SuperBash Posted February 22, 2012 Share Posted February 22, 2012 I love lamp, but I don't know if I really love lamp or if I'm just saying it because I saw it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hitman21ST Posted February 22, 2012 Share Posted February 22, 2012 28? Was he in the military?~Bang Played a few years in the Yankees farm system Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darth Tater Posted February 22, 2012 Share Posted February 22, 2012 Peter Warrick? 4th overall pick in 2000 draft Not in the year in question for Chris which was the year after Warrick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manny555 Posted February 22, 2012 Share Posted February 22, 2012 To be fair, a lot of reports said how well he looked. He had the most zip and best pocket presence in the senior bowl. Just sayin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A Skinhead in Saints Land Posted February 22, 2012 Share Posted February 22, 2012 Ah, another Chris Weinke. Good times. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rdskn4Lyf21 Posted February 22, 2012 Share Posted February 22, 2012 As a smokescreen I love him. If that were to happen...well, :shot: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prototype Posted February 23, 2012 Share Posted February 23, 2012 Please only be a rumor contrived in the author's sick head Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reaper 21 Posted February 23, 2012 Share Posted February 23, 2012 I think now the best way to figure out who our qb is the one nobody said anything about yet so eliminate Peyton Manning Andrew Luck Robert Griffin the III Matt flynn Ryan Tannehill Brandon Weeden Kyle Orton Rex Grossman that leaves us the truth Brock Osweiler hahah I kid Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC9 Posted February 23, 2012 Share Posted February 23, 2012 I haven't seen this much smoke since my sophomore year at VCU.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rambler01 Posted February 23, 2012 Share Posted February 23, 2012 I'd rather have Foles instead personally... You would definitely like my sig! In regard to the post; I wouldn't mind having Weeden because he was a stat factory at Oklahoma State (and we all love stats on this board). I'm just feeling restless waiting for the draft and at this point, I'd support anybody not named Grossman or Beck come Day 1. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redrobert Posted February 23, 2012 Share Posted February 23, 2012 Trent's gonna love protecting 'The Weed'. This is the best line on ExtremeSkins this year, maybe ever. Well played sir! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coolio47 Posted February 23, 2012 Share Posted February 23, 2012 Trent's gonna love protecting 'The Weed'. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spunkush Posted February 23, 2012 Share Posted February 23, 2012 I don't care what your age is, when a QB comes out of college, it will take them 3-4 years before they can be considered elite or great... By that time Weedon will be 33. Then he will play his best play from 33-36 and then fall off physically. So we would only really get 3-4 years of 1st round qb play. And that's all hoping he lives up to his potential. Most QBs are in the middle of their prime at 29, and weedon will be in his prime when most QBs start losing their touch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vooskin Posted February 23, 2012 Share Posted February 23, 2012 Ok so a few weeks ago I got this idea that I would keep a draft diary of what I thought of all the prospects that the redskins could possibly be linked to. Brandon Weeden was the first guy I did and as I turned out, the only one. This is what I wrote: Brandon Weeden: Doesn't go through progressions much, has propensity to stick to one WR or side of field and make decision where he's going pre-snap. Some issues like this could be viewed as something that can be worked with over time with more experience, unfortunately he's already older than Aaron Rodgers. Weak arm, can get behind it and get good velocity on the ball but from a pure arm strength standpoint and not throwing with the whole body his arm isn't very good. Adequate for the college game and short to some intermediate routes, IMO, in the NFL he will struggle with the closing speed of DBs Deep accuracy is rather poor, had WRs very good at playing the ball and going after it on his team which led to a lot of deep completions. Positive trusts his receivers one on one and will take the shots needed. Played in spread which almost always left him with open receivers. His go to WR was also the best at his position in the country in 2011 Average release, ok touch, accuracy on short to intermediate is good, not great. Good job reading pre-snap possibly causing him to rely on it too much 4-5 round value, between skillset, size, and age it is hard to feel good about taking Weeden in the second or third, does not warrant a pick that high. Ok so this is what I got after watching like only 3 games of his so obviously Im not someone you can bank on but I've noticed some people claim similar things about him which encourages me. I'm sure I could go into much more detail but after the first few minutes I started to grow tired of writing ha, oh well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dsciambi Posted February 23, 2012 Share Posted February 23, 2012 Based on those Fiesta Bowl highlights, he looks terrible to me. Most of the big passes were YAC from Blackmon. Of the others, a lot were balls that weren't thrown to a very good spot for the receiver, and he had a ton of just BAD looking passes which weren't even close to being caught. