Boss_Hogg Posted June 7, 2016 Share Posted June 7, 2016 21. Washington Redskins Top five players: OT Trent Williams, CB Josh Norman, TE Jordan Reed, DE Chris Baker, OLB Ryan Kerrigan Starters who should be upgraded: OC Kory Lichtensteiger, LB Perry Riley, LB Mason Foster Washington landed one of the coups of the offseason when Norman unexpectedly became available in April. He adds a legitimate elite-level coverage player to a secondary that has shown ability, particular in the development of Bashaud Breeland. The Redskins' front seven has several good players, and overall this defense could be an impressive unit in 2016. On offense, Kirk Cousins cemented himself as the starter at quarterback, and there is enough talent for this team to be very good. Rookie wideout Josh Doctson has the ability to become an elite target, but he'll need time. The only major issue is in the middle of the offensive line, where Lichtensteiger was poor and banged up in 2015, causing major problems to the offense as a whole. The Redskins could move up this list rapidly if he can find his best form again, or if they can find an upgrade. http://espn.go.com/nfl/insider/story/_/id/15772400/nfl-ranking-rosters-all-32-teams-2016-depth-talent http://www.hogshaven.com/2016/6/6/11868588/pff-redskins-have-the-12th-worst-roster-in-the-nfl https://www.profootballfocus.com/pro/# #1 is New England and #32 is the 49ers. Perry Riley isn't a starter. The starting inside LBs are Mason Foster and Will Compton. Guess they forgot to check that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC9 Posted June 7, 2016 Share Posted June 7, 2016 These are the British kids that invented the stat that "if you score more points than the other team then you'll more than likely win the game" right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bang Posted June 7, 2016 Share Posted June 7, 2016 Ahh, June. ~Bang Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cliffmark1 Posted June 7, 2016 Share Posted June 7, 2016 I read it as if we upgrade the center position we have a good ball team. Fair analysis. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Califan007 The Constipated Posted June 7, 2016 Share Posted June 7, 2016 I read it as if we upgrade the center position we have a good ball team. Fair analysis. I read it as Chris Baker was better last year than Kirk Cousins. Yeah... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Conn Posted June 7, 2016 Share Posted June 7, 2016 I didn't read it. PFF sucks. Their methodology sucks, which means their grades suck, which means their rankings suck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkinsGuy Posted June 7, 2016 Share Posted June 7, 2016 I didn't read it. PFF sucks. Their methodology sucks, which means their grades suck, which means their rankings suck. Isn't this the article that is rating the team's based on the last two years instead of just this upcoming season? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gibbs Hog Heaven Posted June 7, 2016 Share Posted June 7, 2016 These are the British kids that invented the stat that "if you score more points you'll more than likely win the game" right? Who was the dude that used to throw PFF up all the time and we'd systematically pull it apart and make him look an ass each time he did? Hail. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC9 Posted June 7, 2016 Share Posted June 7, 2016 Who was the dude that used to throw PFF up all the time and we'd systematically pull it apart and make him look an ass each time he did? Hail. Darrellgreenie. Rest In Peace. Oh, and "The Kyle" too Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Conn Posted June 7, 2016 Share Posted June 7, 2016 I used to get TheKyle and Cooleyfan93 mixed up all the time until one got banned and left CF93 as the last toddler standing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC9 Posted June 7, 2016 Share Posted June 7, 2016 I used to get TheKyle and Cooleyfan93 mixed up all the time until one got banned and left CF93 as the last toddler standing. This was a visual representation of a conversation with "The Kyle" Curious to see how they think the Pats have the most talented roster. We'll learn a lot when Brady is suspended for the first quarter of the season. I think Belichik is the class coach of the league, but they are "getting by" at a lot more positions than we are. They also loved the Browns draft and the Jags draft. So they don't take a lot of things into account. Like, coming off an injury or drafting 18 WRs. It's specifically how the drafted player graded out in their system. