twa Posted April 27, 2018 Share Posted April 27, 2018 https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/case-closed-fbi-says-sessions-didnt-have-to-reveal-russia-talks https://www.cnbc.com/2018/03/21/attorney-general-jeff-sessions-not-under-investigation-for-perjury.html https://nypost.com/2018/03/31/the-real-reason-behind-sessions-special-counsel-decision/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sacks 'n' Stuff Posted April 27, 2018 Share Posted April 27, 2018 1 hour ago, twa said: https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/case-closed-fbi-says-sessions-didnt-have-to-reveal-russia-talks https://nypost.com/2018/03/31/the-real-reason-behind-sessions-special-counsel-decision/ Is this the type of source you go to for your information? These two articles are idiotic. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
No Excuses Posted April 27, 2018 Share Posted April 27, 2018 7 hours ago, twa said: https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/case-closed-fbi-says-sessions-didnt-have-to-reveal-russia-talks https://www.cnbc.com/2018/03/21/attorney-general-jeff-sessions-not-under-investigation-for-perjury.html https://nypost.com/2018/03/31/the-real-reason-behind-sessions-special-counsel-decision/ Your idiotic theories are easily disproven if you even bother doing 1% of the required work to fact check. Quote “They said that since I had involvement with the campaign, I should not be involved in any campaign investigation,” Sessions said. He added that he concurred with their assessment and would thus recuse himself from any existing or future investigation involving President Trump’s 2016 campaign. His recusal has always been about his general involvement in the campaign. But have fun twisting yourself into a pretzel to argue this. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twa Posted April 27, 2018 Share Posted April 27, 2018 Going back to the post I responded to and going back to his specific response he is clearly not recused from commenting on the matter publicly as Rubin suggested. he is still allowing another to oversee the independent investigation by choice Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
No Excuses Posted April 27, 2018 Share Posted April 27, 2018 9 hours ago, twa said: He is no longer under his self imposed recusal. This what you have been saying, and it is 100% factually wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larry Posted April 27, 2018 Share Posted April 27, 2018 33 minutes ago, No Excuses said: This what you have been saying, and it is 100% factually wrong. Well, in twa’s defense, I’m pretty sure that Sessions hasn’t really, completely, recused himself. Maybe that’s what he means. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twa Posted April 27, 2018 Share Posted April 27, 2018 10 minutes ago, Larry said: Well, in twa’s defense, I’m pretty sure that Sessions hasn’t really, completely, recused himself. Maybe that’s what he means. Pretty clear that is it. 49 minutes ago, No Excuses said: This what you have been saying, and it is 100% factually wrong. His recusal at the time quoted is not the same as he now operates under and the limits are his own......Which OBVIOUSLY does not include commenting on the matter. Which makes you wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AsburySkinsFan Posted April 27, 2018 Share Posted April 27, 2018 Sessions’ recusal was only for official decision making and assigning Mueller et al, Sessions was ALWAYS going to interfere with the investigation indirectly because the investigation includes him and at the very least his knowledge that the Russians were reaching out to provide the Trump campaign with compromising intel. And I guarantee you, that his response when he heard it was, “Our hands cannot be on the intel, it needs to be presented by a third party like Wikileaks.” 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
No Excuses Posted April 27, 2018 Share Posted April 27, 2018 (edited) 26 minutes ago, twa said: His recusal at the time quoted is not the same as he now operates under and the limits are his own Nice shifting of the goal posts. This is also complete BS. The nature of his recusal has not changed. I really don't care about the "commenting" issue. He can say whatever he wants and I'm sure Mueller wouldn't mind another obstruction investigation and I'm sure Sessions is aware of that. This is the part where you start mental gymnastics to continue defending a blatantly false claim you made even after being given evidence against it. Continue on. Edited April 27, 2018 by No Excuses 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BRAVEONAWARPATH Posted April 27, 2018 Share Posted April 27, 2018 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twa Posted April 27, 2018 Share Posted April 27, 2018 Just now, No Excuses said: Nice shifting of the goal posts. This is also complete BS. The nature of his recusal has not changed. I really don't care about the "commenting" issue. He can say whatever he wants and I'm sure Mueller wouldn't mind another obstruction investigation and I'm sure Sessions is aware of that. This is the part where you start mental gymnastics to continue defending a blatantly false claim you made. Continue on. The blatantly false claim was made in the Rubin post I originally responded to and even SHE qualified her claim by using the term 'arguably" in the oped . What do arguably mean? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AsburySkinsFan Posted April 27, 2018 Share Posted April 27, 2018 9 minutes ago, BRAVEONAWARPATH said: I’m shoked I tell ya...just shocked! 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
No Excuses Posted April 27, 2018 Share Posted April 27, 2018 (edited) 10 minutes ago, twa said: The blatantly false claim was made in the Rubin post I originally responded to and even SHE qualified her claim by using the term 'arguably" in the oped . What do arguably mean? My dude, I don't care about Jennifer Ruben or what she said. You literally have been arguing that Sessions is no longer under his own self imposed recusal because of some BS you read on conservablogs. This is simply not true. The nature of his recusal has not shifted. How he chooses to conduct himself ethically is at the end of the day, his own personal choice. But it doesn't change the facts of the initial recusal. That is all I wanted to point out. Bye. Edited April 27, 2018 by No Excuses Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twa Posted April 27, 2018 Share Posted April 27, 2018 1 minute ago, No Excuses said: My dude, I don't care about Jennifer Ruben or what she said. You literally have been arguing that Sessions is no longer under his own self imposed recusal because of some BS you read on conservablogs. This is simply not true. That is all I wanted to point out. Bye. Dude, you don't care about the context of what I responded to? Bye. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan T. Posted April 27, 2018 Share Posted April 27, 2018 1 hour ago, No Excuses said: My dude, I don't care about Jennifer Ruben or what she said. ... That is all I wanted to point out. Bye. 57 minutes ago, twa said: Dude, you don't care about the context of what I responded to? Bye. I got a weird sense of Deja Vu reading this exchange. Not the content so much as the tone. Then it hit me. Carry on. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DogofWar1 Posted April 27, 2018 Share Posted April 27, 2018 Yeah, glad we got hard proof of what we've basically known since this thing started, Russian lawyer is Kremlin agent. I'm going to adopt the position that them talking only about adoptions is some bull. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LadySkinsFan Posted April 27, 2018 Share Posted April 27, 2018 Bad news for Manafort, his civil case challenging Mueller's appointment as Special Counsel was tossed out of Federal court. https://www.thedailybeast.com/judge-dismisses-manafort-civil-case-disputing-muellers-authority 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AsburySkinsFan Posted April 27, 2018 Share Posted April 27, 2018 Like that case ever stood a chance. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted April 27, 2018 Share Posted April 27, 2018 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted April 27, 2018 Share Posted April 27, 2018 (edited) Edited April 27, 2018 by visionary 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LadySkinsFan Posted April 27, 2018 Share Posted April 27, 2018 All these fools getting played by the Russians. For money. How dirty. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted April 27, 2018 Share Posted April 27, 2018 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larry Posted April 27, 2018 Share Posted April 27, 2018 34 minutes ago, LadySkinsFan said: All these fools getting played by the Russians. For money. How dirty. Not for money. For power. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LadySkinsFan Posted April 27, 2018 Share Posted April 27, 2018 50 minutes ago, Larry said: Not for money. For power. Power first, money second! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FanboyOf91 Posted April 27, 2018 Share Posted April 27, 2018 1 minute ago, LadySkinsFan said: Power first, money second! 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now