LadySkinsFan Posted April 4, 2018 Share Posted April 4, 2018 (edited) So this popped up on my FB feed. Very interesting look at these people, and you know that they voted for Trump. https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=845202149001110&id=167115176655082&refsrc=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bing.com%2F&_rdr Edited April 4, 2018 by LadySkinsFan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bang Posted April 4, 2018 Share Posted April 4, 2018 How is it mass shooters always miss these people? I smell a conspiracy.... ~Bang Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LD0506 Posted April 4, 2018 Share Posted April 4, 2018 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted April 4, 2018 Share Posted April 4, 2018 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cooked Crack Posted April 4, 2018 Share Posted April 4, 2018 PornHub greets bloggers after YouTube gun ban introduced Quote YouTube has banned videos that show people how to manufacture or modify guns and their accessories. It had already banned videos linked to the sale of guns and accessories. Many firearms enthusiasts noticed that some of their videos had been removed from the video-sharing website and some had their channels suspended. Prominent gun video-bloggers said the move was an erosion of US citizens' rights, and some said they would move their content to PornHub instead. http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-43500714 Is that a gun in your pocket or are.... Oh it is a gun... Going to back out slowly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Riggo-toni Posted April 5, 2018 Share Posted April 5, 2018 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tshile Posted April 5, 2018 Share Posted April 5, 2018 (edited) NPR put out an article detailing how the nra shut down gun research https://www.npr.org/2018/04/05/599773911/how-the-nra-worked-to-stifle-gun-violence-research Edited April 5, 2018 by tshile 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted April 6, 2018 Share Posted April 6, 2018 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larry Posted April 6, 2018 Share Posted April 6, 2018 23 minutes ago, visionary said: Cue "He's being persecuted for trying to keep guns out of the school". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tshile Posted April 6, 2018 Share Posted April 6, 2018 So wait.... if you just break the gun down or lock it in a case you’re allowed to keep it? lol is this ordience supposed to help somehow? it sounds like a really dumb idea that’s more likely to get a scotus ruling against what they’re trying to do than ever be of any benefit to anyone You just break down your gun, now you’re in compliance. So no one has to give yo their guns and this will wind up in front of scotus and give the nra a chance to get such an idea ruled unconstitutional. Bravo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larry Posted April 6, 2018 Share Posted April 6, 2018 (edited) 36 minutes ago, tshile said: So wait.... if you just break the gun down or lock it in a case you’re allowed to keep it? lol is this ordience supposed to help somehow? it sounds like a really dumb idea that’s more likely to get a scotus ruling against what they’re trying to do than ever be of any benefit to anyone You just break down your gun, now you’re in compliance. So no one has to give yo their guns and this will wind up in front of scotus and give the nra a chance to get such an idea ruled unconstitutional. Bravo. Reading the first part of the article, I see a huge disconnect. I see claims that it doesn't apply to weapons that are broken down, or are carried by a person with a permit. And I see claims by the NRA that it criminalizes people who are carrying a high capacity magazine. OK, here's the actual law. (Actually, it's the a PDF of the minutes of the meeting. But the text of the law begins on page 79 of the PDF.) I've only read part of it, but it looks like the appropriate part is on page 86 of the PDF. Looks to me like what it says is that: 1) Use, sale, possession, or storage of an assault weapon is prohibited. 2) Unless it's in the possession of law enforcement or military (with some additional conditions.) (No, persons with a permit are not exempt.) 3) And, in order to be covered by the exceptions, the weapon must be broken down, etc. (That's where the "person with a permit" is mentioned.) (I'm not sure that's really what they intended. If it was, then I think they were really stupid. But that's what I read.) The ordinance does not regulate possession of high capacity magazines, only weapons. However, it does define the term "high capacity magazine". (Because part of the definition of "assault weapon" is "ability to accept a high capacity magazine".) (Note: As I read this, that also says that your rifle, pistol, or shotgun is defined as an "assault weapon" if it is capable of accepting a "high capacity magazine", even if the owner does not possess such a magazine.) Edited April 6, 2018 by Larry 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tshile Posted April 6, 2018 Share Posted April 6, 2018 Yeah... not to be a negative Nancy, but i think (based on what I know so far) this is not going to go as intended... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted April 6, 2018 Share Posted April 6, 2018 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dont Taze Me Bro Posted April 6, 2018 Author Share Posted April 6, 2018 Just now, tshile said: Yeah... not to be a negative Nancy, but i think (based on what I know so far) this is not going to go as intended... This has already been happening up there in IL for years now. http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/ct-supreme-court-highland-park-assault-weapons-ban-20151207-story.html My main issue with the ban is penalizing those gun owners that already purchased one legally prior to the ordinance being passed. I also disagree with ex-law enforcement being able to keep theirs, once out they should have to abide to the same laws/ordinances their fellow residents do. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted April 6, 2018 Share Posted April 6, 2018 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larry Posted April 6, 2018 Share Posted April 6, 2018 'Scuse me, while I whip this out. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted April 7, 2018 Share Posted April 7, 2018 (edited) Edited April 7, 2018 by visionary Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PCS Posted April 7, 2018 Share Posted April 7, 2018 https://www.rawstory.com/2018/04/nras-dana-loesch-says-mlk-might-alive-today-carrying-concealed-weapon/ Quote NRA’s Dana Loesch says MLK might be alive today if he was carrying a concealed weapon NRA spokeswoman Dana Loesch invoked the assassination of the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King to argue in favor of unrestricted access to firearms. The National Rifle Association representative singled out New Yorker contributor Rich Benjamin in a four-minute video posted online by NRA TV, and she suggested that King might have survived if he’d been permitted to carry a concealed weapon. “Despite his attempt to make King’s death a failure of gun control policies at the time, he finds no room to mention that King himself had sought to own a weapon, for his own self-defense, and he was denied,” Loesch said. King owned what one civil rights activist described as “an arsenal” after his Montgomery, Alabama, home was firebombed in 1955, and he sought a concealed carry permit — but was denied. “While Dr. King later on had a, yeah, because he embraced nonviolence, had a different view of firearm ownership, but he was very consistent with that, but he also recognized how important it was for everyone to be able to defend themselves,” Loesch said. Loesch said the lesson she learned from King’s life was to respect other viewpoints, and she positioned herself as a victim of prejudice and discrimination. *Click Link For More* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LadySkinsFan Posted April 7, 2018 Share Posted April 7, 2018 Idiot! James Earl Ray used a rifle long distance. These fools are woefully uneducated. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TradeTheBeal! Posted April 7, 2018 Share Posted April 7, 2018 13 minutes ago, LadySkinsFan said: Idiot! James Earl Ray used a rifle long distance. These fools are woefully uneducated. It really would have been great for the Civil Rights movement to have MLK rolling around strapped and squeezing off rounds at white Southerners. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tshile Posted April 7, 2018 Share Posted April 7, 2018 Black civil rights leaders carrying guns in the south during the 60s what could go wrong ? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted April 8, 2018 Share Posted April 8, 2018 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LD0506 Posted April 8, 2018 Share Posted April 8, 2018 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cooked Crack Posted April 10, 2018 Share Posted April 10, 2018 These kids are really triggering folks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Sinister Posted April 10, 2018 Share Posted April 10, 2018 Well, on top of already being nuts, he is likely a closet pedo. Nice, awesome group of folks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts