Duckus Posted December 10, 2015 Share Posted December 10, 2015 Well, there goes that theory that black men just need to "comply" with police orders to stay safe. It doesn't matter. Comply with orders, be brutally assaulted on tape.... not guilty. In the attack, Dickerson was knocked out and had his jaw broken despite never being guilty of committing any crime. Dickerson just happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time. He was on his knees with his hands on the ground when Webster delivered the jaw-shattering kick, leaving him unconscious.The case was taken before a grand jury in 2014, but Webster was not indicted. The case was reopened, however, when the Delaware Attorney General’s office took it before a second grand jury, who charged him with assault.... After a deliberation that lasted over three days, on Tuesday, the jury found Webster not guilty on both felony and misdemeanor charges of assault. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mistertim Posted December 10, 2015 Share Posted December 10, 2015 But the guy was obviously a "thug"...just look at his pants sagging. So he probably did something in the past that made him deserve the kick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Burgold Posted December 10, 2015 Share Posted December 10, 2015 Wow, that's an ugly video. Cop and court are deeply in the wrong here from everything we can see. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chipwhich Posted December 10, 2015 Share Posted December 10, 2015 Where is the link to what the judge said? I saw this video a while back. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Riggo-toni Posted December 10, 2015 Share Posted December 10, 2015 If only the department hadn't taken away their nightsticks, this cop wouldn't have been forced to use his foot and potentially injure himself. Officer safety needs to be a bigger priority. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mistertim Posted December 10, 2015 Share Posted December 10, 2015 Maybe he was just being helpful and was trying to assist the man in getting all the way to the ground. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
No Excuses Posted December 10, 2015 Share Posted December 10, 2015 Disgusting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheGoodBits Posted December 10, 2015 Share Posted December 10, 2015 If only the department hadn't taken away their nightsticks, this cop wouldn't have been forced to use his foot and potentially injure himself. Officer safety needs to be a bigger priority. Thank god he didn't hurt his foot, dude probably would have gotten shot for resisting arrest. Cop: "see look at that bruise on my ankle, I was defending myself." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mistertim Posted December 10, 2015 Share Posted December 10, 2015 Reading an article about it, the defense's arguments were pretty laughable.http://www.nydailynews.com/news/crime/delaware-officer-broke-black-suspect-jaw-acquitted-article-1.2459206 Webster said during the trial that he was trying to kick Dickerson in the upper body rather than the head and had been told Dickerson had a gun on him. The officer had seconds to act after Dickerson fled from the scene of a brawl and ignored commands to get on the ground, defense attorney James Liguori argued in his closing statement.The case hinged on whether Dickerson was in fact moving to a prone position or if, as the defense team claimed, he was in a “sprinter’s position” that would have allowed him to lunge or pull a weapon. He is shown with his hands on the ground just before the kick in the dashcam footage. Ah, the classic "I thought he had a gun" and "he wasn't following orders" routine. Seemed to me, from the video that he was getting on the ground pretty quickly after raising his hands. Also...sprinter's position? Seriously? ****ing idiotic. In addition, if you think someone has a gun...why are you getting so close to him? Wouldn't you be standing at a safe distance with your gun drawn and having him get on the ground that way? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sacks 'n' Stuff Posted December 10, 2015 Share Posted December 10, 2015 Wow. That's pretty bad. I was expecting to see SOMETHING that would make me say "well maybe he thought...." But nope. Pretty awful. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Sinister Posted December 10, 2015 Share Posted December 10, 2015 Maybe the guy threatened the officer telepathically. (might as well put that on the report) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kilmer17 Posted December 10, 2015 Share Posted December 10, 2015 Looks weful. So what do we do now? Legal system let him down. Now? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheGoodBits Posted December 10, 2015 Share Posted December 10, 2015 Looks weful. So what do we do now? Legal system let him down. Now? Civil suit seems appropriate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Destino Posted December 10, 2015 Share Posted December 10, 2015 Civil suit seems appropriate.Why? Money is a poor substitute for justice. If the man needs payment for injuries suffered he can get them, but to me that has nothing to do with it. What we need is accountability felt by the perpetrators of abuse, not an orderly system for paying victims. This is going to get worse, wait until the higher profile cases working their way through come back not guilty. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zoony Posted December 10, 2015 Share Posted December 10, 2015 That looks like incredibly poor training and even worse accountability Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twa Posted December 11, 2015 Share Posted December 11, 2015 White man shoulda went soccer style? compliance blow gone wrong....oopsie Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gamebreaker Posted December 11, 2015 Share Posted December 11, 2015 A year from now that same officer will likely end up shooting another "suspect" and we'll pointed back to this situation where he was let off the hook. Much like the double digit complaints the other officers who've murdered black men have had. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twa Posted December 11, 2015 Share Posted December 11, 2015 maybe he will kill a white chick Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gamebreaker Posted December 11, 2015 Share Posted December 11, 2015 maybe he will kill a white chick Unlikely, yet just as distasteful and repugnant. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DogofWar1 Posted December 11, 2015 Share Posted December 11, 2015 Civil suit is probably what's going to happen, and rightfully so. Broken jaws suck, and mine was a terrible month from a planned orthodontic surgery, not a break from a kick. Sadly, cop won't be paying out of his salary for it. Citizens of Delaware, your tax dollars at work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zguy28 Posted December 11, 2015 Share Posted December 11, 2015 This is terrible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Predicto Posted December 12, 2015 Share Posted December 12, 2015 Bad cops everywhere are learning an important lesson from this case. Deactivate the camera or point it the other way. Then people on the internet won't have a reason to get all riled up. You still don't have to worry about getting in any real trouble, of course. That rarely ever happens, even when you get filmed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StillUnknown Posted December 12, 2015 Share Posted December 12, 2015 you see some **** like that and the system can't agree that the cop ****ed up? depressing no wonder Daniel Holtzclaw cried when they convicted him, he legit expected to skate based on what he's seen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twa Posted December 12, 2015 Share Posted December 12, 2015 ****ed up differs from committing a crime. I doubt he intended to kick him in the head, and kicking is allowed.....thus reasonable doubt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StillUnknown Posted December 12, 2015 Share Posted December 12, 2015 ****ed up differs from committing a crime. I doubt he intended to kick him in the head, and kicking is allowed.....thus reasonable doubt. **** what he "intended" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.