lavar1156 Posted October 31, 2017 Share Posted October 31, 2017 We have CB depth and we probably won't resign him. What do you guys think? I'd take a 3rd for him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NewCliche21 Posted October 31, 2017 Share Posted October 31, 2017 Who would trade for him? He's injured and will be on the market next year. We also would be really smart to re-sign him. Norman's solid at 1, Fuller is great in the slot, and Breeland does great on our 2's. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BatteredFanSyndrome Posted October 31, 2017 Share Posted October 31, 2017 I can't see anyone give up a third considering he's a free agent we can't really afford. He's also hurt right now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PlayAction Posted October 31, 2017 Share Posted October 31, 2017 Breeland has an injured knee and groin pull. I think that teams want to trade for players that they can count on to help right now. Otherwise, they might as well wait till the offseason. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
benskins26 Posted October 31, 2017 Share Posted October 31, 2017 Did you pull this from that awful Bree for Hyde article? Feels like you did. And no one is giving a third. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lavar1156 Posted October 31, 2017 Author Share Posted October 31, 2017 Just now, benskins26 said: Did you pull this from that awful Bree for Hyde article? Feels like you did. And no one is giving a third. Nah Cooley mentioned it this morning. Maybe a 3rd is too much. But I would take something for him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Est.1974 Posted October 31, 2017 Share Posted October 31, 2017 No. I was fairly down on Breeland in the offseason but think he's played far better than expected this season....when fit that is... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Renegade7 Posted October 31, 2017 Share Posted October 31, 2017 I wish this was a poll so I could vote "no". I still haven't given up on him yet, he's not a bad corner, feel like he was doing better then last year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lavar1156 Posted October 31, 2017 Author Share Posted October 31, 2017 1 minute ago, Renegade7 said: I wish this was a poll so I could vote "no". I still haven't given up on him yet, he's not a bad corner, feel like he was doing better then last year. I agree he is playing well. But are we going to be able to resign him? Probably not. Sell high. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul Cumberland Posted October 31, 2017 Share Posted October 31, 2017 1 minute ago, lavar1156 said: I agree he is playing well. But are we going to be able to resign him? Probably not. Sell high. sell high is the correct move here,. we've got dunbar and moreau is waiting in the wings.. bree probably gone in the off season anyway. may as well get some value for him now.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Renegade7 Posted October 31, 2017 Share Posted October 31, 2017 4 minutes ago, lavar1156 said: I agree he is playing well. But are we going to be able to resign him? Probably not. Sell high. Why not? It's not like we need to save money for bringing Pryor back. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lavar1156 Posted October 31, 2017 Author Share Posted October 31, 2017 Just now, Renegade7 said: Why not? It's not like we need to save money for bringing Pryor back. But we have Dunbar, Fuller, and Moreau. Doesn't make sense. We may need to sign Kirk to another tender not to mention we have a few more looming contracts, including Scherff. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SlkyCaramel Posted October 31, 2017 Share Posted October 31, 2017 NO. He is a good #2, plays well with Norman. We need to try to re-sign him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Burgold Posted October 31, 2017 Share Posted October 31, 2017 I think about these things by looking at cost-basis. What can we get for him + the liklihood of resigning him - his worth to us this season. For a late round draft pick, his value to us this season is probably greater than someone who has low probability of making the team and contributing (which is true of most low draft picks). Trading him for a fifth or worse may be similar to giving him away for free or for someone who you hope turns into a long term back up/special teamer. If you can get a 1st or a 2nd then you get into an interesting conversation, but I doubt anyone will go there because because he's both injured and only under contract for this season. A (high) third might be worth having a conversation about, but that's really only if the liklihood of resigning him is close to zero. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lavar1156 Posted October 31, 2017 Author Share Posted October 31, 2017 Wasn't Breeland a 4th rounder? I'd do it for a 4th. And if we really want him back we can re-sing him in the off-season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RabidFan Posted October 31, 2017 Share Posted October 31, 2017 If they think Moreau and Dunbar can fill his shoes and they don't want to pay a lot for him then see what they can get Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
justice98 Posted October 31, 2017 Share Posted October 31, 2017 Personally, on the list of indispensable assets, I wouldnt consider Breeland to be one. But if he comes back, fine. If we parted and could get something for him, fine too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TD_washingtonredskins Posted October 31, 2017 Share Posted October 31, 2017 I personally think we should be listening to offers for (or even letting teams know the availability of) any player on an expiring contract. My only exception would be guys you truly believe will be re-signing with you. At 3-4 with the injuries that we have, this team should be selling rather than considering being a buyer. Hell, even if someone like Breeland left for the final 9 games, he could still ultimately wind up back here during FA. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skinny21 Posted October 31, 2017 Share Posted October 31, 2017 Breeland's been playing really well this year. He ain't going to be cheap next year, that's for sure. If the FO is planning on moving on from Kirk, I'm not sure it would make sense to re-sign Breeland. Dunbar though, I'd hope to re-sign. We won't get the compensation to match Breeland's skills (due to hitting FA after this year), but we're really close to the point of this year being a wash. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Renegade7 Posted October 31, 2017 Share Posted October 31, 2017 1 hour ago, lavar1156 said: But we have Dunbar, Fuller, and Moreau. Doesn't make sense. We may need to sign Kirk to another tender not to mention we have a few more looming contracts, including Scherff. I'm not ready to crown any of those guys you mentioned, and its to our benefit to have of all things the secondary be a strength in today's NFL. Scherff is under contract next year, and I hate to say it, but if Kirk plays hardball again, he needs to go, no way I let him play under the tag again, not for $34 million, hell no. Like you said, we have other guys we want to bring back, like Zach Brown. If we can get Kirk contract figured out, I can't agree with not making an offer to Breeland, but that's just me. http://www.spotrac.com/nfl/free-agents/washington-redskins/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taylorcooley1 Posted October 31, 2017 Share Posted October 31, 2017 Good god no..let's extend him this off season!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SemperFi Skins Posted October 31, 2017 Share Posted October 31, 2017 Its the Redskins..... we would probably give him away for free and owe the new team picks... We haven't made a smart trade since I've been alive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SemperFi Skins Posted October 31, 2017 Share Posted October 31, 2017 CBS Sports' Jason La Canfora reports the Redskins are "trying to land a wide receiver before the deadline." Terrelle Pryor's fantasy value is already dead and buried, but, if true, this would be a big blow to Josh Doctson's moving forward. It is also possible Washington is looking to replace Jamison Crowder or Ryan "Gruden" Grant, but that duo has looked locked into their spots as of late. Source: Jason La Canfora on Twitter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dark Acre Posted October 31, 2017 Share Posted October 31, 2017 44 minutes ago, TD_washingtonredskins said: At 3-4 with the injuries that we have, this team should be selling rather than considering being a buyer. Selling injured players? Did the Spurs sell David Robinson when they sucked the year before drafting Tim Duncan? Was it over when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor?? Did Joe Theismann fail to call time out just before end of the Dallas game in 1979??? No! No!! and No!!! If all our players were healthy and we still sucked, that's one thing. However, our injury factor is huge this year, which means get healthy and continue to improve though draft and FA. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wildbunny Posted October 31, 2017 Share Posted October 31, 2017 Germans bombed pearl harbor? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.