Zguy28

Warren got some church pulpit time to stump in South Carolina... preach on... https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/in-the-pulpit-on-the-curb-sanders-and-warren-take-2020-campaign-straight-to-sc-voters/ar-AAG1ewl Fear me you lord and lady preachers I descend upon your earth from the skies I command your very souls you unbelievers Bring before me what is mine The seven seas of Rhye

Truman used to say the same thing. It ebbs and flows.

I don't know, was it "heavily edited"? Yep. Get some Dubliner butter from grass-fed cows in Ireland. So good.

Well it is the PC USA, which is generally politically and theologically liberal (rainbow flags, gay clergy & marriage, and such). So, not much surprises me coming from that camp. But this is beyond wrong and just... ...

Disgusting and idolatrous.

Aren't you one of the guys who always gripes about "whataboutism"? By the way, I totally comprehend the position, even if I believe homosexuality itself is wrong. Subjective morality has multiple sides. You just happen to be on the side that is gaining the most adherents.

Simply because lots of people still believe homosexuality is immoral. And that people have a subjective view of what's immoral. What's so hard to comprehend about those facts?

You could take them to the public library...

When the people were pulled forward, their original past selves didn't change. You can't change the past, just make branches off the timeline... or something.

Maybe the school could do a GoFundMe to make up the difference? How do you know they aren't already trying?

I steer clear of that thread. lol If you want, I could post a thread on this: https://www.sfgate.com/news/article/Officials-Woman-dies-after-falling-into-meat-13790875.php

Holy smokes. Velociraptor's cousin. https://www.sfgate.com/news/article/A-Giant-Bird-Killed-Its-Owner-Now-It-Could-Be-13791678.php

No, but your Savior does. You know the truth. Dark nights of the soul can be agonizing. I have suffered it myself, yet also experienced intense spiritual times of refreshing. Even Mother Teresa doubted, and yet persevered.

Ok. In your counter argument, what is "good"? As in good vs. evil or moral vs immoral? When you accept the existence of goodness, you must affirm a moral law on the basis of which to judge between good and evil. But when you admit to a moral law, you must admit that there is a moral lawgiver. The moral lawgiver is God. If it is not, and it is humanity itself that gives the moral law (as you and many others here obviously believe), then it is completely subjective and who are you to say your opponent is wrong/bad/evil?