Skinsinparadise Posted September 7, 2011 Share Posted September 7, 2011 The NY Post dissing Rex and the Redskins offense as soft. http://www.nypost.com/p/sports/giants/gilbride_must_give_jacobs_bradshaw_kj1KpF2BgtpwWRLlvy0yHN Joke’s on Grossman THIS won’t be coming out of the mouths of any of the Giants defenders tomorrow when they start talking about the Redskins, but they couldn’t have ordered up a softer attack to face in the opener. Not sure what the joke is, but when the punch line is “Rex Grossman,” you know it’s got to be funny. Grossman, 31, enters his ninth NFL season having beaten out John Beck for the Redskins starting quarterback job after a summer-long competition that excited no one outside of the Beltway and, most likely, not many within. Skins coach Mike Shanahan said he “thought Rex won by an edge,” but what is the hope for a team when a lackluster performer such as Grossman is deemed the best option? Sure, he started 16 games in 2006 and the Bears made it to the Super Bowl, but Grossman (40 career touchdown passes, 40 career interceptions) should be a backup. He started three games last season after Shanahan benched Donovan McNabb, continuing a revolving door policy at quarterback that has spun the Redskins dizzy. They have used 20 different starting quarterbacks in the last 18 seasons. Not surprisingly, there have been only five winning seasons in that span. The Redskins are an overwhelming choice to finish last in the NFC East this season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SonnyRules Posted September 7, 2011 Share Posted September 7, 2011 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
charlton Posted September 7, 2011 Share Posted September 7, 2011 Wow- I don't get this. With all the injuries the Giants have coming into this game and the Skins are still listed as 3 point underdogs at home. I mean come on- the Giants are going to be forced to start a rookie 6th rounder at LB this weekend, not to mention all the other players missing on defense. I'm surprised this spread isn't closer to even. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Teller Posted September 7, 2011 Share Posted September 7, 2011 You guys missed it, this is easy, he is going to say Antonio Peirce. It is obvious the way he ripped off the Giants players, Peirce is his favorite Redskin. It's Pierce. A REAL Skins fan would know that! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darth Tater Posted September 7, 2011 Share Posted September 7, 2011 I want to go all 1979 on the Giants. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkinsFTW Posted September 7, 2011 Share Posted September 7, 2011 Wow- I don't get this. With all the injuries the Giants have coming into this game and the Skins are still listed as 3 point underdogs at home. I mean come on- the Giants are going to be forced to start a rookie 6th rounder at LB this weekend, not to mention all the other players missing on defense. I'm surprised this spread isn't closer to even. Actually it would seem that the Redskins would be favored by 4-7. At home. The giants have lost their top possession receiver, starting te, and are starting 2 new on the OL including the LT, and we have their stud DT starting for us now. 1/2 their starting defense is out as well. Meanwhile we've added Hightower, Helu, Kerrigan, and only will be without Landry. Oh and Shanahan is 17-1 alltime in openers. This is from a Giants websiteL: "Cornerback Terrell Thomas, who had five interceptions and four forced fumbles last season, tore an ACL and is out for the year. Cornerback Prince Amukamara, a first-round pick, fractured a bone in his left foot, and backup cornerback Bruce Johnson tore his Achilles'. Cornerback Brian Witherspoon(torn ACL), linebacker Johnathan Goff (torn ACL) and defensive tackle Marvin Austin (torn pectoral muscle) are out for the year, and defensive end Osi Umenyiora had knee surgery" Oh and Justin Tuck hasn't practiced and Coughlin is saying he is now doubtful to play. "Justin Tuck (neck) was limited in practice on Wednesday. Tom Coughlin didn't think he'd be able to go at all. CB Prince Amukamara (foot), LB Jonathan Goff (knee) and DE Osi Umenyiora (knee) all sat out of practice and will be out Sunday against Washington. Goff was lost for the season on Tuesday with a torn ACL" http://espn.go.com/blog/new-york/giants/post/_/id/6691/giants-wednesday-injury-report Yeah, I think I'd be betting on the Giants, right. I know its still any given sunday but the odds are heavily stacked in our favor, Landry playing or not. Their DB's were already swiss cheese and with a few of them out and their 3 best DL either out, or on our team now Grossman better blow them up early and often. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MdMack21 Posted September 7, 2011 Share Posted September 7, 2011 The Giants are all beat up with injuries and have some turmoil within the team. On the other hand we seem to be together as a unit and playing with confidence. After looking at some film of The Sex Cannon vs the Pukes and Giants last year, I feel he can do a good job. We are at home and need to start bringing a winning tradition to FedEx. We should win this game on Sunday. Tired of being pushed over, its time to push back. #Hail Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skinzplay Posted September 7, 2011 Share Posted September 7, 2011 The Giants have lots of injuries, it's true......but that's a team that scouts and drafts very, very well. Usually when a starter goes down, the replacement steps in and begins to make a name for himself. Let's not get too giddy about their injuries; let's just hope that our boys play their game and do what they're supposed to do. HTTR! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redskins684 Posted September 8, 2011 Share Posted September 8, 2011 I agree with skinzplay on that one, finally someone is worried as I am. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skinsinparadise Posted September 8, 2011 Share Posted September 8, 2011 Hope the skins players catch this article http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/football-insider/post/justin-tuck-giants-have-redskins-number/2011/09/07/gIQAvwQ1AK_blog.html#pagebreak New York Giants defensive end Justin Tuck believes his team has the Redskins’ number, and that facing Rex Grossman, whom the Giants played against in the 2010 finale, should only help. “We just have your number right now,” Tuck told Redskins beat writers during a conference call Wednesday when broached with the subject of the Giants’ 9-1 record against the Redskins in their last 10 meetings. “I hope that continues, but I definitely see the Redskins as a team on the rise and you can see they’re hungry to get back to the prominence of old-time Redskins football. Hopefully we can continue to do that, but right now I feel like we have [their number] kinda like how Philly has ours.” Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkinsFTW Posted September 8, 2011 Share Posted September 8, 2011 Thats all nice but Tuck might not even play and that would be even better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
