Jump to content
Washington Football Team Logo
Extremeskins

Rumsfeld: Democracy in Iraq was 'unrealistic'


@DCGoldPants

Recommended Posts

http://www.cnn.com/2015/06/09/politics/rumsfeld-no-democracy-in-iraq/index.html

 

Former Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld now said that the goal of creating a democracy in Iraq was "unrealistic" and that he was "concerned" when he first heard the idea floated by former President George W. Bush, a stark admission by one of the Iraq War's biggest defenders.
 
"I'm not one who thinks that our particular template of democracy is appropriate for other countries at every moment of their histories. The idea that we could fashion a democracy in Iraq seemed to me unrealistic. I was concerned about it when I first heard those words," Rumsfeld told the Times of London last weekend.
 
The comments mark a rare departure for Rumsfeld, who has been one of the staunchest defenders of the Iraq War started by Bush, but also a sharp critic of President Barack Obama's handling of it.
 
Rumsfeld also raised broader concerns that the global nation-state system faces a threat of replacement by Islamic caliphates and said that NATO and the United Nations may be unequipped to handle threats from Islamic extremists.

 

 
 
Thanks, jerk.

 

More from the link.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm proud of what my unit accomplished in Mosul.  We did a lot of good over there.

 

Unfortunate that the greater country fell apart, for a plethora of reasons.

 

I hope that area of the world gets their shizz together.  Gorgeous and full of history.  Unless, of course, Isis continues to destroy all things history related.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

However, the plan to create a great deal of wealth for defense contractors by creating an enormous billion-dollar boondoggle in Irag was very realistic and worked perfectly.

For example....

Houston-based energy-focused engineering and construction firm KBR, Inc. (NYSE:KBR), which was spun off from its parent, oilfield services provider Halliburton Co. (NYSE:HAL), in 2007 was given $39.5 billion in Iraq-related contracts over the past decade, with many of the deals given without any bidding from competing firms, such as a $568-million contract renewal in 2010 to provide housing, meals, water and bathroom services to soldiers, a deal that led to a Justice Department lawsuit over alleged kickbacks, as reported by Bloomberg.                                                                                   

http://readersupportednews.org/news-section2/308-12/16561-focus-cheneys-halliburton-made-395-billion-on-iraq-war

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Incredible how in 2002 we had the world behind us 100% on the anti-terror effort and in a matter of 2 years pissed it all away. Along with trillions of dollars, thousands of American lives, tens/hundreds of thousands of Iraqi lives, regional stability, and possibly the longterm prosperity of our nation.

The extent of the ripple effect from this unilateral decision is yet to be determined and will play out over decades. Maybe generations.

So yeah, thanks a lot jerk. Tell your bud Cheney to go **** himself too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll never forget the story my friend Katie once shared with me.

 

She was working for the State Department and had been sent as apart of a team to Iraq. Their mission was to help hammer out the peace terms.  She said that the going was grueling and tough. Finally, after one 72 straight hour stint they thought they had it.  An agreement everyone could live with America, Sunni Shia, Kurd, but just when they were about to sign one of the representatives stood up and declared...

 

"This is all well and good, but you are forgetting what he did to my people" and he pointed at one of the other faction representatives, "300 years ago!" and the whole thing broke down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think we should have left well enough alone.  Saddam could be managed, and while the results weren't perfect they were more to our benefit than what we have now.  It was supremely arrogant to think we can impose our will on folks over there with anything short of total annihilation/occupation.  And no one wanted that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

so ya'll are saying we shoulda installed a puppet?

1). Actually, that's what Rumsfield claims that he DID say. To the President. At the time.

2). And I'll point out, that IS what I said, on this board, at the time. (Not that a puppet is what we SHOULD do. But that the odds are overwhelming that that's what we were going to wind up with).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Shoulda coulda woulda.

 

Bottom line is those people need help.  We're responsible for the situation, as is most of the world.

 

And we continue to sit on our hands and do nothing.

 

The bigger problem is that if we were to go and stomp out ISIS, another group would take over.  Square one.

 

I don't know the answer, but someone somewhere who is smart on these things must know what to do.

 

Failure to act is supporting the current status quo.  We suck right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1). Actually, that's what Rumsfield claims that he DID say. To the President. At the time.

2). And I'll point out, that IS what I said, on this board, at the time. (Not that a puppet is what we SHOULD do. But that the odds are overwhelming that that's what we were going to wind up with).

 

Personally I support/ed giving them a chance, it is not going to be w/o growing pains.

 

the game encompasses much more than Iraq, though even there the Kurds have progressed....and it is a looong game

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I don't know the answer, but someone somewhere who is smart on these things must know what to do.

 

Failure to act is supporting the current status quo.  We suck right now.

Open up the immigration lines?  

 

I lean towards ripping off the bandaid and being done with it.  We ****ed up really badly and there is no way to fix it.  It will have to heal on its own.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We're responsible for the situation, as is most of the world.

I'm wondering how most of the world is responsible for the mess we created in Iraq. The "coalition of the willing" was a joke. The UN opposed us on the invasion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...