Coolio47

I want to start Scary Terry in my flex this weekend, have him and breida as my RB2/Flex players, but the talk of Callahan wanting to emphasize the run more makes me think I should slide Peterson into the flex instead...may have to go Peterson here.

This has to be one of the more toxic posts I've seen, joking or not. There are so many things about this post that are ignorant and dumb, and clearly based off resentment from the team's 0-5 record, that I don't even know where to start. Team just finished a game that put them at 0-5, emotions are naturally going to run high. He clearly knows his coach is going to be fired, the coach that helped him make a name for himself, and probably feels like he failed his coach/colleague/friend, contributing to his firing. He has every right to be this emotional, as he should be. Doesn't make him "a ****ing [childish insult] ", it makes him a damn human being. But yeah, let's mock and resent him for it. Yeah, he should mask his emotions based upon how it makes you feel. Totally healthy way to deal with your emotions is to keep them bottled up, as to not annoy others. The condescension is strong with this one. Yeah,? Not a thinly veiled, resentful rant? If so, it's not a funny one. But I suppose it's easier to backtrack on a "bit" regarding a clearly upset player, as opposed to a hard stance. Everything about this post is pointless.

Montez Sweat suited up. Anyone know about Guice?

Ready to see Guice's return, and obviously, to see what Haskins looks like.

Somewhere in here it said the Colts were searching for a CB via trade. They should start there.

Not sure what Finlay is getting at here...

I figured as much, though I wonder which "big" WR they could realistically be targeting. I've seen rumors of AJ Green being on the trade block, wonder if they have inquired about him. Not sure what his contract looks like.

The responses though....

Sounds like we were never in it to begin with, but this makes it even less likely, which is a relief.

I wonder if there is any scenario where the FO considers trading up into the 5-10 area. Not saying they should, but if a player they covet falls to that area, do they consider it?

Just saw this.

Ah, that would make sense then...get it done, Bruce!

Not really sure what this is meant to imply...is there a FA we're pursuing that I'm not aware of?

I wonder how long this has been in the works? And how involved/aware was Gruden? Seemed like he loved Kirk as his QB, but some interviews around the end of the season, in regards to Kirks' contract situation, made it seem like Gruden already knew Kirk wasn't going to be the QB in 2018.