The Bounty Hunter #21 Posted March 7, 2009 Share Posted March 7, 2009 Yes..Pure Jealousy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skinsfor4 Posted March 7, 2009 Share Posted March 7, 2009 Waaaaah Waaaaaaah Waaaaaaaaaaah! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peregrine Posted March 7, 2009 Share Posted March 7, 2009 It is a different article with different details, so it isn't exactly the same thing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigMike619 Posted March 7, 2009 Share Posted March 7, 2009 could probably still merge them though... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
terrifNick21 Posted March 7, 2009 Share Posted March 7, 2009 oh yeah, **** tennessee. +1000000 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HA1LV1CT0RY Posted March 7, 2009 Share Posted March 7, 2009 Didn't they say that Haynesworth had at least 7 offers? Why wouldn't they accuse everyone else of tampering too? Because 7 other teams didn't sit down with his agent then sign him the next day. But it's all speculation, the titans are just whiny ****es. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PrimetimeSkins26 Posted March 7, 2009 Share Posted March 7, 2009 **** you Titans. Let the filters do their job. Thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bikie Posted March 8, 2009 Share Posted March 8, 2009 I love that these guys are ****ing about something they had a year to do ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoVaSkins21 Posted March 8, 2009 Share Posted March 8, 2009 I am just wondering what would the Skins would lose as far as picks are concerned if they are found guilty of tampering? I hope it's not any of the picks this year given that they only have four. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paloosa Posted March 8, 2009 Share Posted March 8, 2009 None issue. It would have happened by now and the way he addressed it tells me they aren't going to do it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Burgundy Burner Posted March 8, 2009 Share Posted March 8, 2009 The only thing this is designed to do is send Dan Snyder a message - and he will ignore it. florio is grasping at straws. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westbrook36 Posted March 8, 2009 Share Posted March 8, 2009 This is going to be awesome. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PCS Posted March 8, 2009 Share Posted March 8, 2009 This is going to be awesome. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bubba9497 Posted March 8, 2009 Share Posted March 8, 2009 hmmmm, what about the Bucs and giants? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
corrupt3d Posted March 8, 2009 Share Posted March 8, 2009 This is going to be awesome. Almost as awesome as the Iggles losing out on Brian Dawkins. Almost. :eaglesuck Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bulldog Posted March 8, 2009 Share Posted March 8, 2009 Bud Adams is cheap. He could have signed Haynesworth to a new contract in 2007 OR 2008 but chose to franchise him and make him play out the tender. That rarely works out in the player staying with the team. Adams is the same guy that prevented Steve McNair from using the Titans facilities to rehab from his knee injury because he was slated to be a free agent. And that was after all McNair had done in Tennessee to help the team win over 11 seasons. Jeff Fisher is an excellent coach but the rest of that organization is questionable at best in terms of their own ethics. Good luck proving tampering in a case where it took almost 5 hours of telecon for the Redskins to work out a deal with Haynesworth. It's not like the deal was sent into the league office at 1am all completed :laugh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkinsOrlando Posted March 8, 2009 Share Posted March 8, 2009 Sour grapes, nothing more, nothing less. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HighOnHendrix Posted March 8, 2009 Share Posted March 8, 2009 right... The reputation of Snyder/Vinny means they don't have to tamper. No agent worth his salt is gonna sign with any team without waiting for Vinny's ridiculous contract offer and deciding whether they want to get paid or win. Now that's funny. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Justsomeguy Posted March 8, 2009 Share Posted March 8, 2009 No matter what they won't be getting Big Al back. Hahaha Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4skins23 Posted March 8, 2009 Share Posted March 8, 2009 too bad titans aren't in our division. This definitely has the making of a rivalry and some bad blood amongst the fans. Why not the cowgirls? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillyKilmer Posted March 8, 2009 Share Posted March 8, 2009 http://nfl.fanhouse.com/2009/03/07/titans-think-redskins-tampered-with-albert-haynesworth/ The Tennessee Titans believe that the Washington Redskins broke the NFL's tampering rules in their signing of Albert Haynesworth, and now the only question is whether they can prove it to Commissioner Roger Goodell. Jim Wyatt of the Nashville Tennessean is reporting that the Titans are interested in pursuing the charges. That's no surprise: Reports swirled in the days before free agency opened that the Redskins and Haynesworth already had a deal in place. That would be a textbook example of a violation of tampering rules. But can the Titans prove it? We know that Haynesworth's agent was spotted talking to Redskins owner Daniel Snyder at the NFL Scouting Combine, but that doesn't prove anything. And Haynesworth says he didn't hear anything from the Redskins until four minutes after the free agency period officially started. Of course, last year, most people thought the evidence that the 49ers tampered with Lance Briggs was fairly flimsy. That didn't stop Goodell from ruling that the 49ers had, in fact, tampered -- and from giving the Bears one of the 49ers' draft picks. The Titans aren't making a big deal out of this publicly, other than Titans general manager Mike Reinfeldt saying, "It's always something we can address with the league.'' You can bet Goodell will hear more than that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skinsinparadise Posted March 8, 2009 Share Posted March 8, 2009 One thing here is there were rumors it will be the Skins, and it would be a 100 million contract -- pretty much what happened. There were no rumors that I can recall for example about the Giants. One of the articles purported that the Bears didn't have much on the 49ers relating to Briggs/tampering but the Bears were awarded a pick anyway. If we lose a pick hope its not this draft. Snyder isn't depicted as a warm and fuzzy type so I don't how nice the NFL is going to be to him in this case Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chief skin Posted March 9, 2009 Share Posted March 9, 2009 titans knew he was not worth the money he wanted, danny got taken again Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rocky21 Posted March 9, 2009 Share Posted March 9, 2009 This will happen when monkeys fly out of Madonna's butt. :bsflag: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rdskn4Lyf21 Posted March 9, 2009 Share Posted March 9, 2009 Almost as awesome as the Iggles losing out on Brian Dawkins. Almost as awesome as your team winning the Super Bowl. :idea: Oh wait, he wouldn't know about that.... :nana: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.