously* LOL, same here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoCalMike Posted December 19, 2019 Share Posted December 19, 2019 *would be googling if not at work* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TradeTheBeal! Posted December 19, 2019 Share Posted December 19, 2019 5 minutes ago, Dont Taze Me Bro said: LOL, same here. Just now, NoCalMike said: *would be googling if not at work* Tame stuff. Looks like a fun party, really. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dont Taze Me Bro Posted December 19, 2019 Share Posted December 19, 2019 Just now, TryTheBeal! said: Tame stuff. Looks like a fun party, really. Yep, nothing that should have ruined her from running for seat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sacks 'n' Stuff Posted December 19, 2019 Share Posted December 19, 2019 Remember the good old days when a somewhat racy photo from a Christmas campaign could sink a campaign? Now a “Republican can insult John McCain for being a POW and his poll numbers go up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cooked Crack Posted December 19, 2019 Share Posted December 19, 2019 “What is thy bidding, my master?” Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted December 19, 2019 Share Posted December 19, 2019 Sending us their best? They are not. Actually, you know what? These days...this is their best. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
No Excuses Posted December 19, 2019 Author Share Posted December 19, 2019 11 minutes ago, Sacks 'n' Stuff said: Remember the good old days when a somewhat racy photo from a Christmas campaign could sink a campaign? Now a “Republican can insult John McCain for being a POW and his poll numbers go up. Different standards for men and women. Even bigger differences for white men and pretty much everyone else. Flip Trump's actions with either a minority man or a female of any color, none of them would survive the public shaming. Trump is the grossest example of the worst type of person in America and the entire apparatus that upholds him is far closer to him intellectually and morally than they would like to admit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted December 19, 2019 Share Posted December 19, 2019 Uh....ok. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cooked Crack Posted December 19, 2019 Share Posted December 19, 2019 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tshile Posted December 19, 2019 Share Posted December 19, 2019 re: Pelosi's comments about the founders and a rogue president and senate leader i was actually having that thought last night, except it's not just a rogue senate leader. At this point, for the most part, its a rogue political party, which is one of the only two main parties at which point, you realize we've reached a situation where our entire system of democracy/republic sort of unravels. if roughly 50% of the people in charge have decided that the constitution, laws, and what makes our democracy work don't matter and don't apply... what's supposed tos ave this at this point? That the military won't be cooped into supporting a dictatorship? Given the number of things that have happened in our political climate is anyone willing to bet the military is immune? I used to be, but now I don't know. The courts? We all know what happened with blocking obama appointees and the general tactics of the republicans when it comes to judgeship's (SCOTUS and federal). They haven't been tested. Is there faith here? I used to have that faith, but now I don't know. The voters and the 2020 election? 😂 The voters are how we got in this mess. 😂 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoCalMike Posted December 19, 2019 Share Posted December 19, 2019 Considering Tulsi straight up said she thought Trump is guilty of what he is being accused of, must mean she is subscribing to the theory that it should be left up to the voters as to whether law-breaking is okay or not and that elected officials who are tasked with oversight on the law breaking should throw aside their oversight. If Tulsi doesn't believe there is enough there to justify impeaching Trump, then fine, just say so and move on, but she seems to be wanting to have it both ways as try and not alienate folks who aren't going to be voting for her, that she thinks will vote for her. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jumbo Posted December 19, 2019 Share Posted December 19, 2019 31 minutes ago, tshile said: what's supposed tos ave this at this point? That the military won't be cooped into supporting a dictatorship? Given the number of things that have happened in our political climate is anyone willing to bet the military is immune? I used to be, but now I don't know. The courts? We all know what happened with blocking obama appointees and the general tactics of the republicans when it comes to judgeship's (SCOTUS and federal). They haven't been tested. Is there faith here? I used to have that faith, but now I don't know. The voters and the 2020 election? 😂 The voters are how we got in this mess. 😂 i'm sure the tailgate regs can handle it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
No Excuses Posted December 19, 2019 Author Share Posted December 19, 2019 26 minutes ago, NoCalMike said: Considering Tulsi straight up said she thought Trump is guilty of what he is being accused of, must mean she is subscribing to the theory that it should be left up to the voters as to whether law-breaking is okay or not and that elected officials who are tasked with oversight on the law breaking should throw aside their oversight. If Tulsi doesn't believe there is enough there to justify impeaching Trump, then fine, just say so and move on, but she seems to be wanting to have it both ways as try and not alienate folks who aren't going to be voting for her, that she thinks will vote for her. The dumb thing about Tulsi et al argument is that Trump's abuse of power is directly linked to his on going assault on our democratic process. Dude has been laundering nonsense conspiracies back to Obama's presidency in order to undermine our elections. Birtherism was an insidious conspiracy alleging that the elections were deceitful. His invitation/acceptance of Russian interference, while publicly denying that Russia did anything was impeachable itself. His bull**** claim that 3M+ illegals voted for Democrats, which just happens to be the margin by which he lost the popular vote, was declaring that our elections are compromised. Extorting the Ukranians to announce bogus investigations was a pathetic attempt at election interference. Everything about this ass clown of a President is about his desire to undermine faith in the electoral process, while using every dirty trick in the book to gain power for himself and the party apparatus supporting him. There are so many things that are awful about the GOP, but their turn into the InfoWars party, while knowing better is just blood-boiling and enraging. They know their own base voters are dumber than a bag of rocks but they are also exploiting the fact that many non-partisan voters tend to be low-information as well. In any decent Republic, parties share a responsibility to function by agreeing to a basic set of truths. But here President Dotard can just develop any stupid conspiracy, benign or dangerous, and an entire army of bootlickers will come to its defense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoCalMike Posted December 19, 2019 Share Posted December 19, 2019 Right and what is happening is that the "normal GOP" the ones with just the run of the mill bad GOP policy are being forced to playcate the Matt Gaetz & Gym Jordan Trump True believers because as soon as the establishment GOP threw in with Trump they basically made it a situation where they now need to continually go for the lowest common denominator in order to keep that block of the voting base on their side. Things they would normally speak out against, can't anymore or they will be deemed a "RINO" or Never Trumper or whatever. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KDawg Posted December 19, 2019 Share Posted December 19, 2019 So, I'm not a political guy at all. I have my opinions, but they're mine and I don't care to try to push my beliefs out into the world except for football... Just know I am extremely intelligent in all things and I am obviously correct in my personal leaning ( ). I just popped in to comment on the names Krystal Ball and Van Drew that are apparently a part of this whole thing. Is Ivana Tinkle in the running for anything? Or Amanda Hugnkiss? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TradeTheBeal! Posted December 19, 2019 Share Posted December 19, 2019 27 minutes ago, KDawg said: So, I'm not a political guy at all. I have my opinions, but they're mine and I don't care to try to push my beliefs out into the world except for football... Just know I am extremely intelligent in all things and I am obviously correct in my personal leaning ( ). I just popped in to comment on the names Krystal Ball and Van Drew that are apparently a part of this whole thing. Is Ivana Tinkle in the running for anything? Or Amanda Hugnkiss? Pretty sure the 2028 GOP nominee is gonna be a guy named Mike Oxbig. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.