grego Posted May 23, 2017 Share Posted May 23, 2017 5 hours ago, BornaSkinsFan83 said: White people need to quit that bull**** of nervously looking the other way and ignoring **** when they hear fellow white people start talking stupid. And don't play dumb. You all know exactly what I'm talking about. White racists are the dumbest moops around. You have the right skin tone (see not brown) and they'll always assume you think like them and they can talk freely. Every single one of you has experienced it and probably recently. I don't care if it's family, friend, coworker, stranger, silence isn't an option for us anymore, no matter how uncomfortable the situation is. Don't be a ****. Stand up for something. And white parents are obviously having some major issues and failing in big ways right now but I'm not really qualified to speak on that. Just what the ****. Stop letting the Internet raise your kids for you. Lazy. **** is embarrassing. Im afraid to ask..... What happened? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gamebreaker Posted May 23, 2017 Author Share Posted May 23, 2017 Somehow, this racist in a wheelchair is able to verbally berate this man who did nothing wrong for eight minutes and no one who worked at the airport intervened. I mean, really???! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted May 27, 2017 Share Posted May 27, 2017 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedskinsMayne Posted May 27, 2017 Share Posted May 27, 2017 (edited) someone times people aren't racist... sometimes they're just crazy Edited May 27, 2017 by RedskinsMayne 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted May 27, 2017 Share Posted May 27, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larry Posted May 27, 2017 Share Posted May 27, 2017 13 minutes ago, RedskinsMayne said: someone times people aren't racist... sometimes they're just crazy Wondering if you would have rushed in here with the same deflection if the "crazy man" had yelled "Allahu Akbar!" 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Major Harris Posted May 27, 2017 Share Posted May 27, 2017 It's fun to watch the tables continuously turn. I remember not too long ago the right was complaining about how we wouldn't label terrorism as such when it came to a certain group. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Major Harris Posted May 27, 2017 Share Posted May 27, 2017 On 5/22/2017 at 3:50 PM, BornaSkinsFan83 said: White people need to quit that bull**** of nervously looking the other way and ignoring **** when they hear fellow white people start talking stupid. And don't play dumb. You all know exactly what I'm talking about. White racists are the dumbest moops around. You have the right skin tone (see not brown) and they'll always assume you think like them and they can talk freely. Every single one of you has experienced it and probably recently. I don't care if it's family, friend, coworker, stranger, silence isn't an option for us anymore, no matter how uncomfortable the situation is. Don't be a ****. Stand up for something. And white parents are obviously having some major issues and failing in big ways right now but I'm not really qualified to speak on that. Just what the ****. Stop letting the Internet raise your kids for you. Lazy. **** is embarrassing. Saw thread title and immediately began looking for this rant. Didn't disappoint. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gamebreaker Posted May 27, 2017 Author Share Posted May 27, 2017 7 hours ago, RedskinsMayne said: someone times people aren't racist... sometimes they're just crazy Yes, they aren't racist. Even though they are violently attacking people and saying racist things. Please remove your head out of the ground. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedskinsMayne Posted May 27, 2017 Share Posted May 27, 2017 (edited) 9 minutes ago, Gamebreaker said: Yes, they aren't racist. Even though they are violently attacking people and saying racist things. Please remove your head out of the ground. I think it's more likely a person running around the train shouting every racist name in the book and stabbing random people is more likely than not mainly crazy. However, since the two aren't mutually exclusive he could be racist as well. Edited May 27, 2017 by RedskinsMayne Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Corcaigh Posted May 27, 2017 Share Posted May 27, 2017 (edited) Apparently people have lots of definitions of terrorism. US current law is clear: "A person engages in domestic terrorism if they do an act ""dangerous to human life"" that is a violation of the criminal laws of a state or the United States, if the act appears to be intended to: (i) intimidate or coerce a civilian population; (ii) influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; or (iii) to affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination or kidnapping. " Doesn't have to be part of an organization. Lone wolfs are terrorists. Shouting slogans or being abusive isn't terrorism Claiming that a person might be simply crazy because they target a particular group based on skin color or religion is a reach. They might be racist or bigoted AND crazy, but they are not vanilla-flavor crazy. Vanilla-flavor crazy people rant and rave about alien abduction, chemtrails, vaccine conspiracies and how this year will be the one that the Redskins win it all. Edited May 27, 2017 by Corcaigh 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Llevron Posted May 27, 2017 Share Posted May 27, 2017 1 hour ago, RedskinsMayne said: I think it's more likely a person running around the train shouting every racist name in the book and stabbing random people is more likely than not mainly crazy. However, since the two aren't mutually exclusive he could be racist as well. Ahhhh the old "He's a crazy person" defense! Never get tired of that one. That's the white mans go to move. It's not like we don't have evidence of one problem and literally ZERO of the other. Dude probably really loves minorities and was just confused. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted May 27, 2017 Share Posted May 27, 2017 (edited) We should probably round up his buddies to be safe.... Edited May 27, 2017 by visionary 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Llevron Posted May 27, 2017 Share Posted May 27, 2017 Right. They may also be crazy and not racist. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gamebreaker Posted May 27, 2017 Author Share Posted May 27, 2017 Clearly.....that guy isn't a racist. