Sacks 'n' Stuff Posted September 19, 2017 Share Posted September 19, 2017 25 minutes ago, twa said: Why? years of surveillance and investigation and still we wait. It's not like they haven't found anything. Just the stuff we know about from reporters and unclassified intelligence would have had you ****ting bricks if it had been a democrat. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
No Excuses Posted September 19, 2017 Share Posted September 19, 2017 NYT is also reporting that Mueller has told Manafort to expect an indictment. One also wonders how much trouble Michael Flynn is in, seeing that he has taken to the internet to beg random people for legal defense money. We've come a long way from "lock her up". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedskinsFan44 Posted September 19, 2017 Share Posted September 19, 2017 36 minutes ago, twa said: Why? years of surveillance and investigation and still we wait. These things take time. years? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twa Posted September 19, 2017 Share Posted September 19, 2017 Just now, Sacks 'n' Stuff said: It's not like they haven't found anything. Just the stuff we know about from reporters and unclassified intelligence would have had you ****ting bricks if it had been a democrat. since ya mention Democrats, odd that there are no threads on Menendez and such. well not really odd with this crowd. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Llevron Posted September 19, 2017 Share Posted September 19, 2017 Just now, twa said: since ya mention Democrats, odd that there are no threads on Menendez and such. well not really odd with this crowd. You can't start one? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twa Posted September 19, 2017 Share Posted September 19, 2017 Just now, RedskinsFan44 said: years? seems like years, wasn't Manafort started in 14? Just now, Llevron said: You can't start one? Why?....I already know what ya will say. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Llevron Posted September 19, 2017 Share Posted September 19, 2017 Oh ok Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedskinsFan44 Posted September 19, 2017 Share Posted September 19, 2017 3 minutes ago, twa said: seems like years, wasn't Manafort started in 14? Why?....I already know what ya will say. and yet we are always surprised by your compelling insights Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted September 19, 2017 Share Posted September 19, 2017 (edited) Edited September 19, 2017 by visionary Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LadySkinsFan Posted September 19, 2017 Share Posted September 19, 2017 Mueller wants to see/hear what WH officials produce. If they get nothing, which I think a bunch of them will assert 5th Amendment, which is their right, then we'll see subpoenas. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BRAVEONAWARPATH Posted September 19, 2017 Share Posted September 19, 2017 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twa Posted September 19, 2017 Share Posted September 19, 2017 Just now, LadySkinsFan said: Mueller wants to see/hear what WH officials produce. If they get nothing, which I think a bunch of them will assert 5th Amendment, which is their right, then we'll see subpoenas. He isn't going to give them immunity upfront like Comey did?...what a beast. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedskinsFan44 Posted September 19, 2017 Share Posted September 19, 2017 1 hour ago, twa said: seems like years, wasn't Manafort started in 14? I stand corrected, though the part concerning Trump is just over a year old. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StillUnknown Posted September 19, 2017 Share Posted September 19, 2017 19 minutes ago, BRAVEONAWARPATH said: this would explain the recent crazier than normal tweets & retweets 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cooked Crack Posted September 19, 2017 Share Posted September 19, 2017 Why's Trump even talking to Manafort? I was under the impression he barely knew him. Didn't Manafort only have a minimal role for a short time during the campaign? 1 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FanboyOf91 Posted September 19, 2017 Share Posted September 19, 2017 Time to make a reservation at the Ecuadorian embassy! 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AsburySkinsFan Posted September 19, 2017 Share Posted September 19, 2017 Dear Roger Stone: I hope this letter finds you well. I write to you today in response to a recent statement you made in light of the unfortunate situation that Paul Manafort currently finds himself in. You stated "The Feds were eavesdropping on my telephone calls with Paul Manafort during the innaguration and transition." I write only to correct you statement in so much as to clarify that when you talk with a person who is currently under FBI investigation and who at the time had legal Federal wiretaps then it isn't eavesdropping, you called a piece of **** Russian collaborationist and friend of Putin. If you don't want to end up on FBI recordings, then may I suggest taking better care of the scum you associate with. Sincerely, Me PS: I'd be careful of future calls to Flynn, and well anyone within 10 feet of Trump. #RESIST 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted September 19, 2017 Share Posted September 19, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LadySkinsFan Posted September 19, 2017 Share Posted September 19, 2017 Expect a subpoena. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DogofWar1 Posted September 19, 2017 Share Posted September 19, 2017 Question. Did we know of Manafort-Stone calls during transition/inauguration before? If we didn't before we do now. Thanks Roger. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LadySkinsFan Posted September 19, 2017 Share Posted September 19, 2017 Stone will probably skate. However, he talks so tough, he's hiding weakness so maybe he can be flipped. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FanboyOf91 Posted September 19, 2017 Share Posted September 19, 2017 That should make the donors happy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LadySkinsFan Posted September 19, 2017 Share Posted September 19, 2017 That's against FEC laws. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FanboyOf91 Posted September 19, 2017 Share Posted September 19, 2017 someone's triflin' with Bobby Three Sticks here Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted September 19, 2017 Share Posted September 19, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now