S.T.real,lights,out Posted September 8, 2011 Share Posted September 8, 2011 Ive never seen that espy..that was too funny! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
authentic Posted September 8, 2011 Share Posted September 8, 2011 Thats all nice but Tuck might not even play and that would be even better. @MikeGarafolo: DE Justin Tuck (neck) appears to be sitting out today after today after being limited yesterday. #nyg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warhead36 Posted September 8, 2011 Share Posted September 8, 2011 Hope the skins players catch this articlehttp://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/football-insider/post/justin-tuck-giants-have-redskins-number/2011/09/07/gIQAvwQ1AK_blog.html#pagebreak New York Giants defensive end Justin Tuck believes his team has the Redskins’ number, and that facing Rex Grossman, whom the Giants played against in the 2010 finale, should only help. “We just have your number right now,” Tuck told Redskins beat writers during a conference call Wednesday when broached with the subject of the Giants’ 9-1 record against the Redskins in their last 10 meetings. “I hope that continues, but I definitely see the Redskins as a team on the rise and you can see they’re hungry to get back to the prominence of old-time Redskins football. Hopefully we can continue to do that, but right now I feel like we have [their number] kinda like how Philly has ours.” I don't really see anything wrong with what he said. They do have our number but he also gave us a lot of respect. I don't care if the Giants are putting out a bunch of high school JV players. Until we beat them they own us and NOTHING is guaranteed. If anything these injuries have me more nervous because it's games like this in the past where randon no names have come up and made a name against us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skinsinparadise Posted September 8, 2011 Share Posted September 8, 2011 I don't really see anything wrong with what he said. They do have our number but he also gave us a lot of respect. I don't care if the Giants are putting out a bunch of high school JV players. Until we beat them they own us and NOTHING is guaranteed. If anything these injuries have me more nervous because it's games like this in the past where randon no names have come up and made a name against us. Tuck can say this I agree and agree its actually true. However, like most of us, I read whatever I can get my hands on each season before a game -- and yeah its rare for a player to PUBLICLY say they have the opponent's number. It would get me fired up but who knows. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sportjunkie07 Posted September 8, 2011 Share Posted September 8, 2011 Tuck is imo, going to be the biggest problem for us. i think he'll play, but if he doesnt, i think its gonna be a rout. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tweedr01 Posted September 8, 2011 Share Posted September 8, 2011 This is quite opposite to our usual Karma threads here. and those haven't been working, time to go positive! skins w 27-13 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC9 Posted September 8, 2011 Share Posted September 8, 2011 and those haven't been working, time to go positive!skins w 27-13 I'm a realist, but it's amazing how many of us (yes, me included) have the Redskins by more than one score and going into the upper 20's. I can't wait... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JBGrams Posted September 8, 2011 Share Posted September 8, 2011 We the faithful of Redskins Nation are due, it's our turn! We will kick the **** out of the Giants, they are first in what should be a long line of **** kicking this season. HTTR! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheShredder Posted September 8, 2011 Share Posted September 8, 2011 I don't like the history, but as important as the past is...it's never as important as how you view your future! The 2011 Redskins view their future as a winning team and have played well together thus far. Past history cannot predict future results in a league that changes so much from year to year. The result of the recent past with the Giants have been because of the wrong attitude and philosophy previously employed. That's over. I wouldn't be putting any money on the Giants this weekend, but if you do, it's your own fault. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SonnyRules Posted September 8, 2011 Share Posted September 8, 2011 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Riggo#44 Posted September 8, 2011 Share Posted September 8, 2011 The Giants have our number until proven otherwise.17-14 Gmen. I was thinking the same thing. The Giants have owned us. Owned. Until we acutally do it, anyone predicting a blowout is getting a little too high on the horse here. I see a 20-17 type game, where the Giants have a 35:00-25:00 TOP advantage. We still haven't proven we can stop Jacobs, Bradshaw, Nicks or Manningham. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
S.T.real,lights,out Posted September 8, 2011 Share Posted September 8, 2011 I was thinking the same thing. The Giants have owned us. Owned. Until we acutally do it, anyone predicting a blowout is getting a little too high on the horse here.I see a 20-17 type game, where the Giants have a 35:00-25:00 TOP advantage. We still haven't proven we can stop Jacobs, Bradshaw, Nicks or Manningham. I hate seeing them run for 5-6 yards at a time. There is no way we can win if they do this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redskins684 Posted September 8, 2011 Share Posted September 8, 2011 I agree with Riggo said, if giants run ball well and control Time of Possession we could be in trouble. That's why Grossman has to be on his A game if Giants control clock. Get as many scoring drives as we can! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DieselPwr44 Posted September 11, 2011 Share Posted September 11, 2011 Bump for game day. Today, this nonsense of "they got our number" stops today. We'll give em a number: 1 in the loss column. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.