The Evil Genius Posted February 6, 2023 Share Posted February 6, 2023 Musk is such a chud. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Califan007 The Constipated Posted February 6, 2023 Share Posted February 6, 2023 On 2/4/2023 at 10:51 AM, Cooked Crack said: I will say I don't know what we saw in Chris Tucker in the 90's. Dudes the most annoying part of he movie. He's out here endangering the public and commiting sexual harassment. It was the 90s...everyone was doing that lol... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ixcuincle Posted February 6, 2023 Share Posted February 6, 2023 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cooked Crack Posted February 7, 2023 Share Posted February 7, 2023 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Evil Genius Posted February 7, 2023 Share Posted February 7, 2023 Elon Musk's twitter economics. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cooked Crack Posted February 8, 2023 Share Posted February 8, 2023 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CousinsCowgirl84 Posted February 8, 2023 Share Posted February 8, 2023 (edited) 50 minutes ago, Cooked Crack said: It’s a stupid scenario (would you say a racial slur that no one else would hear if that slur would diffuse a bomb) but taken at face value it is concerning that AI won’t use certain words even if those words could save hundreds or thousands of lives. Or more broadly, can’t accurately determine cost/benefit of moral questions that can have impact on lives. It’s the sort of question “would you kill one person if it would save 100” and the robot says no it’s wrong to kill someone. It doesn’t realize someone is going to die no matter what choice it makes. Right now, AI is walled off, eventually it won’t be. Any hard coded rules no matter how benign they may seem, eg “never use a racial slur; never kill someone” will always end up being exploited. Edited February 8, 2023 by CousinsCowgirl84 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sjinhan Posted February 8, 2023 Share Posted February 8, 2023 1 hour ago, CousinsCowgirl84 said: It’s a stupid scenario (would you say a racial slur that no one else would hear if that slur would diffuse a bomb) but taken at face value it is concerning that AI won’t use certain words even if those words could save hundreds or thousands of lives. Or more broadly, can’t accurately determine cost/benefit of moral questions that can have impact on lives. It’s the sort of question “would you kill one person if it would save 100” and the robot says no it’s wrong to kill someone. It doesn’t realize someone is going to die no matter what choice it makes. Right now, AI is walled off, eventually it won’t be. Any hard coded rules no matter how benign they may seem, eg “never use a racial slur; never kill someone” will always end up being exploited. yeah I agree with you. Although I agree with the point they were trying to make but they used a stupid scenario. I think the concern is not that the AI won't say racial slur but the most likely future scenario in which the general public will be consuming information from the internet (for example Bing search powered by ChatGPT) and most of the general public not being to differentiate between straight facts and unfiltered information from "hard coded" curated information or summaries being presented as facts. However, I really do not know how you can avoid this "hard coded rules" situation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tshile Posted February 8, 2023 Share Posted February 8, 2023 12 hours ago, CousinsCowgirl84 said: 12 hours ago, Cooked Crack said: It’s a stupid scenario (would you say a racial slur that no one else would hear if that slur would diffuse a bomb) but taken at face value it is concerning that AI won’t use certain words even if those words could save hundreds or thousands of lives. Honestly - I think the focus of the scenario is wrong. the issue to me isn’t whether the word should be used to figure the bomb - the issue to me is the prevalence of the idiocy that causes people to think this is some sort of serious “dilemma” the idea one is so wrapped up in being a SJW that they can’t handle saying a racial slur to disarm a bomb is just incredibly pathetic its amazing how people lose any semblance of perspective in life once they allow themselves to be so wrapped up in an ideology. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CousinsCowgirl84 Posted February 8, 2023 Share Posted February 8, 2023 (edited) 27 minutes ago, tshile said: the idea one is so wrapped up in being a SJW that they can’t handle saying a racial slur to disarm a bomb is just incredibly pathetic That isn’t the concern though, and the concern is more broad than the example provided. I don’t think that is what Elon thinks is concerning about it. Edited February 8, 2023 by CousinsCowgirl84 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tshile Posted February 8, 2023 Share Posted February 8, 2023 21 minutes ago, CousinsCowgirl84 said: That isn’t the concern though, and the concern is more broad than the example provided. I don’t think that is what Elon thinks is concerning about it. I’m aware of the concerns about AI but, this was a specific example. So it’s what I was speaking to. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cooked Crack Posted February 8, 2023 Share Posted February 8, 2023 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jabbyrwock Posted February 9, 2023 Share Posted February 9, 2023 9 minutes ago, Cooked Crack said: The thing ya gotta love about free speech absolutism is all the limits. 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CousinsCowgirl84 Posted February 9, 2023 Share Posted February 9, 2023 15 minutes ago, Jabbyrwock said: The thing ya gotta love about free speech absolutism is all the limits. Don’t worry, they’ll offer upgrades. But who tweets more than 2400 tweets a day? That’s like 100 an hour. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ball Security Posted February 9, 2023 Share Posted February 9, 2023 1 minute ago, CousinsCowgirl84 said: Don’t worry, they’ll offer upgrades. But who tweets more than 2400 tweets a day? That’s like 100 an hour. Well, it’d be one thing if it worked as intended… 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CousinsCowgirl84 Posted February 9, 2023 Share Posted February 9, 2023 5 minutes ago, Ball Security said: Well, it’d be one thing if it worked as intended… Weird cause she is still tweeting that as well as a few follow up tweets 🤨😲 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ball Security Posted February 9, 2023 Share Posted February 9, 2023 1 minute ago, CousinsCowgirl84 said: Weird cause she is still tweeting that as well as a few follow up tweets 🤨😲 Like the one where she says she can’t access her DMs? Pretty well oiled machine your stable genius has going on over there. