What do some of you not understand?

[iheartskins]

Blade's on family and career leave. All good things, I assure you.

He sends his best.

T is definitely the original &*^%^&*, oh, and the original %%^&*()) as well.

[GhostofAlvinWalton]

It's pretty pathetic isn't it? I read the first 5 pages and saw where this was heading and just shook my head in disbelief.

So many loyalist to a total jerkoff. I've been reading this board for years and one day decided to join. Since then, the leadership here has gone to the crapper and many of the top admins/mods have turned into complete *******s.

Everytime I come here and read a thread like this is pisses me off. This place use to be great. Now there's just a bunch of jerks running the show.

Just for the record, I've been an ******* since before you joined. But lucky you, this jerk running the show can relieve you of coming here & getting pissed off.

The ironing is delicious!

.

[KingGibbs]

Blade's on family and career leave. All good things, I assure you.

He sends his best.

T is definitely the original &*^%^&*, oh, and the original %%^&*()) as well.

Good ol' iheart. I can't believe I forgot you my man. Iheart iheart.

[iheartskins]

Good ol' iheart. I can't believe I forgot you my man. Iheart iheart.

No worries KG. I'm under the radar these days. Going the way of Blade with work and family, too.

[Monte51Coleman]

Blade has moved & been making Mini-Blades. Be on the lookout for a new user by the name of SwitchBlade.

So...he's been working as a doctor and playing doctor!

[Isifhan]

I've been reading this board for years and one day decided to join. Since then, the leadership here has gone to the crapper and many of the top admins/mods have turned into complete *******s.

Coincidence? We may never know.....

[@DCGoldPants]

Can you feel the love?

[HailSkinz1]

People here who are just set on being argumentive are refusing to even acknowledge the fact that Art has repeatedly stated that he has banned no one.

Although when you posted this, Art had banned someone. And let's not pretend that everyone reads every post in every thread, okay. So someone didn't read Art's new rule and he gets reprimanded.

Someone asked for a recap, so....

MRMADD - Read Only status for apparently breaking a promise to Art. For more information, this nugget was posted earlier in this thread: http://www.extremeskins.com/forums/showpost.php?p=3717755&postcount=156

Hooper - Hooper was put on Read Only status for saying incorrectly that MRMADD was banned, when MRMADD was really only "Read Only'd." http://www.extremeskins.com/forums/showpost.php?p=3717848&postcount=170

I cannot find the rule that states such statements would result in a reprimand, but I did find these rules:

http://www.extremeskins.com/forums/showpost.php?p=3717830&postcount=165

Anyone who says either of the following is banned.

1. That Dan Snyder is making the final decisions.

2. That saying Joe Gibbs is making the final decisions means that person is saying Dan Snyder is not involved in any way.

Now, if you right now say, "But Snyder is involved," I'll say, "Yep, he is, we know," and ban you, because no one has ever said otherwise. We've said he's not the ultimate decision maker and his role is clearly defined by every member of the org.

Monkforhall - it's not clear why monkforhall was banned, but it seems that it might have something to do with monkforhall telling a friend about Art's new rule. http://www.extremeskins.com/forums/showpost.php?p=3718172&postcount=212

Man, Snyder's decision making is a real sensitive subject. I just told a friend that people would be banned on extremeskins if they said that Snyder made the final decisions again. LOL. That sounds pretty hilarious. This has been quite an entertaining thread. Looks like it's going back to normal now. X's and O's. Stats, blah.

No it doesn't. But, thanks for playing. Now it looks like someone WAS banned for not reading that no one here has been banned, though, the option is available to any who'd like.

My hope is Monk's two day ban leads to a number of folks who want to go for more .

Beer is Food - Beer violated the "Do not say someone is banned when they are not banned" rule. It took poor Beer only one post. http://www.extremeskins.com/forums/showpost.php?p=3718259&postcount=217

panthro - panthro requested to be banned and Art was kind enough to oblige.

http://www.extremeskins.com/forums/showpost.php?p=3718623&postcount=245

Can we rename this "The Body Bag" thread?

Hail,

H

[Monte51Coleman]

Can we rename this "The Body Bag" thread?

Hail,

H

Not so quick. There just might be one more coming. :laugh:

[skinsn24]

Although when you posted this, Art had banned someone. And let's not pretend that everyone reads every post in every thread, okay. So someone didn't read Art's new rule and he gets reprimanded.

Someone asked for a recap, so....

