BleedBNG Posted December 22, 2015 Share Posted December 22, 2015 But for the Division title, don't we want to cheer for the Giants? If we beat the Eagles, we win the division. But if we don't, and the Giants win this week, the Giants would be playing for a possible Division title if the Redskins lost against Dallas right? Yes, Giants need to win their last 2 while we lose our last 2 for the Giants to win the division. Eagles win the last 2 and they're in. So, if we lose against the Eagles we want NY to lose against the Vikings, but beat Philly. And we need to beat the Cowboys. Whatever the OP wrote as the header, I'm sorry... NO WAY am I rooting against the Vikings whether we beat the Eagles or not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Califan007 The Constipated Posted December 28, 2015 Share Posted December 28, 2015 So is this thread still relevant?...Falcons win, Seahawks lose... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adamyesme1111 Posted December 28, 2015 Share Posted December 28, 2015 So, a bit confused on how this works. Assumed we were going to play the Seahawks. So the Sehawks ARE losing right now, and the falcons upset the Panthers. Minnesota plays tonight. How do we know who we are going to end up hosting and who we aren't? I would prefer the Vikings and Falcons over the Seahawks too I believe...as much as I would love to end Seattle's season for a change. Edit: Nevermind, doy...Went and looked at the playoff picture and realized we are the 4th seed so its just like any playoff system. I see. Haven't had to worry about it that much since the Redskins barely make the playoffs lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheGreek1973 Posted December 28, 2015 Share Posted December 28, 2015 Wow according to the tracker, we will not get to play the sea chickens the first game. We either get GB or the Vikings guys. Nope scratch that the sea chickens will need to lose to the cardinals. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hail2skins Posted December 28, 2015 Share Posted December 28, 2015 Wow according to the tracker, we will not get to play the sea chickens the first game. We either get GB or the Vikings guys. Still TBD, depending on who wins the NFCN and the record the second-place team has. Seattle has tiebreaker over Vikings; Packers have tiebreaker over Seattle. My question is regarding the schedule. Is there any chance the Tampa-Carolina game is flexed to 4 pm so that the two top seeds vying for HFA throughout are playing at the same time? Because if not and Carolina wins at 1, Arizona might just rest guys and make it easier for Seattle to win next week. I would imagine GB vs Minnesota gets flexed to SNF. Is that the only game that gets moved timewise next week? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adamyesme1111 Posted December 28, 2015 Share Posted December 28, 2015 Wow according to the tracker, we will not get to play the sea chickens the first game. We either get GB or the Vikings guys. Nope scratch that the sea chickens will need to lose to the cardinals. I would say that is likely to happen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hail2skins Posted December 28, 2015 Share Posted December 28, 2015 Also have to see what happens tonight. Today has been a strange day in the league and it wouldn't surprise me to see the Vikings lose to the ODB-less Giants. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheGreek1973 Posted December 28, 2015 Share Posted December 28, 2015 Still TBD, depending on who wins the NFCN and the record the second-place team has. Seattle has tiebreaker over Vikings; Packers have tiebreaker over Seattle. My question is regarding the schedule. Is there any chance the Tampa-Carolina game is flexed to 4 pm so that the two top seeds vying for HFA throughout are playing at the same time? Because if not and Carolina wins at 1, Arizona might just rest guys and make it easier for Seattle to win next week. I would imagine GB vs Minnesota gets flexed to SNF. Is that the only game that gets moved timewise next week? All good points, they should IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikeDinNYC Posted December 28, 2015 Share Posted December 28, 2015 tis weekend is awesome! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MisterPinstripe Posted December 28, 2015 Share Posted December 28, 2015 Yeah, I think it's likely we are not playing the Seahawks. I don't see them being able to beat the Cardinals. I think the Cardinals are the NFC team in the Super Bowl. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grego Posted December 28, 2015 Share Posted December 28, 2015 So, if the Seahawks lose to the cards, we play either minny or GB? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Califan007 The Constipated Posted December 28, 2015 Share Posted December 28, 2015 I don't know if I'm doing it correctly, but if the Seahawks lose next week against the Cardinals and the Falcons beat the Saints, the Seahawks are the #6 seed and won't go up against the Redskins, regardless of what the Packers and Vikings do? