gbear Posted September 26, 2019 Share Posted September 26, 2019 I just want to know what Nunes thinks about when he says dems want nude picts of Trump. I dont know anyone, Republican or Democrat, male or female who wants to see that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twa Posted September 26, 2019 Share Posted September 26, 2019 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Destino Posted September 26, 2019 Share Posted September 26, 2019 2 minutes ago, gbear said: I just want to know what Nunes thinks about when he says dems want nude picts of Trump. I dont know anyone, Republican or Democrat, male or female who wants to see that. Maybe Nunes is into old men shaped like the koolaid man. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elessar78 Posted September 26, 2019 Share Posted September 26, 2019 49 minutes ago, bearrock said: How can any reasonable person look at the complaint and think it lacks substance? One may question whether the allegations are true, but if they are, I would hope everyone could agree that it is clear abuse of power by the President. Even if there was no quid pro quo (I think circumstances show that there was, even if Trump never spelled out "give me the investigation for the aid". And I think he may have spelled it out in steps in conjunction with Guiliani), the mere act of asking another foreign government to conduct an investigation into your political rival would be an abuse of power. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PleaseBlitz Posted September 26, 2019 Share Posted September 26, 2019 50 minutes ago, RedskinsFan44 said: If you can't take the heat, get out of the kitchen. No one's perfect. His stance is basically that the President is above the law if his AG backs him up. Might want to consider how you would feel about that with a Democratic President. Also, drama. It's not his integrity that was questioned, it was his judgement. Every single person who takes a job for Trump immediately has questionable integrity. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
No Excuses Posted September 26, 2019 Author Share Posted September 26, 2019 Totally cool and normal for a President to insinuate that whistleblowers be harmed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sacks 'n' Stuff Posted September 26, 2019 Share Posted September 26, 2019 22 minutes ago, twa said: And when are we going to get to the bottom of Ted Cruz’s dad killing JFK? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skintime Posted September 26, 2019 Share Posted September 26, 2019 1 minute ago, No Excuses said: Totally cool and normal for a President to insinuate that whistleblowers be harmed. Why would he do that if he were as innocent as he says he is? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sacks 'n' Stuff Posted September 26, 2019 Share Posted September 26, 2019 21 minutes ago, Destino said: Maybe Nunes is into old men shaped like the koolaid man. You been looking at my browser history? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoCalMike Posted September 26, 2019 Share Posted September 26, 2019 Trump really can't help himself, can he? The stuff he says, the reactions he has. FFS. His buddy Putin likely still "handles spies in different ways" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Burgold Posted September 26, 2019 Share Posted September 26, 2019 2 minutes ago, NoCalMike said: Trump really can't help himself, can he? The stuff he says, the reactions he has. FFS. He has a G-d Complex. He thinks he's untouchable. The Republicans and FOX News, Breitbart, etc. have done their best to reinforce that notion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
No Excuses Posted September 26, 2019 Author Share Posted September 26, 2019 Very cool, very presidential. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StillUnknown Posted September 26, 2019 Share Posted September 26, 2019 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
No Excuses Posted September 26, 2019 Author Share Posted September 26, 2019 WH officials and GOP members: the media is twisting the President's words, he did not call for the execution of the whistleblower. Trump tomorrow morning ****posting on twitter: actually, yes let's hang the ****er. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoCalMike Posted September 26, 2019 Share Posted September 26, 2019 Seems like the whistle blower claims could be proven or disproven pretty easily if a proper investigation is allowed. You bring the whistle blower in, make sure you ask him who the other character witnesses in all of this are, bring them in to confirm or deny what the whistle blower has to say. Get the full audio transcripts pulled, weigh those against the accusations being made. Done. Isn't intimidation of a whistle blower some form of obstruction of justice? Basically Trump attempting to put fear in the whistle blower, since they haven't yet testified. Trump is basically following all the steps of "Here is why you should impeach me" The kicker in all of this is Trump said he was going to do this, on national TV. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoCalMike Posted September 26, 2019 Share Posted September 26, 2019 When Trump throws around the word "treason" having no idea what it actually means, it kind of shines a light into the corporate world side of him. I bet as a CEO he finds this kind of thing as legitimate treason, if an underling reported on wrong-doing. The problem is it doesn't work like that in gov't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twa Posted September 26, 2019 Share Posted September 26, 2019 5 minutes ago, NoCalMike said: Seems like the whistle blower claims could be proven or disproven pretty easily if a proper investigation is allowed. You bring the whistle blower in, make sure you ask him who the other character witnesses in all of this are, bring them in to confirm or deny what the whistle blower has to say. Get the full audio transcripts pulled, weigh those against the accusations being made. Done. Isn't intimidation of a whistle blower some form of obstruction of justice? Basically Trump attempting to put fear in the whistle blower, since they haven't yet testified. Trump is basically following all the steps of "Here is why you should impeach me" I'd warn of the precedent of such a investigation, but I'm enjoying this too much to care. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoCalMike Posted September 26, 2019 Share Posted September 26, 2019 6 minutes ago, twa said: I'd warn of the precedent of such a investigation, but I'm enjoying this too much to care. Wait, the "anti-Trump whistle blower?" That has been established by this fine twitter journalist how, exactly? Edit: Oh.....The Federalist. Makes sense now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sacks 'n' Stuff Posted September 26, 2019 Share Posted September 26, 2019 Yup yup. twa brings up a good point. Even if we somehow stop the GOP from covering up this latest crime, half of America is still going to be dumber than ****. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoCalMike Posted September 26, 2019 Share Posted September 26, 2019 Got a question for everyone, Now that all of this (whatever it ends up being) has come to light. What would Ukraine's role, if anything, be in this investigation? Is there any kind of precedent of going directly to them and asking, "eh....care to fill us in here?" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Springfield Posted September 26, 2019 Share Posted September 26, 2019 You guys read the complaint? It’s a short read. Spells it out pretty cleanly. Rudy don’t look too good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twa Posted September 26, 2019 Share Posted September 26, 2019 9 minutes ago, NoCalMike said: Wait, the "anti-Trump whistle blower?" That has been established by this fine twitter journalist how, exactly? Edit: Oh.....The Federalist. Makes sense now. The ICIG identified him as a supporter of one of Trumps opponents in the election......would you think that makes him neutral or a Trump supporter?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skintime Posted September 26, 2019 Share Posted September 26, 2019 12 minutes ago, NoCalMike said: Wait, the "anti-Trump whistle blower?" That has been established by this fine twitter journalist how, exactly? Edit: Oh.....The Federalist. Makes sense now. His sources for reading are a complete and total joke. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twa Posted September 26, 2019 Share Posted September 26, 2019 Just now, Skintime said: His sources for reading are a complete and total joke. Your complaints even more so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skintime Posted September 26, 2019 Share Posted September 26, 2019 2 minutes ago, twa said: Your complaints even more so. Find more credible sources. The fool that you use in the last one has years of backing trump in his twitter feed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.