Medical Daily:Sex With Robots May Not Be Healthy, No Evidence For Speculated Benefits

[Riggo-toni]

While sex robots with limited abilities have already been invented (with sex doll brothels opening in some countries), there is yet to be a fully functioning model. 

In the book "Love and Sex with Robots," author David Levy discussed how love and sex with robots will experience a huge demand from lonely people who have a void in their lives. They are also advocated by some to potentially reduce sex-related crimes by providing an outlet to people who are unable to experience intimacy.

But upon searching the database to review scientific papers on the health impact of robots, the authors were not convinced. "Our conclusion is that there are a lot of health claims with no evidence," said Bewley. "In a way [this research] is a sort of academic plea [not to] make false claims, and if there is something genuine in this beyond the creation and marketing of a new device, then let’s study it properly."

 

https://www.medicaldaily.com/sex-robots-may-not-be-healthy-no-evidence-speculated-benefits-424553?amp=1

 

Full story at link.

[Bang]

So having a relationship with an artificial person may have damaging psychological effects?

 

well, i'll be...

 

~Dang

[Mr. Sinister]

10 minutes ago, Bang said:

So having a relationship with an artificial person may have damaging psychological effects?

 

well, i'll be...

 

~Dang

 

It's coming, and we're all screwed when it does...

[Renegade7]

Ya'll aren't going to win this one, its going to happen, and they'll be the first robots asking why people are allowed to sodomize them once they getting into turing test territory.

[Riggo-toni]

I don't care how unrealistic her personality is - I don't need a sexbot that can pass the Turing test; I want a sexbot that looks/feels like the real thing. Stuff out there now is just creepy.

[visionary]

[Renegade7]

16 minutes ago, Riggo-toni said:

I don't care how unrealistic her personality is - I don't need a sexbot that can pass the Turing test; I want a sexbot that looks/feels like the real thing. Stuff out there now is just creepy.

 

An inanimate corpse with a phat ass and a moan track?  Makes sense, people will want more, already asking for more.

[Riggo-toni]

Not corpse-like...More interested in genuine movement than noise...and don't forget about nice boobies.

[Dan T.]

Did we really need another Melania thread?

[Mr. Sinister]

7 minutes ago, Riggo-toni said:

Not corpse-like...More interested in genuine movement 

 

Weekend at Bernie's, eh?

[bearrock]

2 hours ago, Mr. Sinister said:

 

It's coming, and we're all screwed when it does...

 

Oh.... I thought I was gonna be doing the....  Not that there's anything wrong with that

[Riggo-toni]

13 minutes ago, Mr. Sinister said:

 

Weekend at Bernie's, eh?

Only in the sense that I would not need to move at all, and the sexbot would be doing all the grinding.

[Renegade7]

21 minutes ago, Riggo-toni said:

Not corpse-like...More interested in genuine movement than noise...and don't forget about nice boobies.

Nice rack, noted.  

 

What, like wrapping legs, wanting to kiss back, or getting on top without looking looking like a mechanical toy grabbing claw?  You watch sci-fi, you know it won't stop there, not when fetish modes start becoming available.

[Renegade7]

14 minutes ago, Riggo-toni said:

Only in the sense that I would not need to move at all, and the sexbot would be doing all the grinding.

Hope she doesn't bluescreen and scrape. them teeth better be just for show.

[China]

Cherry 2000 unavailable for comment

[Mr. Sinister]

1 hour ago, bearrock said:

 

Oh.... I thought I was gonna be doing the....  Not that there's anything wrong with that

 

Gotta cater to everybody. You bet your sweet ass that FistN'cuffs 3.0 (complete with chocolate morningstar) would sell like hotcakes...

[TD_washingtonredskins]

4 hours ago, Mr. Sinister said:

 

It's coming, and we're all screwed when it does...

 

This was intentional, I assume...

[Mr. Sinister]

30 minutes ago, TD_washingtonredskins said:

 

This was intentional, I assume...

 

Double entendre. It's definitely coming, and we're definitely screwed, but it's also definitely coming, and we're definitely screwed...

[CousinsCowgirl84]

It seems to me the author isn’t saying that sex with robots doesn’t have benefits, just that it hasn’t been proven 100 percent.  When is the octopus model coming out, i’d imagine it would be the swiss army knife of sex robots. 

[China]

24 minutes ago, CousinsCowgirl84 said:

It seems to me the author isn’t saying that sex with robots doesn’t have benefits, just that it hasn’t been proven 100 percent.  When is the octopus model coming out, i’d imagine it would be the swiss army knife of sex robots. 

 

So you're into tentacle porn...not that there's anything wrong with that.

 

[Sacks 'n' Stuff]

9 hours ago, Riggo-toni said:

I don't need a sexbot that can pass the Turing test

I don't really even like it when my real life girlfriends can pass the Turing test.

[Renegade7]

29 minutes ago, Sacks 'n' Stuff said:

I don't really even like it when my real life girlfriends can pass the Turing test.

[Destino]

Increased isolation, reduced social interaction for those with already poorly developed skills, and sexual appetites shaped by literal objects standing in for people.  Who could possibly doubt the health benefits?  

 

And thats ignoring that sex bots that look like children are already an issue.  

[Renegade7]

20 minutes ago, Destino said:

And thats ignoring that sex bots that look like children are already an issue.  

That should be illegal.  Does US allow that?  

[Corcaigh]

2 hours ago, Sacks 'n' Stuff said:

I don't really even like it when my real life girlfriends can pass the Turing test.

 

1st dates can be awkward.