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tshile Posted May 27, 2017 Share Posted May 27, 2017 7 hours ago, Corcaigh said: Apparently people have lots of definitions of terrorism. US current law is clear: "A person engages in domestic terrorism if they do an act ""dangerous to human life"" that is a violation of the criminal laws of a state or the United States, if the act appears to be intended to: (i) intimidate or coerce a civilian population; (ii) influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; or (iii) to affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination or kidnapping. " Doesn't have to be part of an organization. Lone wolfs are terrorists. Shouting slogans or being abusive isn't terrorism Claiming that a person might be simply crazy because they target a particular group based on skin color or religion is a reach. They might be racist or bigoted AND crazy, but they are not vanilla-flavor crazy. Vanilla-flavor crazy people rant and rave about alien abduction, chemtrails, vaccine conspiracies and how this year will be the one that the Redskins win it all. Seems like you bolded the wrong part of the definition... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Corcaigh Posted May 27, 2017 Share Posted May 27, 2017 53 minutes ago, tshile said: Seems like you bolded the wrong part of the definition... I've no idea what you mean. I would argue based on the definition that the Portland White Supremacist is guilty of many things, but terrorism isn't one of them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larry Posted May 27, 2017 Share Posted May 27, 2017 (edited) 34 minutes ago, Corcaigh said: I've no idea what you mean. I would argue based on the definition that the Portland White Supremacist is guilty of many things, but terrorism isn't one of them. Which part of the quoted definition do you think his action does not meet? Edited May 27, 2017 by Larry 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Springfield Posted May 28, 2017 Share Posted May 28, 2017 (edited) Well that's pretty obviously terrorism. And so much for white people not stepping in and doing something about it? Got them killed though. And does the picture of the guy wearing the ****ing USA flag as a cape piss you off or what? I'm looking at you, douchebags with the giant American flags flying on your pick up trucks and stupid United States flag shirts and your douchey "don't tread on me" regalia. Edited May 28, 2017 by Springfield Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tshile Posted May 28, 2017 Share Posted May 28, 2017 (edited) 4 hours ago, Corcaigh said: I've no idea what you mean. I would argue based on the definition that the Portland White Supremacist is guilty of many things, but terrorism isn't one of them. I feel like when the definition of terrorism needs to be explained, the emphasis should be on bullets i, ii, and iii. Not the dangerous to human life part. Not a comment against the thread idea, because I agree that terrorism is used too loosely with anyone non-white, and seemingly never with anyone White, but I think terrorism (as a term) should be used in a very specific way. The definition I'm used to is like the one you posted, but leaves out point i. That first point is very general - intimidate or coerce a civilian population. Before reading that, I wouldnt have called the guy who shot up the church in SC a terrorist (even though I would love for him to receive punishment as if he was.) It didn't seem political or directed at influencing the government. It definitely does intimidate a civilian population though... I don't disagree with point one, I've just never considered it, and it expands the scope of the term. Would the shooter at Sandy hook qualify under that? Was he trying to intimidate a civial population? Or was he just mentally ill. I don't think the word should be used loosely or the meaning of it just cast off because of the idea that only use it for non-white people. Anyways, I just found it weird that the dangerous to human life was the part in bold. May have been from the source, and not by you though. Or I might have just missed the context of the conversation (if so - sorry about that...) Edited May 28, 2017 by tshile Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted May 28, 2017 Share Posted May 28, 2017 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Corcaigh Posted May 28, 2017 Share Posted May 28, 2017 (edited) 4 hours ago, Larry said: Which part of the quoted definition do you think his action does not meet? The dangerous act was not directed to 'a civilian population', and by that my understanding is a particular group being targeted, it was to the bye-standers who intervened. Verbally abusing and intimidating the Muslim women resulted in him being charged with a crime (second-degree intimidation), but it is not an act of terrorism according to the law. If he'd assaulted the women it may have met the definition. Edited May 28, 2017 by Corcaigh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BornaSkinsFan83 Posted May 28, 2017 Share Posted May 28, 2017 (edited) Deplorable human beings. At this point, part of me hopes another civil war happens. Dude that called my girlfriend q chimpanzee late last year mightve been able to duck out in time but I'm primed and ready for the next one. And innocent randos aren't going to be the ones getting plugged in the neck. Promise that. I'm just so sick and tired of these over-compensating, disgusting, hooplehead **** stains. The empathy and patience ran out long ago. I have absolutely no interest in sharing a nation with them if they're going to continue be in our faces with their bull**** and an active threat to our peace of mind and general welfare. None whatsoever. And i might be the only one saying it but I guarantee I'm not the only one feeling it. Edited May 28, 2017 by BornaSkinsFan83 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BornaSkinsFan83 Posted May 28, 2017 Share Posted May 28, 2017 And you better believe these ****ers are local too Almost all my life I've lived in this area. 30 some years. Never, not once, did I witness some crazy racist ****. Not once. I remember the first time in my life hearing the word n****r be used. At a little league tourney. In Tennessee. I was 12 or 13. They were ****ing about "that n****r" Woodson winning the Heisman over Peyton. It shocked me so much to actually be witnessing such a thing firsthand and so casually even, that's it's arguably the most vivid memory from my childhood. So to now see this **** happening here of all places, we've got a problem America. White families, white parents, are failing on an epic scale. We need to have that discussion ASAP. We are headed down a very dark road. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kosher Ham Posted May 28, 2017 Share Posted May 28, 2017 I actually am more along the lines of all families. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now