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Sinister Posted June 8, 2016 Share Posted June 8, 2016 I used to get TheKyle and Cooleyfan93 mixed up all the time until one got banned and left CF93 as the last toddler standing. Until his parents finally come to pick him up... Been waiting forever Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elkabong82 Posted June 8, 2016 Share Posted June 8, 2016 Good. Let the haters keep doing their thing, and with incorrect information to boot. Our continued success is made all the sweeter when it flies in the face of persistent doubt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goskins10 Posted June 8, 2016 Share Posted June 8, 2016 If you read the entire thing on Hogs Heaven, you will see the silliest part of this. They have the eagles ranked as the 5th best roster in the NFL! Absolute joke! dallast is 12th! Reading pff is like going to Sam's club, you need to do the math to make sure it's really a good deal or not! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Renegade7 Posted June 8, 2016 Share Posted June 8, 2016 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skins island connection Posted June 8, 2016 Share Posted June 8, 2016 Well, on the bright side, we should have been considered over-achievers, eh? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Audible_Red40 Posted June 8, 2016 Share Posted June 8, 2016 Stat line: 24 completions - 35 attempts = 68.6 % 333 yards 5 touchdowns 0 interceptions 138.5 QBR Aaron Rodgers stat line vs. the Chiefs last year. Yet PFF somehow gives Rodgers a negative grade for that performance? How is that even possible? Thus, nothing to see here with their stupid calculations and football "analysis". http://www.foxsports.com/buzzer/story/pff-aaron-rodgers-negative-grade-packers-chiefs-mnf-092915 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BRAVEONTHEWARPATH93 Posted June 8, 2016 Share Posted June 8, 2016 If I'm not mistaken, part of the ranking is based on their rankings for previous years which I guess explains Philly being 5th Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkinsFTW Posted June 8, 2016 Share Posted June 8, 2016 Yeah, the Eagles had LeSean Mccoy, Mackin and DeSean Jackson 1/3 of a decade ago therefore they have the 5th best 2016 roster. Makes sense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedBeast Posted June 8, 2016 Share Posted June 8, 2016 Up from 32!!! Pfffffffffffffffffff... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ExoDus84 Posted June 14, 2016 Share Posted June 14, 2016 LOL @ Philthy being the #5 best roster in football. That alone discredits the entire POS article. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skins island connection Posted June 14, 2016 Share Posted June 14, 2016 I'd trust Mad magazine before PFF. And thats not saying much... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pjfootballer Posted June 14, 2016 Share Posted June 14, 2016 Great. Looks like PFF and myself are on the same page. I had them rated as the 79th highest rated sports website for information, just behind Don Crowleys Super Duper Football Emporium Blog and just ahead of Justin T's Football Predictions Paradise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HanburgerBum Posted June 14, 2016 Share Posted June 14, 2016 Isn't this the article that is rating the team's based on the last two years instead of just this upcoming season? How does it make sense to rate a team based upon the last two years instead of projecting the upcoming season? Weren't the Niners a Super Bowl contender two years ago? Even going with the past two seasons, it is hard to visualize the Eagles' roster as No. 5 in talent--5th from the bottom would be more like it. Having said that, I would rather the Skins continue to fly under the radar. It is always more advantageous to be under-rated than over-rated, because you will always catch some teams overlooking you if you are under-rated. Besides, with the back-breaking 1st place schedule the Skins have for 2016, they would be hard-pressed to top last year win-loss record even with an improved roster. 2017, after another Scot McCloughan draft, may be the season the Skins will be a legitimate Super Bowl contender. http://espn.go.com/nfl/insider/story/_/id/15772400/nfl-ranking-rosters-all-32-teams-2016-depth-talent http://www.hogshaven.com/2016/6/6/11868588/pff-redskins-have-the-12th-worst-roster-in-the-nfl https://www.profootballfocus.com/pro/# #1 is New England and #32 is the 49ers. Perry Riley isn't a starter. The starting inside LBs are Mason Foster and Will Compton. Guess they forgot to check that Cousins didn't even make the top 5 among the most important Redskins players? Really? Why limit the list to 5? Cousin is certainly among the most important Redskins players. Not only does he play the most critical position, he has brought competence and stability to it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wyndorf25 Posted June 15, 2016 Share Posted June 15, 2016 Slightly off topic, but with regards to the NFL's Top 100 List...Trent Williams is ranked #45 and that has me thinking, is Kerrigan going to be ranked this year? I mean it wouldn't surprise me to see him ranked somewhere in the next 10, but higher than that would be a real accomplishment and honor. That, and would you rank him higher than Williams? On the other hand, if he is not ranked at all, that would be a slap in the face. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.