visionary Posted September 24, 2016 Share Posted September 24, 2016 How is the Trump campaign still doing this? lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted September 24, 2016 Share Posted September 24, 2016 What? Why? I give up. Earlier: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TradeTheBeal! Posted September 24, 2016 Share Posted September 24, 2016 Was Paula Jones not available? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LadySkinsFan Posted September 24, 2016 Share Posted September 24, 2016 I would guess that Ivana and Marla could have some interesting things to say, but they probably have a confidentiality clause in their divorce papers. Maybe we could get the ghost author of his "autobiography". /sarcasm off This is getting out of hand. Why isn't the Trump campaign being investigated for contributions from foreign individuals and such? Why isn't the campaign being investigated for soliciting contributions from foreign nationals and such? The Congress needs to pass more stringent campaign contribution laws with jail time attached. Personally, I think the appearance of Gennifer Flowers wouldn't phase Clinton in the least. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hersh Posted September 24, 2016 Share Posted September 24, 2016 I hope she is there and I hope Hillary is smart enough to destroy Trump with it: "My opponent is so thin-skinned that when he found out Mark Cuban was going to be here, he decided to invite someone in an attempt to get under my skin. That is the difference between us. He is easily provoked by the tiniest of things (extend pinky) and it doesn't bother me because I have important issues to focus on." (Face Trump and wave the pinky at him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sacks 'n' Stuff Posted September 24, 2016 Share Posted September 24, 2016 What a disgrace. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twa Posted September 24, 2016 Share Posted September 24, 2016 2 hours ago, Sacks 'n' Stuff said: What a disgrace. that she removed a pledge to believe all sexual assault victims when it became inconvenient? http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3741760/Hillary-Clinton-s-website-removed-promise-believe-sexual-assault-survivors-emergence-Bill-Clinton-Juanita-Broaddrick-historic-rape-allegations.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hail2skins Posted September 24, 2016 Share Posted September 24, 2016 Same PA poll which had Hillary up 8 a couple weeks ago now has her up only 2. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-9- Posted September 24, 2016 Share Posted September 24, 2016 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BornaSkinsFan83 Posted September 25, 2016 Share Posted September 25, 2016 Desperate times call for desperate measures Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
No Excuses Posted September 25, 2016 Share Posted September 25, 2016 19 minutes ago, hail2skins said: Same PA poll which had Hillary up 8 a couple weeks ago now has her up only 2. Had her up +8 a week ago which likely means this is a volatile jump. Gary Johnson also dropped -6 in this one and Trump gained all of that margin. Too many recent polls in PA shown big enough margins that this is likely an oddity. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DogofWar1 Posted September 25, 2016 Share Posted September 25, 2016 12 minutes ago, No Excuses said: Had her up +8 a week ago which likely means this is a volatile jump. Gary Johnson also dropped -6 in this one and Trump gained all of that margin. Too many recent polls in PA shown big enough margins that this is likely an oddity. Polls bounce around. I especially liked 538's article about how different pollsters got fairly different results from the same data based on different weighing and the like. http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/09/20/upshot/the-error-the-polling-world-rarely-talks-about.html?_r=0 Ultimately, this is why 538's setup is so good. They understand that individual polls have pretty sizable possible ranges and that margins of error tend to underestimate the possible wobble. This isn't to say PA isn't getting closer, but 6 points in a week, against the recent slight trendline shift back towards Clinton? Probably a little off the actual numbers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted September 25, 2016 Share Posted September 25, 2016 Meaning his head is stuck up Trump's ass. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larry Posted September 25, 2016 Share Posted September 25, 2016 1 minute ago, visionary said: Meaning his head is stuck up Trump's ass. I would interpret it as "Knows that if he appears, that's going to be what they hammer him with." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted September 25, 2016 Share Posted September 25, 2016 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twa Posted September 25, 2016 Share Posted September 25, 2016 55 minutes ago, visionary said: Meaning his head is stuck up Trump's ass. His Tribune interview didn't come across like that. were the logistical issues on the Meet the press side? have a another sip Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