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaliSkinsFan92 Posted December 28, 2015 Share Posted December 28, 2015 I think the Skins end up getting the Vikings. I personally think the Vikes win tonight, lose next week and Seattle loses to Cards. If Arizona were to rest their starters it could be a totally different story though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thirtyfive2seven Posted December 28, 2015 Share Posted December 28, 2015 Updated: Redskins vs. Vikings Scenario: http://espn.go.com/nfl/playoffs/machine/_/results/400791565~1~400791651~2~400791683~1~400791689~1 Redskins vs. Seattle Scenario: http://espn.go.com/nfl/playoffs/machine/_/results/400791565~1~400791651~2~400791683~1~400791689~2 Redskins vs. Packers Scenario: http://espn.go.com/nfl/playoffs/machine/_/results/400791565~1~400791651~2~400791683~2~400791689~2 Alternate Packers Scenario: http://espn.go.com/nfl/playoffs/machine/_/results/400791565~2~400791651~2~400791683~2~400791689~2~400791610~1~400791614~2~400791659~2 Redskins vs. Falcons Scenario: http://espn.go.com/nfl/playoffs/machine/_/results/400791565~2~400791651~2~400791683~1~400791689~1~400791610~1~400791614~1 Alternate Falcons Scenario: http://espn.go.com/nfl/playoffs/machine/_/results/400791565~2~400791651~2~400791683~1~400791689~1~400791610~1~400791614~1~400791659~2 Redskins vs. Falcons isn't so crazy anymore. In fact, if you look at this scenario closely it seems likely based on today's results. Update: I forgot that the outcome of the Rams vs. SF game is in play here so scratch that if the Rams win (and likely will, the Falcons are out). Carolina beats the Bucs Cards beat the Seachickens Green Bay beats the Vikings Falcons beat the Saints Rams have to LOSE to the 49ers for any of this to matter so it's unlikely Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CurseReversed Posted December 28, 2015 Share Posted December 28, 2015 If someone wants the skins to play anybody but the Seahawks, who should they be cheering for tonight? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
justice98 Posted December 28, 2015 Share Posted December 28, 2015 Do the Cardinals need this game for anything or are they locked into the 2 spot? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zCommander Posted December 28, 2015 Share Posted December 28, 2015 As of right now we play the Vikings per NFL.com http://www.nfl.com/playoffs/playoff-picture Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoVaSkins21 Posted December 28, 2015 Share Posted December 28, 2015 If someone wants the skins to play anybody but the Seahawks, who should they be cheering for tonight? The Vikings. If they win, the Seahawks are locked out of the #5 seed no matter what happens next week. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skinsinparadise Posted December 28, 2015 Share Posted December 28, 2015 If someone wants the skins to play anybody but the Seahawks, who should they be cheering for tonight? That's easy. A Vikings win tonight would be huge. Arizona if I understand correctly could still lock up the #1 spot with a win and Carolina loss. And they are on deck for Seattle. If the Vikings win tonight regardless of what they do next next week -- and Seattle loses next week. No Seattle for us. If the Vikings lose tonight. We need them to beat GB in GB and hope Seattle loses -- that's a more difficult scenario. So Vikings winning tonight would go a long way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaliSkinsFan92 Posted December 28, 2015 Share Posted December 28, 2015 The Vikings. If they win, the Seahawks are locked out of the #5 seed no matter what happens next week. I'm not sure that's quite true at least according to what i've seen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skinsinparadise Posted December 28, 2015 Share Posted December 28, 2015 The Vikings. If they win, the Seahawks are locked out of the #5 seed no matter what happens next week. Not sure about that. Seattle has tie breaker over them so if Seattle wins next week and the Vikings lose, they'd have the same record and I believe Seattle wins it because of the head to head tie breaker. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoVaSkins21 Posted December 28, 2015 Share Posted December 28, 2015 I stand corrected. A Vikings win doesn't necessarily lock Seattle out of the #5 spot, but it does help. I guess I didn't do enough simulations. That said, the Skins shouldn't be scared of the Seahawks. They're good but not great. They just lost again at home and their OL isn't the best. Plus there's the revenge factor as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sportjunkie07 Posted December 28, 2015 Share Posted December 28, 2015 So with the Seattle loss tonight we most likely play the vikings, then the cards, then the winner of Carolina/xx That's a good setup imo. Would love it to be vikings/cards/Seahawks (for revenge) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pico926 Posted December 28, 2015 Share Posted December 28, 2015 Collinsworth is so uninformed. ON MNF claims rookie Hunter leads all rookies with 6 sacks. Wrong Preston Smith has 7. If your going to boldly throw out stats you need to be correct! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoVaSkins21 Posted December 28, 2015 Share Posted December 28, 2015 Collinsworth is so uninformed. ON MNF claims rookie Hunter leads all rookies with 6 sacks. Wrong Preston Smith has 7. If your going to boldly throw out stats you need to be correct! Collinsworth is Joe Buck light. He likes to makes statements to get a reaction from his buddy Al. They both have googly eyes for teams like the Patriots and Dal@ss. Not as unbearable as Buck, but still annoying. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.