visionary Posted June 7, 2017 Share Posted June 7, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted June 7, 2017 Share Posted June 7, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted June 7, 2017 Share Posted June 7, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted June 7, 2017 Share Posted June 7, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mistertim Posted June 7, 2017 Share Posted June 7, 2017 "A strong ****tail of narcotics, benzodiazepines, and anti-nausea medications has been prepared in large quantities to assist in the ability of FLOTUS to be back around Donald Trump for extended periods of time." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted June 7, 2017 Share Posted June 7, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LadySkinsFan Posted June 7, 2017 Share Posted June 7, 2017 Dear Governors and Mayors, sorry, no infrastructure money for you. Now let's hit the links at Trump National! Oh, and don't forget to pay your greens fees. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FanboyOf91 Posted June 7, 2017 Share Posted June 7, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FanboyOf91 Posted June 8, 2017 Share Posted June 8, 2017 All we had to do was stay out of it, wait for it to implode upon the Saudis like every foreign policy gambit of theirs, and pick up the pieces. But, no, Trump had us latch on without giving any direction on how the anti-Qatar coalition should proceed. Now they (and we) look like backstabbing clowns. Can't wait for the Saudis to brib...er... convince Trump to send in US ground forces. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AJ* Posted June 8, 2017 Share Posted June 8, 2017 And Trump wants to follow this same model lol. Oh boy. http://www.latimes.com/business/hiltzik/la-fi-hiltzik-brownback-override-20170607-story.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LadySkinsFan Posted June 8, 2017 Share Posted June 8, 2017 All the states that follow the Brownback model are failing. Republicans want the United States to fail. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted June 8, 2017 Share Posted June 8, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted June 8, 2017 Share Posted June 8, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted June 8, 2017 Share Posted June 8, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted June 8, 2017 Share Posted June 8, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkinsHokieFan Posted June 8, 2017 Share Posted June 8, 2017 Morons are governing America. #MAGA Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bang Posted June 8, 2017 Share Posted June 8, 2017 This page literally reads like a hyperactive and very stupid bull running through a china shop, with no idea where to go or what to do. I-yi-yi. ~Bang Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skinsmarydu Posted June 8, 2017 Share Posted June 8, 2017 13 hours ago, visionary said: I think it's funny that there are already 9 FORMER Trump appointees. I may be wrong, but I don't think 9 people left Obama after his entire first term. Only prime one I can recall is Hillary. (Holder left later, iirc.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zguy28 Posted June 8, 2017 Share Posted June 8, 2017 Apparently ol uncle Bernie wants to put a religious test in place for Trump nominees for public office. http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/448393/watch-bernie-sanders-unconstitutionally-impose-religious-test-public-office EDIT: and please address the content of the exchange between Bernie and the nominee, not the source of the link's conservative bias. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Corcaigh Posted June 8, 2017 Share Posted June 8, 2017 If a nominee said that Christians have a deficient theology and are condemned to Hell, would they face questioning whether their anti-Christian views would inhibit their ability to serve all Americans? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zguy28 Posted June 8, 2017 Share Posted June 8, 2017 6 minutes ago, Corcaigh said: If a nominee said that Christians have a deficient theology and are condemned to Hell, would they face questioning whether their anti-Christian views would inhibit their ability to serve all Americans? I would hope not. And I would hope you would agree with that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sacks 'n' Stuff Posted June 8, 2017 Share Posted June 8, 2017 6 minutes ago, Zguy28 said: I would hope not. And I would hope you would agree with that. I dunno man. That's getting pretty close to hate speech. "_____ are deficient and condemned to hell." You shouldn't get a free pass for saying stuff like that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted June 8, 2017 Share Posted June 8, 2017 I thought nominees could be voted against for any reason. I've seen some pretty dumb and weird ones. Not really a fan of Bernie though and he's getting less relevant by the day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted June 8, 2017 Share Posted June 8, 2017 Is Clarke still getting a position in HS? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zguy28 Posted June 8, 2017 Share Posted June 8, 2017 36 minutes ago, Sacks 'n' Stuff said: I dunno man. That's getting pretty close to hate speech. "_____ are deficient and condemned to hell." You shouldn't get a free pass for saying stuff like that. So, an essential truth of Christianity, that salvation from Hell is only found in Jesus Christ, who is God (this implies that any theology that disagrees is deficient), is going to be considered hate speech. This is the new dogma of the secular worldview. Nothing can be exclusive, unless of course you disagree with any secular tenets, then its ok to exclude you. You see how self-defeating that is? 47 minutes ago, visionary said: I thought nominees could be voted against for any reason. I've seen some pretty dumb and weird ones. Not really a fan of Bernie though and he's getting less relevant by the day. That may be, and if that's the case, then its just Bernie acting not in the spirit of the Constitution (nothing new) and exposing more of his rancor (or maybe hate is now the appropriate word?) for those who disagree. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.