HighOnHendrix

Ditto. I hate both, just hate the b/b more.

White on white was better than burg on burg.

The FCC has always had a reputation of handing out penalties unfairly. Their interpretation of what is/is not offensive is notoriously uneven. Like when they fined Howard Stern but not Oprah for saying basically the same thing.

http://www.vipbox.tv/sports/american-football.html

I don't think it was ever deactivated or closed, just laying around collecting dust. You can find lots of things if you go digging for them.

True enough. Weird when threads get exhumed, though. Gives me the creeps sometimes lol

I think there have been more posts in this thread this year than back when it was started!

Wow, this thread is still going strong. Unbelievable.

http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/news/50003118-78/stark-fliers-guilty-photo.html.csp Woman pleads guilty to creating bestiality fliers BY MARIANGELA MAZZEI The Salt Lake Tribune Published Jul 28, 2010 03:02PM Updated Sep 21, 2010 07:31PM A woman pleaded guilty Tuesday to using a computer to paste the head of a 13-year-old girl onto a photo depicting bestiality and passing fliers with the photo around her school. Danette Stark, 37, pleaded guilty to three counts of sexual exploitation of a minor. She originally was charged with 18 counts of sexual exploitation of a minor, each a second-degree felony punishable by up to 15 years in prison. The other 15 counts were dropped as part of a plea deal. The victim’s mother said Stark was chatting online with her daughter early in the morning this year. Her daughter was friends with Stark’s daughter. The woman said Stark was getting too personal with the girl. “I told her it wasn’t appropriate and she got mad,” she said. It sparked a feud between the mothers and led to the teens’ friendship dissolving. “It started out between us,” the victim’s mother said. “I’m angry. I’m sad … it just doesn’t make sense.” Months later, Stark used a computer to paste the head of the girl onto a photo of a woman having sex with a dog. On May 24, the photo was distributed at the victim’s school.

Of course it is. Being a bandwagoner/fairweather fan is always easy. The ones who are actually hardcore have ESPN to prop them up during the lean times, so they always think they are better than they actually are. Pretty pathetic when you think about it.

Lol, so was I. I think the main reason is because it's in the Bible. Also, there's the whole consensual act kinda thing. Kinda hard for a horse or dog to confirm they really did want it, regardless of what that dude saw in its eyes.

Can't speak for him, but in my experience: A: People have told me about it, in particular one guy I work with went into detail about it once or twice. There's also the infamous Donkey Shows down in Tijuana... "Wake up! You're on in five!" :beatdeadhorse: B: Yes, it certainly is foul. C: Please refer to B.

That never gets old. These stories made me think of Spinal Tap. "Workin' on a Sex Farm!"

You won a playoff game. **** you anyway!

Does HOTIME still show those cheesy softcores at night like Cinemax? HB(h)O, used to, too.