clskinsfan Posted September 25, 2016 Share Posted September 25, 2016 7 hours ago, AJ* said: I wouldn't be surprised if it were true. GWB was an idiot but he didn't seem like a man that lacked empathy which is why I think his decisions are going to haunt him all the way to his grave. I like to think he was the kind of man that could be easily manipulated into rushing into war by heartless neocons instead of actually being a neocon himself. Rushing into war? War was inevitible once 3000 Americans were killed in an attack on our country. Give me a break. 6 hours ago, TryTheBeal! said: Was Paula Jones not available? Is Monica Lewinsky or Gennifer Flowers? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sacks 'n' Stuff Posted September 25, 2016 Share Posted September 25, 2016 15 minutes ago, clskinsfan said: Rushing into war? War was inevitible once 3000 Americans were killed in an attack on our country. Give me a break. Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11. edit: and I feel like enough time has past from GWB's nice showing today to fairly criticize him for being one of the worst presidents in U.S. history. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BornaSkinsFan83 Posted September 25, 2016 Share Posted September 25, 2016 18 minutes ago, Sacks 'n' Stuff said: Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11. Then why did Obummer attack them!!! BTW, the point of me praising W earlier was that he was indeed arguably (very arguably) the worst president ever and Trump actually has me missing him. So don't get it twisted. It's backhanded praise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LadySkinsFan Posted September 25, 2016 Share Posted September 25, 2016 Kennerly's photo of Bush 43 and FLOTUS hugging him almost makes him appear human. I'm sure he's greatly relieved not to be President anymore, so he can paint and whatever else he does. I think he's rather benign now. But not back in 2001 and so on. His cluelessness and inattention directly lead to 9-11. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TradeTheBeal! Posted September 25, 2016 Share Posted September 25, 2016 51 minutes ago, clskinsfan said: Rushing into war? War was inevitible once 3000 Americans were killed in an attack on our country. Give me a break. Is Monica Lewinsky or Gennifer Flowers? Was it over when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor?!? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sacks 'n' Stuff Posted September 25, 2016 Share Posted September 25, 2016 1 hour ago, BornaSkinsFan83 said: BTW, the point of me praising W earlier was that he was indeed arguably (very arguably) the worst president ever and Trump actually has me missing him. So don't get it twisted. It's backhanded praise. I wasn't ragging on you or any of the other 10 posts about W. What everyone was saying is probably true. He's sweet but dopey. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mistertim Posted September 25, 2016 Share Posted September 25, 2016 2 hours ago, clskinsfan said: Rushing into war? War was inevitible once 3000 Americans were killed in an attack on our country. Give me a break. 2003 called, it wants its right wing talking point back. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Sisko Posted September 25, 2016 Share Posted September 25, 2016 2 hours ago, twa said: His Tribune interview didn't come across like that. were the logistical issues on the Meet the press side? have a another sip Uh yeah. Good luck with that. Don't choke on that Kool Aid. They put a LOT of sugar in it to get you all to swallow it. "Lyin" Ted now has a middle name - "Lyin Turnabout Ted". He's got all the backbone of a bowl of Jello Puddin'. OTOH he might just show up tomorrow and say he lied - which, come to think of it would be a pretty hilarious way to poke Drumpf. ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larry Posted September 25, 2016 Share Posted September 25, 2016 7 hours ago, clskinsfan said: Rushing into war? War was inevitible once 3000 Americans were killed in an attack on our country. Give me a break. I confess, I'm having trouble figuring out if you're really trying to say something as incredibly stupid as what I think you're saying. It LOOKS, to me, like you're saying "the Bush administration has no blame whatsoever for intentionally using a national tragedy as a tool to manipulate the country into launching two simultaneous land wars in Asia, which they wanted to launch, anyway. Because hey, it was time to invade somebody, anyway". But im not certain that my opinion of you is low enough to imagine you being THAT stupid. So, I'm going to actually ASK you whether I'm reading you correctly. 7 hours ago, LadySkinsFan said: Kennerly's photo of Bush 43 and FLOTUS hugging him almost makes him appear human. I'm sure he's greatly relieved not to be President anymore, so he can paint and whatever else he does. I think he's rather benign now. But not back in 2001 and so on. His cluelessness and inattention directly lead to 9-11. You had me up till that last sentence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.