Jump to content
Washington Football Team Logo
Extremeskins

PlayAction

Members
  • Posts

    2,399
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About PlayAction

  • Birthday 08/28/1962

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    http://

Profile Information

  • Birthdate
    Jan 1, 1962
  • Washington Football Team Fan Since
    1972
  • Favorite Washington Football Team Player
    John Riggins
  • Not a Washington Football Team Fan? Tell us YOUR team:
    I am a Washington Football Fan
  • Location
    Mclean, Virginia
  • Zip Code
    22101
  • Interests
    none
  • Occupation
    none

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Right now, it seems that the team can potentially land as many as five future starters with these picks. But only if they don't trade them away to move up in the draft. So many options if we give up on the dream of an immediate starter at LT. We need a free agent who can hold down the fort in the near term and perhaps become the future swing tackle. I'm coming around to the BPA philosophy (within reason). Second Round No. 36, 40 Third Round No. 67, 78, 100
  2. At #29, I think all of the preferred OTs may already have been taken. At 23-24, there may already have been a good run on OTs. If I was a team with a first pick mid round 1, I would value an OT more highly than a CB given the depth at CB. I think we are more likely to have a wide choice of iOL and the second tier of OL.
  3. Peters isn't afraid to move around in the draft as we have seen with the Howell trade and SF's past history. I like the moves in the 3rd round to be better positioned to pick the highest value in 2024. Considering the depth at certain positions, picks 36, 40, 67, 78, and 100 are going to be interesting. My guess is that bpa will mean a WR and CB somewhere in the 2nd and 3rd rounds. Probably iOL. We are all anxious about OT. If it doesn't work out as we hope, perhaps year 1 of the rebuild will involve 2TE sets quite often.
  4. Rare is not raw. If you like your steak well done....you don't like steak. What is Peters cooking up today? The remake is happening before our eyes but each free agent signing is becoming a dopamine fix for fans.
  5. It's fairly likely that a first round OT slips to the top of the second round. But, every team will know that the Commanders need one. The cost to jump ahead of us and select the last OT is a small price to pay. I don't want Peters to trade up into the first round though. The cost in lost players is too high.
  6. Ten OL and eight WR picked before #36. What do you think of Barton and Isaac? Which, if any, of the other players selected in the second round would you have preferred?
  7. I'm not optimistic about the LTs being pushed down. If another team needs a tackle and a WR, I'd take the tackle and roll the dice on the WR late in the second round. I'm guessing some of the first round WR slip (more so than the tackles). I cant see Peters gambling that a day 1 starter LT would fall to #36. I think we will get a free agent LT and he will draft a tackle to slot in at Guard for experience. Later, the draftee could move over to Tackle or serve as the swing tackle while other players are the backup Guards.
  8. So, we pick a QB at #2 and then spend 2 out of the next three picks on DEs? It seems like an over-investment at one position when there will probably be other positions available at similar grades. I recognize that if you pass on Robinson at #36 or #40, you might find that some other team picks Booker before #67.
  9. Hmm. Will it cost pick 36 and pick 103 to get pick 30? We are more likely to get our preferred OT with 36 than 40 so I'm not sure I want to give up the first second round pick. Pick 103 is likely to be a good BPA (position unknown).
×
×
  • Create New...