@DCGoldPants Posted April 25, 2017 Share Posted April 25, 2017 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Busch1724 Posted April 25, 2017 Share Posted April 25, 2017 So what does it mean that Flynn took money from Russia? Is Trump dirty or would this have been done without his knowledge? I mean we've speculated and evidence appeared to be there for quite some time. We've all discussed it ad nauseam, but now with this admission, it appears we're heading for charges, indictments, etc. Where does it go from here? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bang Posted April 25, 2017 Share Posted April 25, 2017 not too long from now it will be a year since i TOLDYA. Now how long before the dots are all connected?\ ~Bang Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BRAVEONAWARPATH Posted April 25, 2017 Share Posted April 25, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Llevron Posted April 25, 2017 Share Posted April 25, 2017 5 minutes ago, BRAVEONAWARPATH said: Thats a bad move for them. Dummies gonna dummie, i guess. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Burgold Posted April 25, 2017 Share Posted April 25, 2017 12 minutes ago, Llevron said: Thats a bad move for them. Dummies gonna dummie, i guess. Depends what's in them and whose fingerprints are on them. They'll turn 'em over after they've been doctored. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DogofWar1 Posted April 25, 2017 Share Posted April 25, 2017 47 minutes ago, Busch1724 said: Where does it go from here? The iHop menu. Because Flynn is toast. If Chaffetz is saying what Flynn did was likely illegal, it's basically lights out for him, he's getting indicted. This means his offer to testify in exchange for immunity had some actual reason behind it other than clearing the air as his attorneys said. Whoever hands up the biggest fish to fry will get immunity, the rest will get indictments. It will likely take some time, gotta get through the roadblocks (see: administration denying request for documents), but it'll happen. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
@DCGoldPants Posted April 25, 2017 Share Posted April 25, 2017 Flynn seems like the kind of guy who's going to keep offering bigger names than himself for something in return. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Llevron Posted April 25, 2017 Share Posted April 25, 2017 1 minute ago, Burgold said: Depends what's in them and whose fingerprints are on them. They'll turn 'em over after they've been doctored. Thats true. I dont see how they can come up clean from this though. Either they are going to sell out Flynn, who I would assume will take issue with that. Or they are going to have to side with and support him. Which is political suicide for all those not named Donald J. Trump and will start a whooooole new game. Just now, @SkinsGoldPants said: Flynn seems like the kind of guy who's going to keep offering bigger names than himself for something in return. Agree. Especially if those same big names try to send him up the river. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sacks 'n' Stuff Posted April 25, 2017 Share Posted April 25, 2017 5 hours ago, Larry said: Admiring the people who think that the US should be loudly protesting the unfairness of people outside Afghanistan supplying weapons to the Taliban. How do you feel about the people who are ok with it? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larry Posted April 25, 2017 Share Posted April 25, 2017 35 minutes ago, Sacks 'n' Stuff said: How do you feel about the people who are ok with it? Don't know. Don't think I've seen any. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sacks 'n' Stuff Posted April 25, 2017 Share Posted April 25, 2017 (edited) 11 minutes ago, Larry said: Don't know. Don't think I've seen any. Found a couple ? Edit: That 2nd picture is one of my favs. Gotta take advantage of any opportunity to post it. Edited April 25, 2017 by Sacks 'n' Stuff Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted April 25, 2017 Share Posted April 25, 2017 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mistertim Posted April 26, 2017 Share Posted April 26, 2017 12 hours ago, Llevron said: Thats a bad move for them. Dummies gonna dummie, i guess. Sounds like subpoena time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted April 26, 2017 Share Posted April 26, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sacks 'n' Stuff Posted April 26, 2017 Share Posted April 26, 2017 I would like the heads of everyone who got all pissy about the Flynn ouster now please. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Burgold Posted April 26, 2017 Share Posted April 26, 2017 7 hours ago, Sacks 'n' Stuff said: I would like the heads of everyone who got all pissy about the Flynn ouster now please. What bugs me is that they are still framing this as... "Did he do anything illegal?" There is no question. He never signed up as a foreign agent. He received monies he was not allowed to take as a member of the armed forces. He did not inform those he needed to inform. etc. