Isifhan Posted November 17, 2017 Share Posted November 17, 2017 2 hours ago, DogofWar1 said: She wants to avoid accidentally running afoul of conspiracy charges, so she's lawyered up and undoubtedly seeking to get an immunity agreement. Can you expand on this a bit? How would one accidentally run afoul of a conspiracy charge if she's not suspected (and assuming she actually didn't) do anything wrong? Just curious about this. Iit must suck to be a low level person who genuinely did nothing wrong (not saying SHE did or did not) caught up in the Trump Tsunami having to hire lawyers and everything else if it's out of your own pocket. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larry Posted November 17, 2017 Share Posted November 17, 2017 15 minutes ago, Isifhan said: Can you expand on this a bit? How would one accidentally run afoul of a conspiracy charge if she's not suspected (and assuming she actually didn't) do anything wrong? Just curious about this. Iit must suck to be a low level person who genuinely did nothing wrong (not saying SHE did or did not) caught up in the Trump Tsunami having to hire lawyers and everything else if it's out of your own pocket. Completely hypothetical spitballing, here. She was present at the back room meeting in which changing the platform in a way which was requested by Russia was discussed. Shes not accused of being pro-Russia. In fact, she supposedly opposed it. And what they want her to do is to say, under oath, that "those people, sitting there at the defendant's table, did it". (If she can say "they said they were doing it because Russia told them to", that would be a bonus). However, she was at the meeting, the change was discussed, and the change did get made. She was a part of the group which did it. I can see why she might be concerned that she's getting close to a mine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted November 17, 2017 Share Posted November 17, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Predicto Posted November 17, 2017 Share Posted November 17, 2017 3 hours ago, Llevron said: That Bespalov kids goose is cooked now. Polonium hot pockets for everyone! 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StillUnknown Posted November 17, 2017 Share Posted November 17, 2017 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cooked Crack Posted November 18, 2017 Share Posted November 18, 2017 Quote One source familiar with Kushner's testimony before congressional intelligence committees said he specifically denied, under oath, that he was familiar with any attempts by WikiLeaks to contact the campaign. But, according to the source, Kushner was sent an email by Trump Jr. about his conversations on Twitter with WikiLeaks, which were first disclosed by the Atlantic this week. Kushner forwarded an email about the WikiLeaks conversations to communications director Hope Hicks, the source said. A second source familiar with Kushner's testimony did not dispute that account. Hmm. Not looking good for the Kushman. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sacks 'n' Stuff Posted November 18, 2017 Share Posted November 18, 2017 Well we know from the Russia adoption meeting email that Kushner isn’t a careful reader. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cooked Crack Posted November 18, 2017 Share Posted November 18, 2017 11 minutes ago, Sacks 'n' Stuff said: Well we know from the Russia adoption meeting email that Kushner isn’t a careful reader. "I didn't read the email. I just forwarded it with my eyes closed" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Llevron Posted November 18, 2017 Share Posted November 18, 2017 I want to know when Congress is going to do their ****ing job and demand answers from these people and hold them to the consequences 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Predicto Posted November 18, 2017 Share Posted November 18, 2017 24 minutes ago, Llevron said: I want to know when Congress is going to do their ****ing job and demand answers from these people and hold them to the consequences let's see.... Devin Nunez, Paul Ryan, Richard Burr, Mitch McConnell... that would be never 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PCS Posted November 18, 2017 Share Posted November 18, 2017 Yeeeesh. It's almost routine now with these dirtb....people. Member of administration or other asked about something dealing with Russians. Shown otherwise 3 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DogofWar1 Posted November 18, 2017 Share Posted November 18, 2017 2 hours ago, Isifhan said: Can you expand on this a bit? Larry basically got it. What did she know? When did she know it? How did she come to know it? She's clearly got some knowledge that interests the special counsel, and presumably learned it during the RNC. Depending on the answers to the above, she could hypothetically end up considered a co-conspirator. The other reason to lawyer up is in case there was a criminal activity afoot you were involved in that wasn't directly related to conspiracy/Russia. Like, say, if you overheard Carter Page talking about his sick nasty Russian trip where he totally set up a quid pro quo during the RNC's Official Hookers and Blow party, you might want to, maybe, have immunity before you tell the grand jury where you heard Carter Page talking. "So please describe when Carter told you about the quo?" "Uh...fifth." "Fine, immunity." "Well from what I recall I had just done 4 lines off a hooker's ass, I looked up, and Page said that the hooker kinda looked like one he met in Russia during his trip when he delivered the suitcase full of social media information to the Russians." "Thank you." 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Isifhan Posted November 18, 2017 Share Posted November 18, 2017 18 minutes ago, DogofWar1 said: .....hookers and blow Ah got it, thanks to you both! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted November 18, 2017 Share Posted November 18, 2017 (edited) Edited November 18, 2017 by visionary Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted November 18, 2017 Share Posted November 18, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted November 18, 2017 Share Posted November 18, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BRAVEONAWARPATH Posted November 19, 2017 Share Posted November 19, 2017 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted November 19, 2017 Share Posted November 19, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TradeTheBeal! Posted November 19, 2017 Share Posted November 19, 2017 $47 million? That's barely Kirk Cousins money. 1 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AsburySkinsFan Posted November 19, 2017 Share Posted November 19, 2017 1 minute ago, TryTheBeal! said: $47 million? That's barely Kirk Cousins money. Agreed, what’s that buy? A few dozen M-16’s, maybe a couple tents. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TradeTheBeal! Posted November 19, 2017 Share Posted November 19, 2017 22 minutes ago, AsburySkinsFan said: Agreed, what’s that buy? A few dozen M-16’s, maybe a couple tents. Seed money for Putins victory parade through the streets of Kiev. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheGreatBuzz Posted November 19, 2017 Share Posted November 19, 2017 4 minutes ago, TryTheBeal! said: Seed money for Putins victory parade through the streets of Kiev DC. FTFY 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AsburySkinsFan Posted November 19, 2017 Share Posted November 19, 2017 (edited) No no guys, it’s all good! Kuchner met with Torshin BEFORE we all found out about the Trump campaign colluding with the Russians, so we’re fine. Over a water-cooler discussion someone WILL repeat that line of BS as if it is exculpatory. Edited November 19, 2017 by AsburySkinsFan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted November 19, 2017 Share Posted November 19, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mistertim Posted November 19, 2017 Share Posted November 19, 2017 7 hours ago, AsburySkinsFan said: No no guys, it’s all good! Kuchner met with Torshin BEFORE we all found out about the Trump campaign colluding with the Russians, so we’re fine. Over a water-cooler discussion someone WILL repeat that line of BS as if it is exculpatory. Soooo....basically "It's ok because it was before we were suspected"? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now