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unforgiven Posted February 23, 2012 Share Posted February 23, 2012 I'd be fine drafting Weeden, but I hope he has to compete with someone (a FA QB) other than Grossman for the starting job. That being said....please please...RG3. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SWFLSkins Posted February 23, 2012 Share Posted February 23, 2012 I haven't seen this much smoke since my sophomore year at VCU.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Probos Posted February 23, 2012 Share Posted February 23, 2012 Here is Weeden at the Fiesta Bowl this year. He opens the game with a bad INT, and a few sloppy throws, but once he got warmed up, he looked good. aUbkSR4wtWI He finished the day 29 of 42 for 399 yards with 3 TDs and 1 INT. He is pretty good. He looked good. But after watching that I'd rather have Blackmon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jethrodsp Posted February 23, 2012 Share Posted February 23, 2012 I am now more positive than ever that the skins are looking RG3 or Tannehill in the draft. And neither of these picks precludes keeping an eye on Manning should he be relieved of his post in Indy. Makes me smile. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TaylorPickSix Posted February 23, 2012 Share Posted February 23, 2012 i'm gonna laugh when peyton's healthy, the colts absolutely fleece us for the number one overall pick, and we get andrew luck for a gazillion draft picks hahaha. the point is you cant believe ANYTHING you hear right now, because we just don't know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HailGreen28 Posted February 23, 2012 Share Posted February 23, 2012 i'm gonna laugh when peyton's healthy, the colts absolutely fleece us for the number one overall pick, and we get andrew luck for a gazillion draft picks hahaha.the point is you cant believe ANYTHING you hear right now, because we just don't know. And TK's basically said as far as the draft and free agency goes this season, don't put the cart (d) before the horse (fa). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dana87 Posted February 23, 2012 Share Posted February 23, 2012 He will be available in the 2nd round for sure. Maybe even the 3rd round. Taking him in the 1st would be a colossal waste. If the Skins trade down in the 1st and get Tannehill that would make more sense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TD_washingtonredskins Posted February 23, 2012 Share Posted February 23, 2012 Like the guy on Twitter said *Cough* *Cough* Smokescreen I don't mean to single this post out...but these types of posts crack me up. We have "insiders" on this board who have admitted that there is no way to know what Shanahan and Allen will do come April. So, to claim that this is simply a smokescreen is ridiculous. Even someone like TK or LL56 might have information that Shanahan is leaning toward trading up for RG3 or trading back for Tannehill (I made those scenarios up as examples). But that doesn't mean anyone knows what will happen in 2 months. It's just as likely that we end up with Weeden as it is we end up with anyone else. Can't this report that Shanahan loves Weeden simply mean that Shanahan loves Weeden? It doesn't have to be false information purposely released. It doesn't have to mean we're going to draft him. It could just be a coach who appreciates what a player brings to the table. I'm sure I could find an article stating that Shanahan loves Aaron Rodgers, but reading that wouldn't automatically ring a bell in my brain that he's either pretending that's the case or about to trade 8 firsts for him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lazarus0280 Posted February 23, 2012 Share Posted February 23, 2012 What if we got Blackmon with our first pick, then Weeden with our first pick of second round..... lol. Wouldn't that kind of be interesting? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stophovr6 Posted February 23, 2012 Share Posted February 23, 2012 Trade down and pick him up late in the first? Gross. IF we can't get RG3 and IF we can get Blackmon at 6 and IF nothing else pans out at QB, I'd take him in the 5th round or later. I bet Weeden signed baseballs for kids he was throwing against in opposing secondaries. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.