rumplestilskin Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 1 minute ago, Ball Security said: Thought this guy was going to be a stud when he was at Clemson. Wasn't he a Mike Mayock favorite? 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warhead36 Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 Needed two new DEs. Got em. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JamesMadisonSkins Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 Ferrrell is a depth/reclamation piece. Totally fine with the signing. But this actually gets us in a position to not be desperate for DE in the draft. My guess is we'll grab someone who is BPA in the 3rd/4th round range for the long-term. But Ferrell and Armstrong + Henry and Jones, Jr. give us a compelling 4 man rotation at least. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CommDownMan Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 (edited) Didn't remember the name, so went looking. Interesting option. https://www.sfchronicle.com/sports/49ers/article/49ers-free-agents-clelin-ferrell-stay-chase-18707549.php Keepers DE Clelin Ferrell What’s the old line? You don’t know what you’ve got until he’s gone because of a season-ending knee injury. After Ferrell started and finished the first 16 regular-season games, collecting 3.5 sacks and playing largely in the shadows, his immense value as a run defender became evident after he was injured in the Week 18 finale against the Rams. Here’s some offseason advice to help 49ers solve their roster problems Without Ferrell, the run defense went from stingy to stunningly bad. In the regular season, the 49ers allowed 89.7 rushing yards per game (third in the NFL) and 4.1 yards per carry (10th). In three playoff games: 149.3 yards per game and 5.1 yards per carry, figures that would have both ranked last in the NFL in the regular season. Ferrell, the No. 4 pick in 2019 by the Raiders, has failed to meet draft-day expectations in his 13.5-sack career. But he’s elite when it comes to setting the edge, NFL lingo for a defensive end or linebacker’s ability to not allow running backs to get outside of them. It’s gritty and unglamorous work for a pass rusher, and Ferrell’s primary playoff replacements, Young and Randy Gregory, weren’t up to the task. “Clelin brought probably the best effort of anybody on the team,” pass rusher Nick Bosa said when asked about Ferrell’s absence during the playoffs. The 49ers should make a strong effort to bring back Ferrell. It’s a relatively low-cost move — he counted $2.46 million against the salary cap last year — that could pay big dividends. Edited March 12 by CommDownMan 12 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chump Bailey Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 Calvin Ridley is someone I'd be interested in taking a look at even with a strong WR class. Ridley and Terry would seem like a potent dual threat. 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skinsinparadise Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 That’s true another locker room leader type 7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FrFan Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 18 minutes ago, Riggo#44 said: Players, coaches, executives want to come here. 4 12 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JamesMadisonSkins Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 Fun watching this team build come together. The FO is approaching FA exactly as I had expected/hoped. Build through the draft, add quality pieces in FA, but don't overpay. Ferrell will help set the edge against the rush, Armstrong will be looked to get to the passer, and Luvu will be a do-it-all backer who can blitz. None are breaking the bank. Defensive front already completely re-made. 9 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KillBill26 Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 Love the Ferrell signing! Poor mans Greenard. Solid against the run, should be able to get to the QB at times with that d line. Cheap, low risk move. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alaroche04 Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 I'm watching a Panthers podcast and they are livid about losing Luvu. 5 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RWJ Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 6 minutes ago, CommDownMan said: Didn't remember the name, so went looking. Interesting option. https://www.sfchronicle.com/sports/49ers/article/49ers-free-agents-clelin-ferrell-stay-chase-18707549.php Keepers DE Clelin Ferrell What’s the old line? You don’t know what you’ve got until he’s gone because of a season-ending knee injury. After Ferrell started and finished the first 16 regular-season games, collecting 3.5 sacks and playing largely in the shadows, his immense value as a run defender became evident after he was injured in the Week 18 finale against the Rams. Here’s some offseason advice to help 49ers solve their roster problems Without Ferrell, the run defense went from stingy to stunningly bad. In the regular season, the 49ers allowed 89.7 rushing yards per game (third in the NFL) and 4.1 yards per carry (10th). In three playoff games: 149.3 yards per game and 5.1 yards per carry, figures that would have both ranked last in the NFL in the regular season. Ferrell, the No. 4 pick in 2019 by the Raiders, has failed to meet draft-day expectations in his 13.5-sack career. But he’s elite when it comes to setting the edge, NFL lingo for a defensive end or linebacker’s ability to not allow running backs to get outside of them. It’s gritty and unglamorous work for a pass rusher, and Ferrell’s primary playoff replacements, Young and Randy Gregory, weren’t up to the task. “Clelin brought probably the best effort of anybody on the team,” pass rusher Nick Bosa said when asked about Ferrell’s absence during the playoffs. The 49ers should make a strong effort to bring back Ferrell. It’s a relatively low-cost move — he counted $2.46 million against the salary cap last year — that could pay big dividends. Good info, CDM. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThatNFLChick Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 6 minutes ago, Chump Bailey said: Calvin Ridley is someone I'd be interested in taking a look at even with a strong WR class. Ridley and Terry would seem like a potent dual threat. Ridley seems to be the Patriots top target (but the Jags are trying to keep him) 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KillBill26 Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 I saw an article from SF chronicle recommending the 9ers retain Ferrell and let chase walk. I enjoyed seeing that. (Can't copy and paste, have to sign up to access entire article) 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skinny21 Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 17 minutes ago, JamesMadisonSkins said: OTC has the Armstrong, Ekeler and Allegretti deals on the books. Cap hits ('24, '25, '26) Armstrong:$4.9m - $9.8m - $12.3m Allegretti:$3.6m, $4.5m, $8m Ekeler: $3.2m, $5.1m, ---- If Armstrong's hit is $4.9m in 2024, I would expect Luvu to be in the range of $5-6m. We know McManus is $3.5m. Ertz around $3m, Biadiasz is probably around $5m as well. Armstrong: $4.9m Biadiasz: $5m Luvu: $6m Allegretti: $3.6m Ekeler: $3.2m Ertz: $3m McManus: $3.5m Total: $29.2m We've got about $60m remaining. Less our draft capital, that's still $46m to spend. And that can go a LONG way with how these are structured. 10ish mil for rookie class, and I’m guessing they’ll wanna hold onto 20+mil for in-season moves and to roll into next year. Maybe earmark some money for a Cosmi extension? Still gives them 30 or so to play around with. OT, possibly/likely a swing OT, safety and corner left to sign. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FootballZombie Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 I'll take every Edge coming our way, we need em all. Also not against a cheap reclamation project. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warhead36 Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 I look at it like we traded Young for Ferrell and got a draft pick out of it. Not bad at all. 10 1 2 5 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JamesMadisonSkins Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 1 minute ago, skinny21 said: 10ish mil for rookie class, and I’m guessing they’ll wanna hold onto 20+mil for in-season moves and to roll into next year. Maybe earmark some money for a Cosmi extension? Still gives them 30 or so to play around with. OT, possibly/likely a swing OT, safety and corner left to sign. Yep, it's $10m for the Top 51, I think about $14.5m for the total allocation. I agree ... think we'll carry over quite a bit of $$. What I expect rest of this primary FA cycle: Offensive Tackle - spend $$ here, is my guess Cornerback - reclamation project would be my guess (1-2 year deal) Safety - Stopgap type (Kearse) Linebacker - 1 year deal, smaller contract, primarily depth Offensive Tackle - 1 year deal, swing tackle 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skinny21 Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 Just now, FootballZombie said: I'll take every Edge coming our way, we need em all. Also not against a cheap reclamation project. Not against calling him a reclamation project, but I’m reminded of Quinn/Whitt talking about finding what guys do well and using them to their strengths. Ferrell’s gonna be setting some edges in the run game for sure. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Twelfth man Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 Most nervous that they're going to keep Wylie at RT but in Peters I trust. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rumplestilskin Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 Tee Higgins may force a trade so although a long shot my fingers are crossed. A trade for him or Snead would be our signature FA move. A boy can dream. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sebestian Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 14 minutes ago, rumplestilskin said: Wasn't he a Mike Mayock favorite? First thing I thought of. 4th overall. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CommDownMan Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 Just now, skinny21 said: Not against calling him a reclamation project, but I’m reminded of Quinn/Whitt talking about finding what guys do well and using them to their strengths. Ferrell’s gonna be setting some edges in the run game for sure. I don't think he's lived up to his draft status, but I don't think reclamation makes sense (depending on what the knee issue was). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kalu44 Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 Does the Ferrell signing mean no Fowler? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FrFan Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 4 minutes ago, alaroche04 said: I'm watching a Panthers podcast and they are livid about losing Luvu. I've been browsing their forum, they're depressed. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skinny21 Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 Just now, JamesMadisonSkins said: Yep, it's $10m for the Top 51, I think about $14.5m for the total allocation. I agree ... think we'll carry over quite a bit of $$. What I expect rest of this primary FA cycle: Offensive Tackle - spend $$ here, is my guess Cornerback - reclamation project would be my guess (1-2 year deal) Safety - Stopgap type (Kearse) Linebacker - 1 year deal, smaller contract, primarily depth Offensive Tackle - 1 year deal, swing tackle Yeah, beside swing tackle, I didn’t (and maybe should have) included depth. We’ll sign a bunch of cheaper guys, though I doubt they affect our top 51/53 too much. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now