MRMADD - Read Only status for apparently breaking a promise to Art. For more information, this nugget was posted earlier in this thread: http://www.extremeskins.com/forums/showpost.php?p=3717755&postcount=156

Hooper - Hooper was put on Read Only status for saying incorrectly that MRMADD was banned, when MRMADD was really only "Read Only'd." http://www.extremeskins.com/forums/showpost.php?p=3717848&postcount=170

I cannot find the rule that states such statements would result in a reprimand, but I did find these rules:

http://www.extremeskins.com/forums/showpost.php?p=3717830&postcount=165

Monkforhall - it's not clear why monkforhall was banned, but it seems that it might have something to do with monkforhall telling a friend about Art's new rule. http://www.extremeskins.com/forums/showpost.php?p=3718172&postcount=212

Beer is Food - Beer violated the "Do not say someone is banned when they are not banned" rule. It took poor Beer only one post. http://www.extremeskins.com/forums/showpost.php?p=3718259&postcount=217

panthro - panthro requested to be banned and Art was kind enough to oblige.

http://www.extremeskins.com/forums/showpost.php?p=3718623&postcount=245

Can we rename this "The Body Bag" thread?

Hail,

H

This was a great post and really summed things up. Can someone explain the difference between banned and read only, because i know when either one happens, you cannot post.

I also know that a ban is not forever because as art said monk got a 2 day ban.

[Art]

Hail,

Monk was banned so I could open the door to banning others more worthy. He's already back on board and helped out immensely. I've already thanked him .

[illone]

This thread made some interesting turns.

:laugh:

[TK]

Can someone explain the difference between banned and read only, because i know when either one happens, you cannot post.

It's easier to understand if you experience the effects of each.

[JoeGibbsThickandthin]

The problem is you mods said he was not involved in football operations at all. Now you are saying he does not make the final decesion.

So it creates confusion. He is involved. But Joe Gibbs has the over ruling power. But there is no one making the decesion since its a redskins group grade.

[Art]

The problem is you mods said he was not involved in football operations at all. Now you are saying he does not make the final decesion.

So it creates confusion. He is involved. But Joe Gibbs has the over ruling power. But there is no one making the decesion since its a redskins group grade.

No, none of the mods said he was not involved in the football operations at all. I've repeatedly outlined how he is involved in the operations and made a case the involvement he's had is good. Too bad you've chosen to ignore it.

[illone]

This thread reminds me of the April fools gag a few years ago.

[Dan T.]

And another one bites the dust. Poke. Poke. Poke.

[TK]

I cannot find the rule that states such statements would result in a reprimand, but I did find these rules:

Did you look at that pesky last one?

18. Adhere to the advice and recommendations of the ExtremeSkins.com Staff.

[Art]

And another one bites the dust. Poke. Poke. Poke.

I'm dying to ban you. Come on. Let me .

Fortunately, we're easy marks here. We'll allow anyone back the instant they ask . So, again, art @ extremeskins.com is the starting point. And, ok, maybe NOT the INSTANT .

[Dan T.]

I'm dying to ban you. Come on. Let me .

Fortunately, we're easy marks here. We'll allow anyone back the instant they ask . So, again, art @ extremeskins.com is the starting point. And, ok, maybe NOT the INSTANT .

Art, I'm not involved in banning decisions. I may offer input into the process, but you have the final decisionmaking authority.

[Art]

Art, I'm not involved in banning decisions. I may offer input into the process, but you make the final decisionmaking authority.

That IS funny. But, unfortunately, I already used it ON Madd, telling him HE was the decision maker, I'm just part of the process . THAT was even funnier.

[Dan T.]

That IS funny. But, unfortunately, I already used it ON Madd, telling him HE was the decision maker, I'm just part of the process . THAT was even funnier.

So in this thread you've accused me of being both a liar AND a thief. :laugh: I usually don't lie, and I rarely steal other's comedy.

[flexxskins]

Although when you posted this, Art had banned someone. And let's not pretend that everyone reads every post in every thread, okay. So someone didn't read Art's new rule and he gets reprimanded.

At the time when I had posted my quote, I was referring to the people who were inquiring about Madd being banned, over and over again.

There are a few people here who are now just being argumentive and just plain petty.

[skinfan2k]

are people really get banned? whoa...

[project myu]

I'd like to say that I appreciate the work Henry and Blade have done for this forum. Both are very helpful, polite, and like the best referees in sports, their actual "officiating" goes unnoticed.