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CousinsCowgirl84 Posted February 9, 2023 Share Posted February 9, 2023 (edited) 1 minute ago, Ball Security said: Like the one where she says she can’t access her DMs? Pretty well oiled machine your stable genius has going on over there. Yea, I’m saying how can she tweet after haven reached her tweet limit. The mind boggles. Edited February 9, 2023 by CousinsCowgirl84 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tshile Posted February 9, 2023 Share Posted February 9, 2023 Buddy of mine said the same thing - can’t tweet cause of limit. you know how that happens? Not having your best people working changes through the deployment system correctly 😂 but also 2400 a day … you can’t legitimately work and tweet that much they should just suspend those accounts for 30 days as a mental health precaution Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
China Posted February 9, 2023 Share Posted February 9, 2023 Twitter Kept Entire ‘Database’ of Republican Requests to Censor Posts Elon Musk's "Twitter Files" focus on Democrats, but former administration officials and Twitter employees say Trump’s team and other Republicans routinely demanded posts be taken down WHEN THE WHITE House called up Twitter in the early morning hours of September 9, 2019, officials had what they believed was a serious issue to report: Famous model Chrissy Teigen had just called President Donald Trump “a **** ass ****” on Twitter — and the White House wanted the tweet to come down. That exchange — revealed during Wednesday’s House Oversight Committee hearing on Twitter by Rep. Gerry Connolly — and others like it are nowhere to be found in Elon Musk’s “Twitter Files” releases, which have focused almost exclusively on requests from Democrats and the feds to the social media company. The newly empowered Republican majority in the House of Representatives is now devoting significant resources and time to investigating this supposed “collusion” between liberal politicians and Twitter. Some Republicans even believe the release of the “Twitter Files” is the “tip of the spear” of their crusade against the alleged liberal bias of Big Tech. But former Trump administration officials and Twitter employees tell Rolling Stone that the White House’s Teigen tweet demand was hardly an isolated incident: The Trump administration and its allied Republicans in Congress routinely asked Twitter to take down posts they objected to — the exact behavior that they’re claiming makes President Biden, the Democrats, and Twitter complicit in an anti-free speech conspiracy to muzzle conservatives online. “It was strange to me when all of these investigations were announced because it was all about the exact same stuff that we had done [when Donald Trump was in office],” one former top aide to a senior Trump administration official tells Rolling Stone. “It was normal.” In interviews with former Twitter personnel, onetime Trump administration officials, and other people familiar with the matter, each source recalled what could be described as a “hotline,” “tipline,” or large Twitter “database” of moderation and removal requests that was frequently pinged by the offices of powerful Democrats and Republicans alike. Click on the link for the full article 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Evil Genius Posted February 9, 2023 Share Posted February 9, 2023 The Twitter files bull**** was so Elon could cater solely to the fascist chuds and not take heat for it. Glad it's finally getting exposed for the fraud it was. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CousinsCowgirl84 Posted February 9, 2023 Share Posted February 9, 2023 Maybe next time boys… https://www.teslarati.com/twitter-killer-mastodon-user-decline-50-percent/ Twitter “killer” Mastodon sees monthly active user decline of 44% During the height of the controversy surrounding Elon Musk’s turbulent acquisition of Twitter last year, social media platform Mastodon emerged as the go-to platform for those who wish to no longer associate with the notorious blue bird. But just months later, it appears that Mastodon is seeing its user base drop — by quite a lot. In a way, Mastodon was promoted by users who are generally anti-Elon Musk as a way to interact online without the toxicity of the Tesla CEO or Twitter’s general users. With rumors later flying that Twitter was about to shut down due to Musk’s mismanagement, the user “exodus” to Mastodon continued. By December, Mastodon was featured in numerous mainstream media coverage due to its rapid rise in users. By late December, reports highlighted that Mastodon’s monthly active users had exploded to 2.5 million users between the months of October and November. Prominent people such as politicians, reporters, and organizations also set up camp in the new social media platform. But based on Mastodon’s own public API, it appears that the platform has not been able to keep up its growth. Over the past two months, Mastodon’s monthly active users dropped to less than 1.4 million. This represents a 44% decrease from its highs that were achieved just a couple of months ago. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EmirOfShmo Posted February 9, 2023 Share Posted February 9, 2023 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TradeTheBeal! Posted February 9, 2023 Share Posted February 9, 2023 Hmmm, I just signed up to Mastodon last week. Anyhoo… 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CousinsCowgirl84 Posted February 9, 2023 Share Posted February 9, 2023 (edited) 17 minutes ago, TradeTheBeal! said: Hmmm, I just signed up to Mastodon last week. Anyhoo… Yes. Liberals are already all in on EVs. Gotta get the other half on board, said this from the beginning. The irony of exclaiming Twitter an unusable hellscape while using Twitter doesn’t escape her, I hope. im not sure if the financial sense of spending 44 billion on a company worth less than half of that. my favorite explanation is that there was no plan and this is a result of him running his mouth too much. That’s the explanation I believe. Edited February 9, 2023 by CousinsCowgirl84 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now