PleaseBlitz Posted August 1, 2018 Share Posted August 1, 2018 Quote Russian Collusion with the Trump Campaign, one of the most successful in history..... I won't get into theories on comma placement (unless you want me to ), but I read this as the collusion was one of the most successful in history. And I agree. 2 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AsburySkinsFan Posted August 1, 2018 Share Posted August 1, 2018 2 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted August 1, 2018 Share Posted August 1, 2018 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LD0506 Posted August 1, 2018 Share Posted August 1, 2018 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cooked Crack Posted August 1, 2018 Share Posted August 1, 2018 Seems legit 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted August 1, 2018 Share Posted August 1, 2018 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DogofWar1 Posted August 1, 2018 Share Posted August 1, 2018 1 hour ago, PleaseBlitz said: I won't get into theories on comma placement (unless you want me to ), but I read this as the collusion was one of the most successful in history. And I agree. It's the 2nd most controversial comma placement in American public life, right behind the 2nd Amendment. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sacks 'n' Stuff Posted August 1, 2018 Share Posted August 1, 2018 (edited) 11 minutes ago, DogofWar1 said: It's the 2nd most controversial comma placement in American public life, right behind the 2nd Amendment. A few years ago somebody posted this sentence diagram of the second amendment that supposedly proved how the part about a militia and the part about the right to own guns were two separate, independent statements. Then he said “those commas, they are important.” So I said, “I have two questions. 1. What about those commas? 2. What are important?” Edited August 1, 2018 by Sacks 'n' Stuff 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PleaseBlitz Posted August 1, 2018 Share Posted August 1, 2018 (edited) 14 minutes ago, Sacks 'n' Stuff said: A few years ago somebody posted this sentence diagram of the second amendment that supposedly proved how the part about a militia and the part about the right to own guns were two separate, independent statements. Then he said “those commas, they are important.” So I said, “I have two questions. 1. What about those commas? 2. What are important?” My one question would have been “then why aren’t they periods?” yes, I am a Huuuuuge nerd. Edited August 1, 2018 by PleaseBlitz 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AsburySkinsFan Posted August 1, 2018 Share Posted August 1, 2018 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkinsHokieFan Posted August 1, 2018 Share Posted August 1, 2018 This isn’t hard guys Donald Trump and the imbeciles in his family are traitors. Donald has been since the 80s when he got in bed with the Soviets 4 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted August 1, 2018 Share Posted August 1, 2018 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cooked Crack Posted August 1, 2018 Share Posted August 1, 2018 I'm feel bad for the ostrich. Lost in real life and the afterlife. 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TradeTheBeal! Posted August 2, 2018 Share Posted August 2, 2018 4 1 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Springfield Posted August 2, 2018 Share Posted August 2, 2018 That’s an ugly ass coat Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Sinister Posted August 2, 2018 Share Posted August 2, 2018 25 minutes ago, Springfield said: That’s an ugly ass coat Looks exactly like the type of thing an old ass rich dude with no style would buy 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Springfield Posted August 2, 2018 Share Posted August 2, 2018 That $15,000 coat has to be money laundering, right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mistertim Posted August 2, 2018 Share Posted August 2, 2018 3 minutes ago, Springfield said: That $15,000 coat has to be money laundering, right? I think it's actually the opening of a new raft of charges for crimes against fashion. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlvinWaltonIsMyBoy Posted August 2, 2018 Share Posted August 2, 2018 (edited) 15 minutes ago, Mr. Sinister said: Looks exactly like the type of thing an old ass rich dude with no style would buy I kinda liked it. Now I know why. This trial pleases me. Excited to see who they call tomorrow. Edited August 2, 2018 by AlvinWaltonIsMyBoy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mistertim Posted August 2, 2018 Share Posted August 2, 2018 i now have this mental image of Paul Manafort walking around NYC in that jacket and a pair of diamond encrusted Yeezy 750s. 1 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TradeTheBeal! Posted August 2, 2018 Share Posted August 2, 2018 You can pick up this swaggy joint for about $1500. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AsburySkinsFan Posted August 2, 2018 Share Posted August 2, 2018 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hersh Posted August 2, 2018 Share Posted August 2, 2018 6 hours ago, AsburySkinsFan said: I think Mueller is good limiting questions to obstruction because they have a boat load of evidence related to collusion/conspiracy/potential financial crimes. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AsburySkinsFan Posted August 2, 2018 Share Posted August 2, 2018 29 minutes ago, Hersh said: I think Mueller is good limiting questions to obstruction because they have a boat load of evidence related to collusion/conspiracy/potential financial crimes. Then let Trump Co. be stupid enough to answer them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bozo the kKklown Posted August 2, 2018 Share Posted August 2, 2018 Manafort definitely had an Avirex bomber 9 hours ago, Springfield said: That’s an ugly ass coat You are bugging. That jacket is cold and is suitable for a young Brooklyn cat who also rocks Supreme. Manafort is a hypebeast. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now