RedskinsFan44 Posted June 14, 2017 Share Posted June 14, 2017 2 hours ago, twa said: So he is running about where Bill Clinton was at this point. http://www.gallup.com/poll/116584/presidential-approval-ratings-bill-clinton.aspx Yeah, but Clinton's Disapproval maxed out at 50. Tump is at 60. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
justice98 Posted June 14, 2017 Share Posted June 14, 2017 4 hours ago, mistertim said: Wow, I didn't realize this. So essentially the WH can ignore anything Mueller requests as long as the AG vetoes it and they don't have to tell anyone at all? Rosenstein has been in front of Congress twice and wasn't asked about this possibility once, just to get him on the record about it. Having said that, since he's the one that put Mueller in place when his bosses were against it, I don't suspect he's eager to step in and prevent him from doing his job. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TradeTheBeal! Posted June 14, 2017 Share Posted June 14, 2017 49 minutes ago, LadySkinsFan said: Watching the Cuban missile crisis on JFK Remembered: 50 Years Later. Russians haven't changed. It should be treason to tell them our intelligence data. Trump Organization should be precluded from doing business with Russians. Seconded. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twa Posted June 14, 2017 Share Posted June 14, 2017 31 minutes ago, justice98 said: Rosenstein has been in front of Congress twice and wasn't asked about this possibility once, just to get him on the record about it. Having said that, since he's the one that put Mueller in place when his bosses were against it, I don't suspect he's eager to step in and prevent him from doing his job. I believe he was asked about that and said he would have whatever he needed. Problem is the AG does not direct the WH, that type of issue requires the court.(as has been done many times) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FanboyOf91 Posted June 14, 2017 Share Posted June 14, 2017 Some hearty applause for a rare moment of bipartisanship in extending sanctions today! 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skinny21 Posted June 15, 2017 Share Posted June 15, 2017 (edited) Senate overwhelmingly passes Russia sanctions deal with new limits on Trump http://www.politico.com/story/2017/06/14/senate-passes-russia-sanctions-trump-limits-239553?cid=apn Wow, 97-2 vote. Let's see what the House does with it... (nice to see McCain putting some action to his words) Edited June 15, 2017 by skinny21 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sacks 'n' Stuff Posted June 15, 2017 Share Posted June 15, 2017 5 hours ago, skinny21 said: (nice to see McCain putting some action to his words) He thought he was voting on lunch... Pastrami. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted June 15, 2017 Share Posted June 15, 2017 (edited) hmmm, ok. Ok...what? Edited June 15, 2017 by visionary 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted June 15, 2017 Share Posted June 15, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted June 15, 2017 Share Posted June 15, 2017 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
@DCGoldPants Posted June 15, 2017 Share Posted June 15, 2017 "my non-dealings" 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
@DCGoldPants Posted June 15, 2017 Share Posted June 15, 2017 (edited) Well damn. Posted in another thread. Russia, Comey, Admin in general. Let's just combine them all. Edited June 15, 2017 by @SkinsGoldPants Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted June 15, 2017 Share Posted June 15, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted June 15, 2017 Share Posted June 15, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted June 16, 2017 Share Posted June 16, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skinny21 Posted June 16, 2017 Share Posted June 16, 2017 The Hard Truth Keeps Trickling Out, Little by Little It increasingly looks like Russian hackers may have affected actual vote totals. http://www.esquire.com/news-politics/politics/news/a55603/russia-hack-voting-totals/ I'm not sure why the article keeps saying 'ratfcking', but it's pretty damn funny... I was convinced it was a BS article because of it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twa Posted June 16, 2017 Share Posted June 16, 2017 the mans a hack, but the 'ratfcking' was cute. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DogofWar1 Posted June 16, 2017 Share Posted June 16, 2017 Trump's (ex)lawyer Michael Cohen has hired a lawyer. You know an investigation is the fakest of fake news when lawyers start hiring lawyers. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Llevron Posted June 16, 2017 Share Posted June 16, 2017 3 minutes ago, DogofWar1 said: Trump's (ex)lawyer Michael Cohen has hired a lawyer. You know an investigation is the fakest of fake news when lawyers start hiring lawyers. Yeaaaa thats a bad sign (or good. Depends on if you are good or evil, i guess) 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mistertim Posted June 16, 2017 Share Posted June 16, 2017 7 minutes ago, DogofWar1 said: Trump's (ex)lawyer Michael Cohen has hired a lawyer. You know an investigation is the fakest of fake news when lawyers start hiring lawyers. "Says who?? SAYS WHO??" 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
No Excuses Posted June 16, 2017 Share Posted June 16, 2017 11 minutes ago, DogofWar1 said: Trump's (ex)lawyer Michael Cohen has hired a lawyer. You know an investigation is the fakest of fake news when lawyers start hiring lawyers. Lawyers for lawyers I feel like someone made this joke on here earlier. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DogofWar1 Posted June 16, 2017 Share Posted June 16, 2017 Also very important to note: Trump's conversations with Rosenstein are no longer privileged. I mean, they weren't before, but they SUPER DEFINITELY POSITIVELY aren't now. Trump saying Rosenstein said to fire Comey means any conversations they had on the subject of Comey are now totally unprotected and able to be asked about with no limitations. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted June 16, 2017 Share Posted June 16, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AsburySkinsFan Posted June 17, 2017 Share Posted June 17, 2017 On 6/15/2017 at 11:19 AM, visionary said: hmmm, ok Ok...what? Putin is trolling us all now. He's won this battle and created an amazing amount of instability and insecurity in the West, he's destabslized our government and through his actions he's got us so inwardly focused that we'd have a hard time stopping much of anything. Now he's just piling on. Gotta hand it to the guy, he's definitely redefined the shape and rules of the game. Does ANYONE....anyone at all believe that Trump is up to the task of seriously challenging Putin? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cooked Crack Posted June 17, 2017 Share Posted June 17, 2017 Trump has no intent whatsoever on challenging Putin. He'll continue to bow down and Republicans will look the other way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now