Jump to content
Washington Football Team Logo
Extremeskins
Forum Rules and Guidelines

Moose & Squirrel v Boris & Natasha: what's the deal with the rooskies and trumpland?

Jumbo

By Jumbo
in The Tailgate

 Share

Recommended Posts

LD0506

LD0506

Posted
Posted

My take from that was two-fold, they didn't know that Mueller had already gotten access to the emails, ie. either they knew and no one mentioned it or they actually are as criminally incompetent as we thought, and Mueller's team had a firm basis for asking particular questions that would lead them into the quicksand and more charges for lying, perjury, obstruction, etc. are in the offing.

 

It's laughable, when you look at the legal assassins Bob has on his team and compare them to the third rate hucksters that the * has defending him, it's no contest about who understands the legal ramifications better.

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
LD0506

LD0506

Posted
Posted
16 minutes ago, AsburySkinsFan said:

 

 

So once again, we see just how damaged they are, they cannot even grasp spelling fer crissakes. The G in GSA ****tards, what does the G mean? Their services, their devices, it is all government monitored and archived. That's what they do. Showing someone a letter from a dead guy and claiming it covers all your lameass excuses isn't gonna cut it.

 

If SNL writers even suggested half of this idiocy for a skit they get laughed out of the room, it is just beyond comprehension how any of these so-called lawyers have not starved to death long ago. I flushed more basic common sense this morning than any of them display.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
twa

twa

Posted
Posted
Just now, AsburySkinsFan said:

 

 

Oddly enough the GSA thought differently at first according to the buzzfeed story and thought a subpoena or warrant needed .

 

wonder where they got that impression?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
daveakl

daveakl

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, twa said:

 

Oddly enough the GSA thought differently at first according to the buzzfeed story and thought a subpoena or warrant needed .

 

wonder where they got that impression?

 

Sort of. From the article:

 

"Langhofer also said that a GSA official appointed by Trump in May had assured the transition in June that any request for records from Mueller's office would be referred to the transition's attorneys"

 

What that sounds like is a new person that just joined the GSA said something to Trumps team that turned out not to be true. I don't see anything in the article that says the GSA thought a subpoena or warrant was needed though. Can you quote that text?

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
twa

twa

Posted
Posted
Just now, daveakl said:

Sort of. From the article:

 

"Langhofer also said that a GSA official appointed by Trump in May had assured the transition in June that any request for records from Mueller's office would be referred to the transition's attorneys"

 

What that sounds like is a new person that just joined the GSA said something to Trumps team that turned out not to be true. I don't see anything in the article that says the GSA thought a subpoena or warrant was needed though. Can you quote that text?

 

 

Quote

 

Loewentritt told BuzzFeed News that the GSA initially "suggested a warrant or subpoena" for the materials, but that the Special Counsel's Office determined the letter route was sufficient.

As to whether the Trump campaign should have been informed of the request, Loewentritt said, "That's between the Special Counsel and the transition team."

 

 

is the Special Counsels determination correct?....or just avoids a judge

 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
twa

twa

Posted
Posted
Just now, No Excuses said:

If there was anything illegal about obtaining these emails, the course of action by Team Trump wouldn’t be a whiny letter to Congress.

 

They can this to court but they won’t. Because the emails weren’t improperly obtained.

 

Interesting distinction ,you shift from illegal to improper.

 

I'd guess it was improper, and the GSA's initial reaction supports that assumption.

 

Just now, No Excuses said:

Resident law expert twa explaining why government investigators can’t obtain .gov emails is ES Tailgate at its finest.

 

Oh there certainly exist a number of ways to properly attain them.....odd you want to change it to I said they can't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Sacks 'n' Stuff

Sacks 'n' Stuff

Posted
Posted (edited)
14 minutes ago, twa said:

I'd guess it was improper, and the GSA's initial reaction supports that assumption.

Improper :rofl89:. Those meany criminal investigators. You collude with one little Russia and they get all improper on you.

 

Guess what everybody, these guys aren't ****ing around. Blaming Hillary & Obama or screaming about emails ain't gonna cut it.

Edited by Sacks 'n' Stuff
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
twa

twa

Posted
Posted
Just now, Sacks 'n' Stuff said:

Improper :rofl89:. Those meany criminal investigators. You collude with one little Russia and they get all improper on you.

 

Guess what everybody, these guys aren't ****ing around. Blaming Hillary & Obama or screaming about emails ain't gonna cut it.

 

the line between improper and illegal gets fuzzy, like with a forbidden server, deleting emails and unapproved devices and improper retention. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
AsburySkinsFan

AsburySkinsFan

Posted
Posted
14 minutes ago, visionary said:
 

 

Translation: “We know how to do our effing jobs, and we’re effing good at it.”

 

It should also be noted that they used the term “criminal process.” 

4 minutes ago, twa said:

 

the line between improper and illegal gets fuzzy

No, it’s not. Saying so doesn’t make it so.

Only shilling GOPers want to believe that everyone else is as corrupt as the troll THEY put into office!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
twa

twa

Posted
Posted
Just now, AsburySkinsFan said:

Translation: “We know how to do our effing jobs, and we’re effing good at it.”

 

It should also be noted that they used the term “criminal process.” 

 

or account holders consent.....who is the account holder?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
AsburySkinsFan

AsburySkinsFan

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, twa said:

 

or account holders consent.....who is the account holder?

 

 

Did you READ the whole thing or are you just going to quote half of what the Mueller i vestigators are saying?

Trump team: “Mueller team acted improperly in acquiring emails.”

Translation: “We don’t know how the govefnment works, and weren’t aware that there was more than one way to skin cat.”

This is a good tweet chain.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
twa

twa

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, DogofWar1 said:

Flynn and Papadopoulis were account holders.

 

They've also flipped.

 

so you are saying they flipped before Mueller;s team got the emails and they are limited to just those two email chains?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...