Hersh Posted November 18, 2016 Share Posted November 18, 2016 1 minute ago, No Excuses said: You can rule out Nikki Haley for any cabinet post: Wow. I'm speechless. Is there video of this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
No Excuses Posted November 18, 2016 Share Posted November 18, 2016 Just now, Hersh said: Wow. I'm speechless. Is there video of this? Not sure, may have just happened right now. But seriously, good for her and probably helps her chances in the future if Trump is the disaster that he projects to be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted November 18, 2016 Share Posted November 18, 2016 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AsburySkinsFan Posted November 18, 2016 Share Posted November 18, 2016 33 minutes ago, twa said: Neither is orders are orders Why can't you ever just look at a Republican and say, "Yeah, probably not the best choice there." Instead of constantly throwing shade on someone else in order to divert the examination of an obviously problematic nomination. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted November 18, 2016 Share Posted November 18, 2016 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
No Excuses Posted November 18, 2016 Share Posted November 18, 2016 I don't even know where to put this, but just gonna leave it here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FanboyOf91 Posted November 18, 2016 Share Posted November 18, 2016 Assange: Maybe now that I've helped Trump get elected, he'll get me off the hook. Trump: Ha, nope. Tool. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted November 18, 2016 Share Posted November 18, 2016 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twa Posted November 18, 2016 Share Posted November 18, 2016 6 minutes ago, AsburySkinsFan said: Why can't you ever just look at a Republican and say, "Yeah, probably not the best choice there." Instead of constantly throwing shade on someone else in order to divert the examination of an obviously problematic nomination. Flynn, Rience and Kelley good choices, Bannon and Sessions probably not the best choice....Happy? Examine all ya want, just not in a vacuum. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hersh Posted November 18, 2016 Share Posted November 18, 2016 2 minutes ago, twa said: Flynn, Rience and Kelley good choices, Bannon and Sessions probably not the best choice....Happy? Examine all ya want, just not in a vacuum. How is anyone examining in a vacuum? A candidate for a position is named and people are examining their records. What aspects are being overlooked and why shouldn't things they have said be problematic? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LD0506 Posted November 18, 2016 Share Posted November 18, 2016 15 minutes ago, AsburySkinsFan said: Why can't you ever just look at a Republican and say, "Yeah, probably not the best choice there." Instead of constantly throwing shade on someone else in order to divert the examination of an obviously problematic nomination. C'mon, you know why, don't be coy.............. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twa Posted November 18, 2016 Share Posted November 18, 2016 1 minute ago, Hersh said: How is anyone examining in a vacuum? A candidate for a position is named and people are examining their records. What aspects are being overlooked and why shouldn't things they have said be problematic? Some seem to object to looking beyond their objections......some obviously don't even know the record. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted November 18, 2016 Share Posted November 18, 2016 Someone is loving the picks so far! Guess who. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FanboyOf91 Posted November 18, 2016 Share Posted November 18, 2016 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AsburySkinsFan Posted November 18, 2016 Share Posted November 18, 2016 27 minutes ago, twa said: Flynn, Rience and Kelley good choices, Bannon and Sessions probably not the best choice....Happy? Examine all ya want, just not in a vacuum. Flynn is a good choice??? So his Russia ties don't bother you? oh wait nvmd Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fergasun Posted November 18, 2016 Share Posted November 18, 2016 For GOP, I think Sessions is a good choice for AG. It signals "tough on immigration" and he at least has some pretty decent experience in Federal Government. He is a far righter as well, so this signals strength on the anti-Muslim side as well. Trump is pretty much a "B" or "C" list politician, even if it is his."A" list celebrity status that got him elected. He needs to make sure he fills his cabinet with "A" or at least "B" list folks. Honestly, Romney, McCain, even some of the past Bush Admin folks, even some of the Obama people (Flournoy) would be solid "A" picks. Sessions, Haley.- they are "B" ---but he could have done worse. Treasury Sec will be very interesting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted November 18, 2016 Share Posted November 18, 2016 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FanboyOf91 Posted November 18, 2016 Share Posted November 18, 2016 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AsburySkinsFan Posted November 18, 2016 Share Posted November 18, 2016 Of course you would Mitch. Such a whore. He sunk Jim Bunning and opened the door to Rand Paul, he's refused to be anything other than a GOP party slut. He's bent over so many times I doubt he could ever stand up to anything. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted November 18, 2016 Share Posted November 18, 2016 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FanboyOf91 Posted November 18, 2016 Share Posted November 18, 2016 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weganator Posted November 18, 2016 Share Posted November 18, 2016 6 minutes ago, FanboyOf91 said: ugh why does the Libertarian party have to be such a joke, Republicans kill me on drug policy.. my only hope on that is that a 'conservative' will respect 'states rights' in respect to DC's recent ballot measure. Edit: Realized my comment assumed a ton of context on DC drug laws. Not that long ago, DC voted to make weed legal. Congress responded by not allowing DC to be able to fund dispensaries for legal distribution. It created this weird market where you aren't really allowed to sell it, but there is no punishment for having it. Basically this year has been a boon on drug dealers in that regard. DC recently passed a ballot measure that would appeal to congress to grant statehood. Likely won't happen, but hopefully it can be used to allow them to have slightly more respect / autonomy when it comes to other votes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted November 18, 2016 Share Posted November 18, 2016 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Riggo-toni Posted November 18, 2016 Share Posted November 18, 2016 1 hour ago, No Excuses said: I don't even know where to put this, but just gonna leave it here. Watch him pay for it out of his foundation. I mean, it's not like Sessions is gonna bust him for flagrantly breaking the law. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FanboyOf91 Posted November 18, 2016 Share Posted November 18, 2016 7 minutes ago, Riggo-toni said: Watch him pay for it out of his foundation. I mean, it's not like Sessions is gonna bust him for flagrantly breaking the law. And by 'his foundation', he'll mean 'the federal treasury'. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.