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Llevron Posted April 26, 2017 Share Posted April 26, 2017 15 minutes ago, Burgold said: What bugs me is that they are still framing this as... "Did he do anything illegal?" There is no question. He never signed up as a foreign agent. He received monies he was not allowed to take as a member of the armed forces. He did not inform those he needed to inform. etc. Even better is that they consider it just an "Error". How does that even fly? Getting caught with a little tree on you is an "error" lol 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DogofWar1 Posted April 26, 2017 Share Posted April 26, 2017 I think at this point Flynn is well beyond the probable cause needed to issue a warrant, and likely beyond all reasonable doubt with all the evidence. The question now is, is there illegal activity from those who were not under the same restrictions as Flynn, seeing as Flynn had some special requirements due to being ex-military. My guess is that yes, there was, but it won't be as readily apparent as it is with Flynn. But it's crazy to think of the magnitude of this. An individual who violated the law, and whose violations involve being cozy with Russia no less, was our National Security Adviser. That is the kind of **** they shoehorn into movies but handwave the process of how they got there because no rational writers can ever figure out a way to do without tripping up our suspension of disbelief. I'm frustrated with how calm everyone is. I suppose there's time for it to sink in still, but a sense of urgency would be nice. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Busch1724 Posted April 26, 2017 Share Posted April 26, 2017 8 hours ago, Sacks 'n' Stuff said: I would like the heads of everyone who got all pissy about the Flynn ouster now please. 46 minutes ago, DogofWar1 said: 'm frustrated with how calm everyone is. I suppose there's time for it to sink in still, but a sense of urgency would be nice. To be fair, this all takes quite a bit of time. Also, innocent until proven guilty. Granted, from what's been released publicly, he appears guilty as hell. However, the investigation must run its course. If any of those pissy about his ouster are found to be involved or even on the fringe...yeah I call for their heads. What happened then is typical partisanship. Same would have happened on the dem side. Flynn isn't in his position at the moment, that's good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LD0506 Posted April 26, 2017 Share Posted April 26, 2017 1 hour ago, DogofWar1 said: I'm frustrated with how calm everyone is. I suppose there's time for it to sink in still, but a sense of urgency would be nice. This is the result of the intentional and overt ****storm of crazy that has been blowing, it was always meant to distract and exhaust everyone so that there was no possibility of reaction. It's working too. The trogs can't process it so they dismiss it all, anyone w/ a clue can't keep up with all of it, and those on the inside know it is a tactic to get what they want. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DogofWar1 Posted April 26, 2017 Share Posted April 26, 2017 41 minutes ago, Busch1724 said: To be fair, this all takes quite a bit of time. Also, innocent until proven guilty. Granted, from what's been released publicly, he appears guilty as hell. However, the investigation must run its course. If any of those pissy about his ouster are found to be involved or even on the fringe...yeah I call for their heads. What happened then is typical partisanship. Same would have happened on the dem side. Flynn isn't in his position at the moment, that's good. Oh of course, not challenging that the investigation needs to run its course or innocence under the law until guilt proven, but compare the panic levels on Hillary's emails during that investigation to now. It's not even in the same ballpark. Bunch of professionals quietly working and the public off about a million other things. The sheer sense of urgency that existed with Hillary's stuff is just totally absent. It's being treated like when Bush would throw out another Bushism, just another bad thing on the pile, when it actually has the potential to be the largest scandal in the history of the United States. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Burgold Posted April 26, 2017 Share Posted April 26, 2017 2 hours ago, Busch1724 said: Same would have happened on the dem side. Flynn isn't in his position at the moment, that's good. I am not so sure that's true. Look at Wiener and any number of cases where a Dem was caught doing wrong. Everyone immediately distanced themselves and pushed for his ouster. You can see plenty of similar cases on the D side. The Rs are more into cover ups, obstruction, and protecting their own. I am fine with saying both sides stink. I'm no longer sanguine about saying they are the same. They are not. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted April 27, 2017 Share Posted April 27, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skinsmarydu Posted April 27, 2017 Share Posted April 27, 2017 And Rachael reported his "accident" when it happened. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now